rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Battle to keep water public is too important to lose

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

In Canada, as in most parts of the developed world, our civic governments have for decades run drinking water and waste water treatment systems as a public service. This is because generations have realized that water is something distinct and precious that must be managed as a public, not private, good.

However, in the last 25 years, two trends have been combining to promote the steady shift of water from a public good to private commodity.

The first of these trends is that senior governments have adopted a free-market agenda based on the belief that government should “get out of the way” of business. As a key component of this agenda, they have implemented policies to promote the privatization of many government services. In the case of public water services, they have deliberately avoided needed investments for many years. This has brought us to the present situation, in which crumbling public infrastructure has created a pressing need for massive infrastructure investments.

As a solution to this manufactured and convenient crisis, governments have promoted public-private partnerships, or P3s. A P3 is an arrangement whereby a private corporation provides some combination of financing, designing, building, and operating an infrastructure project, such as a water treatment plant, and the government pays a yearly fee through a contract often lasting 30 or more years.

Although governments promote P3s as a way to save public money, critics have shown repeatedly that they cost more, since corporations have higher borrowing costs and also must generate a profit. Moreover, because of commercial confidentiality requirements, P3s are much less transparent and accountable.

Not surprisingly, ordinary citizens have been vigorously fighting P3s wherever they’ve been proposed. One of the biggest P3 battles in Canada was fought in 2001 over the Seymour-Capilano water filtration plant. The regional government proposed developing the project with a corporate partner, but the citizens of Metro Vancouver were steadfastly opposed. More than a thousand citizens packed a town-hall meeting demanding that the plant be developed as a public project. In the end, citizens won a significant victory and the Seymour filtration plant was developed as a public project.

Those fighting to keep water public know that corporations involved in the water business have strong government allies ideologically committed to the P3 agenda. For example, both the Canadian and B.C. governments have mandated that the P3 option must at least be considered for any public infrastructure projects over a certain budget. In Victoria, the Capital Regional District is embroiled in a debate over a possible P3 for a waste water treatment system. Kim Manton of CUPE says, “From the beginning this sewage project has been in the crosshairs of the B.C. government’s privatization agenda.”

The second trend fuelling the commodification of water is bottled water. The bottled-water companies have been promoting their product with slick marketing campaigns designed to convince people that bottled water is better than tap water. Companies such as Coke, Pepsi and Nestle take public water, re-filter it, bottle it and sell to consumers at massive profits. Bottled water sales help establish the notion that water is a commodity like any other, and the production and transport of the bottled water creates huge amounts of greenhouse gas and plastic garbage.

New and emerging threats are trade deals under negotiation with the United States and Europe. These deals may well facilitate further privatization of Canada’s water resources and water infrastructure by American and European corporations. Not surprisingly, the anti-democratic Harper government is not even consulting Canadians on the issue or submitting the agreements to Parliament for approval.

It often seems a daunting task to try to keep water under public control. Despite the enormity of the challenge, concerned citizens must continue to fight privatization because the battle over water is just too important to lose. We can either allow ourselves to be bamboozled by a powerful corporate water cartel (and their government collaborators), which wants to profit off something essential to life, or we can reassert democratic, public control over water and our public services.

Originally published as Special to the Vancouver Sun, March 23, 2010

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.