rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Yukon First Nations could decide who represents the territory

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

At the Yukon First Nation Forum for the Federal candidates held on September 29th, hosted by the Council of Yukon First Nations, it was a packed house of over two hundred people in beautiful downtown Whitehorse. All the political parties were represented, including the Conservative candidate. He has attended some but not all of the various debates held in the Yukon. This debate was broadcast on a First Nation owned community radio station, CHON-FM, and was live-streamed on YouTube. 

There were two introductions to the debate, one by the Chief of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation, Doris Bill, on whose traditional territory the forum was held. The other introduction was by the Grand Chief of the Council of Yukon First Nations, Ruth Massie. 

The points raised over both introductions included the almost complete lack of concern from the current Federal government regarding Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, inadequate consultation on changes to the Yukon environmental assessment bill (Bill S-6), the need for action on the recommendations from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the anti-terrorism bill which could theoretically target First Nation activists (Bill C-51) and the absence of the "honour of the Crown" when addressing Yukon First Nation treaty rights and unfinished land claims negotiations in the territory. 

With that setting the tone for the debate, it was time for the candidates from the NDP (Melissa Atkinson), the Liberals (Larry Bagnell) and the Greens (Frank de Jong) to rip into the Conservative candidate (Ryan Leef). After they had finished, the audience had a go. 

While there seemed to be a small organized Conservative cheering section in the audience, Leef was the only candidate to get booed. That was to his response, in answer to a question from the audience, on when will Canada get rid of the first-past-the-post system. He actually said Canadians would be confused by a new system and it would probably lead to lower voter turnouts. He also foolishly stated that it would take too long a time to sort out a new system because the Conservatives would want to hear from each and every Canadian. The Green candidate, de Jong, got in the best zinger of the evening when he pointed out that the Conservatives most definitely did not consult with each and every Yukoner on some deeply unpopular changes to the Yukon environmental assessment act (Bill S-6). That got one of the the loudest cheers of the evening from the audience. 

Oddly enough, this election campaign has seen no sign of the Harper appointed Yukon's Senator Dan Lang. He was the one that introduced it into the Senate. One would think that he would be around to try and take some of the heat off their Parlimentary candidate on this controversial issue. But nary a sign of him. Perhaps the Conservative spin doctors reckon he would be too much of a reminder of the various indignities that the current federal government has inflicted upon the Yukon. 

The various Yukon First Nation governments have reacted to this in part by not only hosting this forum but also by getting their citizens registered. Some have hired people to make sure their citizens are registered to vote and understand the electoral process. Thanks to the Fair Elections Act it is now more difficult for voters living in smaller communities to have appropriate identification. A drivers license might have a post office box as the address, which on its own is now not good enough for Elections Canada. Many Yukoners, including quite a number of First Nation citizens, are in this situation. 

First Nation voters without adequate electoral identification can now get a letter of residence from their own government showing that they do live within a region or community administered by that particular First Nation. This combined with a picture identification acceptable to Elections Canada should be good enough to vote. There have been some unique Yukon quirks though. It has recently come to light that two small rural and mainly First Nation communities will not have polling stations on election day. Some residents will have to drive 64 kilometres -- one way -- to vote. 

Despite this, there will be most certainly be more Yukon First Nations voting this time around. This is bad news for the Conservatives. Given their track record they cannot grow beyond their base support in the Yukon, and any new voters to the total voting pool will almost certainly be voting for one of the other parties. 

Everyone is very much aware the Conservatives won by only 132 votes last time. There are about 37 thousand people in the Yukon, with 20 per cent of the population being First Nation. If the percentage of First Nation voters increases only marginally the Conservatives are doomed. In fact, looking at some recent polling it looks like they will probably fall to third place. However, most Yukoners are aware that last time around it looked like the Liberals were a shoe-in and a lot of people voted for the Green candidate and have regretted that decision ever since.

There are concerns about strategic voting this time around, but given the potential rise in First Nation voters and the collapse of support for the Green Party (and thus the distribution of almost all of those votes to either the NDP or the Liberals), it will be extremly unlikely the Yukon will be staying politically blue in the future. 

The federal Conservatives have treated Yukon First Nations with scorn, contempt and slight regard. Election day, October 19, will be payback time. 

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.