rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

What is the VPD hiding? Pro-privacy groups are digging deeper for answers on Stingray use

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

A coalition of privacy and police accountability groups are demanding further transparency from the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) following an inquiry into police use of mass surveillance devices known as Stingrays or IMSI-catchers.

These devices mimic cell towers and sweep up all sorts of sensitive information from cell phones within a two km radius -- just check out how many people would be affected by a Stingray device located in downtown Toronto above.

The British Columbia Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner (OIPC) recently finalized its investigation into the VPD's use of Stingrays after the VPD stated they did not use the device in a letter to our friends at the Pivot Legal Society, who issued the initial complaint.

However, last week court documents published in Quebec, and analyzed by Vice and Motherboard revealed alarming news: the RCMP has been using Stingray devices for the past decade and, to make matters worse, it has also been retaining information on thousands of innocent Canadians while giving other police departments access to Stingrays for their investigations. These revelations sparked a wave of concerns and indignation from the public, as reflected by these comments from our community:

A very disturbing but not surprising ongoing violation of Canadians' privacy.

Too lazy to do real police work.

In response to the publication of these court documents documents, the groups backing the OIPC inquiry are now asking Chief Adam Palmer whether the VPD ever used the RCMP's Stingray devices or accessed the associated data.

In the words of Doug King, Police Accountability campaigner at Pivot Legal Society: "It's long past the time for the VPD-- and law enforcement agencies across the country, for that matter -- to come fully clean on how they are surveilling the public."

The OIPC inquiry was originally filed in response to the VPD's refusal to provide concrete answers on Stingrays in a Freedom of Information request made by Pivot Legal Society last year. This March, Pivot filed an appeal with the OIPC backed up by submissions from OpenMedia and our allies at the B.C. Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA), B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Association (B.C. FIPA), demanding that the VPD disclose its records under the access to information laws.

All in all, we're pretty skeptical about the VPD's claim that they don't possess any records at all regarding Stingrays -- as our own Laura Tribe stated,

"Last week's revelations showed the RCMP has been in possession of Stingrays for a full decade. It defies belief that the Vancouver Police Department has no records whatsoever regarding the existence of, or the potential use of these devices. The VPD's decision to stonewall OIPC for so long amounts to a waste of taxpayer money and government resources. The public deserves an informed debate on these issues."

For more background, you can find Pivot Legal Society's original Freedom of Information request here as well as the VPD's initial response to the inquiry on its use of Stingrays. Pivot's most recent appeal to the OIPC can be found here, alongside the respective interventions from the BCCLABCFIPA and OpenMedia.

It's clear that we're slowly making progress toward getting more answers on the use of Stingrays -- but we need your support to win this. If you've yet to do so, be sure to add your voice to our #StopStingrays campaign at StopStingrays.org to demand transparency and accountability regarding law enforcement’s use of these invasive mass surveillance devices.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.