rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Publishing giants just hurt the right to link in a disappointing court ruling. Will the EU Commission follow suit?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

EU flag with copyright logo imposed

In a closely watched decision, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on September 8 that the mere act of linking to copyrighted content can in and of itself be a breach of copyright. The decision went against the advice of the CJEU's own advocate general, who stated earlier this year that the act of linking should not be illegal.

Although the CJEU created a narrow exception where links are not posted for profit, the sweeping ruling will affect any commercial enterprise, even news startups and small-audience hobby bloggers, that share links with their readers. The ruling will be directly binding on the 28 EU member nations, but experts have warned it will also have a worrying global impact, given that it affects any link that is accessible within the EU.

It appears that the right to link is under attack in Europe. Big publishers just hurt Internet users with their upsetting victory at the CJEU. With the EU Commission's controversial Link Tax proposal just around the corner, Internet users should be deeply concerned that these out-of-touch decision-makers will follow suit and further harm our right to link.

Put simply, publishing giants just harmed our right to hyperlink through the courts. Now, will the EU Commission follow suit with their Link Tax proposal?

Links are the lifeblood of the Internet, and this ruling will have a chilling effect on our right to share and access information freely. Nobody should need to worry about being sued merely for linking to freely available content. Forcing people to pass complex legal tests before sharing links is just unworkable.

The implications of this ruling are profoundly worrying for anyone who cares about access to information and freedom of expression. It will no doubt spawn a rush of lawsuits and create legal uncertainty for any service that utilizes links online. This won't be the end of this matter, and I'm sure EU political leaders will be getting an earful from the public and from industry groups keen to limit the potential damage.

The case has been closely watched by digital rights advocates, worried about the implications for how people access and share content online. Among the major concerns raised by the September 8 ruling are:

  • The CJEU states that: "when hyperlinks are posted for profit, it may be expected that the person who posted such a link should carry out the checks necessary to ensure that the work concerned is not illegally published." This places an unduly heavy burden on small businesses and bloggers who may not have the resources or the expertise to check the legality of every link they share.

  • Hobby bloggers who earn even a modest income from their work, such as by having ads on their blog, will now be legally responsible for ascertaining the copyright status of every item of external content they link to (photos on Flickr, music on Vimeo, etc.)

  • Small businesses which use Facebook for promotion will now need to check the copyright status of everything they share.

  • Who will be responsible for going back and checking all historical links to ensure none of them host copyright infringing content? This is clearly a legal and logistical nightmare scenario.

The ruling comes hot on the heels of deeply unpopular proposals by the European Commission that would grant publishing giants the ability to charge fees when snippets of text are used in hyperlinks -- a.k.a. the "Link Tax." The European Parliament will be considering these proposals shortly.

Over 100,000 people worldwide are working together to protect our right to link at SaveTheLink.org

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Photo credit: Pixabay

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.