rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The Green Party -- party of small business?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

When asked recently what she thought of Jack Layton's proposal to double the payout of the Canada Pension Plan over a period of years (by gradually increasing premiums paid by workers and employers) Elizabeth May, the leader of the Green Party replied:

"I'm not sure why Jack would propose that. I think that's a very poor idea. It would constitute an additional burden for each employer for carrying employees. If I understand correctly, what he's put forward would actually have a negative impact on employment overall because that would create an additional burden for small business and it would reduce the pay cheque of every employee."

The operative phrase here is clearly "if I understand correctly."

It is not a secret that many on the Green Party executive are holdovers from the right-wing reign of Jim Harris and apparently Ms May is taking her lead from them.

The quote from the Georgia Straight caught my eye because I had just read an article in the Globe and Mail that answered the Green Party leader's questions as to why "Jack" would propose such a thing:

"The share of insolvent consumers among people aged 55 and older has more than quadrupled in the past decade, hitting 20.6 per cent last year, the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada said Tuesday. It's the steepest increase among all age groups."

Over a quarter of a million Canadian seniors live below the poverty line. If May wants to get a taste of that kind of poverty she might try a bit of cat or dog food, allegedly part of the diet of some desperate seniors.

May's argument about the plight of the small business person is exactly the same one that B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell makes about increasing the minimum wage. The arguments don't stand up to scrutiny. Gradually increased minimum wages do not result in increased unemployment or less hiring. The same would be true for CPP premiums.

A business paying an employee $47,200 per year (the maximum pensionable earnings) or more would initially have to pay an extra $3.57 a week to gradually double future Canada Pension Plan benefits. If that's a deal-breaker, then the business is doomed anyway.

Increasing pensions has the same effect as increasing the minimum wage -- it puts more money into the hands of the poorest citizens, money spent directly in the economy, including those same small businesses May is so concerned about. High wage economies with robust middle classes are more stable and more equal than low wage ones. Canada is going to see a major demographic change over the next 10 years as more and boomers retire. If those boomers don't have money to spend, it will hurt the economy a lot more than marginal increases in the payroll tax hurt would hurt it now. Last year the CPP paid out $29 billion in benefits, most of which went straight back into the domestic consumer economy.

Layton's proposal for increasing the CPP was just part of what he called a "matrix" of policies to reduce inequality in Canada. May should take the time to look into the whole inequality issue. There is now a bigger gap between the rich and poor in Canada than at any time since 1929. Canada has the second highest percentage of low-paying jobs of any Western developed nation. We have a homeless crisis that should embarrass every Canadian.

Canada already has two parties dedicated to business, and ignoring inequality, it hardly needs a third.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.