rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

How voting 'No' to a P3 in Abbotsford's public referendum will be a 'Yes' to public water

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

On Nov. 19, citizens of Abbotsford, British Columbia will go to the polls not only to vote for a mayor and city councillors but they will also vote on whether Abbotsford will privatize its water system.

The public referendum will ask voters whether they are in favour of the City of Abbotsford "entering into a partnering agreement with a private sector partner that will design, build, partially finance and operate a water supply and distribution system from Stave Lake for up to thirty (30) years." To read the full referendum question, click here.

This is only the second full-bore (Design, Build, Finance, Operate) water privatization scheme in Canada and would set a dangerous precedent if it is allowed to proceed. The federal government is in the final stages of negotiating the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Europe which could lock cities into water privatization contracts. To learn about the impacts of CETA on our water services, read Public water for sale: How Canada will privatize our public water systems.

What you can do

Support Water Watch Mission-Abbotsford (WWMA) in their fight against water privatization:

-  'Like' WWMA Facebook page

-  Follow WWMA on Twitter [@WaterWatchMA]

-  Watch and share WWMA's videos

-  Check out www.waterwatchma.ca, specifically the ACT NOW! Page

If you live in Abbotsford, please be sure to go out and vote 'No' on Saturday, November 19. In the meantime, if you are interested in being a Water Watch Mission-Abbotsford brigadier, helping staff community booths or hand out flyers at events, contact WWMA.

If you have family or friends in Abbotsford, please circulate this information to them and encourage them to go out and vote 'No' on Nov. 19.

The Stave Lake P3 Proposal

The City of Abbotsford submitted a proposal to Public-Private Partnerships Canada (PPP Canada) for partial funding of a new water treatment system. Originally, the plan included Mission, British Columbia, but when Mission council voted against submitting the proposal to PPP Canada, Abbotsford submitted the application alone.

The new Abbotsford City website claims that current water supply will not be able to meet demands after 2016. The proposal claims that it will provide Abbotsford with an additional 100 million litres of water per day. But as CUPE BC notes, former City engineer Ed Regts says the current water sources for Abbotsford are not even close to capacity and are "more than capable of providing enough water for Abbotsford until at least 2023."

Regts adds "All the current wells we use that have been upgraded to include treatment could immediately be increased by 20 million litres per day. If we upgraded the pipeline from the treatment facility at Norrish Creek we could add another 51 million litres per day. If you add that capacity, you are far from a shortage."

The Stave Lake project will cost a total of $291 million of which $61 million is to be funded by the federal government. The plan was submitted to Public-Private Partnerships Canada (PPP Canada) for partial funding for a water works project to be completed with private investments and municipal funds. Last Friday, Minister of International Trade and Member of Parliament for Abbotsford, Ed Fast, announced that the federal government would "contribute up to $65.7 million through the P3 Canada Fund towards the Stave Lake Water Project."

PPP Canada and the privatization of our public services

PPP Canada became operational in February 2009 and has a total of $1.2 billion to allocate under the P3 Canada Fund. PPP Canada explicitly promotes privatization of public services by only providing funding to P3s in water and wastewater, transportation and communications. In water and wastewater services, PPP Canada has approved funding for the Lac La Biche Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) Wastewater Treatment Facility in Alberta ($3.8 milllion) and the Evan Thomas Water and Wastewater Plant in Kananaskis Country, Alberta ($9.95 million).

PPP Canada states that the P3 fund was created "to improve the delivery of public infrastructure and provide better value, timeliness and accountability by increasing the effective use of P3." However, P3s in Canada have been found to be more costly and as the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives notes "a string of failures, delays, little transparency, and secretive deals proved these claims wrong."

Water is a commons -- a shared entity to be carefully managed by all -- and the allocation of funding for water services under a P3 entrenches water governance within a neoliberal, market framework that favours profit over human rights, environmental protection, social justice and public health.

Demands to keep Abbotsford's water public

Leading the fight against the privatization of Abbotsford's water is Water Watch Mission-Abbotsford (WWMA). The volunteer membership consists of individuals, ecumenical organizations, environmental organizations, businesses, social justice activists and organizations, anti poverty organizations, unions, retired workers and other community groups.

Concerns about the project include cost, the precariousness of a private company operating the water treatment plant and the ability of the public to access information about the project.

WWMA has also expressed concern about the fact that the city is spending $200K on a one-sided propaganda campaign and that they have diverted enormous staff resources and hired and additional 13 "P3 staff" to work full time on selling this thing to the public is significant. Over 83 per cent of poll respondents find Abby city costly pro-P3 spin "a brutal, shameless propaganda campaign."

Vote 'no' and keep water public!

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.