rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Misunderestimating airplane windows

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

When Mitt Romney was quoted earlier this week musing about why, in this day and age, airplane windows don't open, it summoned memories of a former Republican presidential nominee's difficulty with concepts like "physics" and "grammar." George W. Bush, of course, battled accusations of, shall we say, simplicity throughout his presidency, well before his terrible policies left the Middle East a human catastrophe and brought the world economy to the brink of collapse. The word is that Romney was joking (no surprise since we all know what a whipsmart sense of humour ol' Mitt posesses), but his cavalier attitude toward engineering necessities didn't earn him the same sort of reputation as his predecessor.

Sure it earned a few titters, but no one associated Romney, a Harvard-educated MBA and successful entrepreneur, with the credibility problems which plagued Bush, a Harvard-educated MBA and, er, not-so successful entrepreneur. There has been plenty written on the question of whether G.W. is really as dumb as we think he is -- spoiler alert: the answer is yes -- but Romney's "joke" (sic) reveals something crucial about the elites of the Republican party. It's not necessarily that Romney doesn't know that an airplane's windows need to stay closed in order for its passangers to live, or that Bush misunderestimated how double negatives function in modern English grammar, but that as far they're concerned, it shouldn't matter. The real problem is why both these things haven't yet conformed to their will.

"When the president does it, that means it's not illegal," Nixon famously said of the Watergate scandal in 1977. It's hard to find a better quote that illustrates the logic of epic entitlement which governs the modern neo-conservative movement. George W. Bush, spoiled rich boy and son of a president, doesn't need to know things like grammar, because words mean what he wants them to, damn it. His grammar works by decree, not social practice.

Worse, though, is when we ascribe complex concepts like irony to Bush's inimitible prose. One of the most telling moments in the Bush presidency came when he explained to Katie Couric that "one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror." Critics interpreted this line as a kind of Freudian slip, an accidental moment of truth emerging from two terms of lies and misdirection. It's much more terrifying to think that Bush actually meant what he said literally: why is something I want to do so difficult to accomplish?

Conservatives -- and we can include our own Stephen Harper in the mix -- aren't satisfied with clawing back social security or implementing poisonous, scorched earth policies which will take generations to fix; they want to remake the laws which govern our society. It's no accident right-wing politicians are the most vocal enemies of scientists, educators and artists. Teach a kid grammar and she'll learn to speak; teach a kid to ignore commonly accepted patterns of speech and modes of communication and she'll change the world.

Mitt Romney, who made a couple hundred thousand dollars while I wrote this blog post, isn't demonstrating an ignorance of physical laws when he laments the stuffy interior of his private jet (well, okay, maybe a bit); he's expressing genuine disbelief that somehow, despite all he's done for the great nation of America, the world economy and human beings in general -- despite all the self-worth and privilege he has garnered since birth, so minor an inconvenience as an airplane window sealed shut nevertheless remains forever outside of his control.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.