rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Finally some sensible media coverage on Iran

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

While the rest of the western mainstream media (having not learned their lessons from their role in aiding and abetting the 2003 Iraq war) seem all to willing to let warmongers get the best of them, the Globe and Mail's Doug Saunders has given the global public interest some hope for his profession and a more peaceful world. 

This past Saturday (February 21, 2009, p. F3) Saunders wrote an article entitled "Iran: The Enemy that Almost Isn't," where he pointed out a number of inconvenient facts that are all-to-often left out today's mainstream media coverage on Iran, and pronouncements from irresponsible governments like our own Canadian government.  

The following are some of the much needed points/quotes that Saunders makes that we should all measure future, and hopefully more responsible, media reports and government news releases: 

-"It is likely that simply by looking at Iran as a threat, we've made it one." 

-"Imagine if, in response, the U.S. government made a public, formal apology for the 1953 Central Intelligence Agency overthrow of Iran's elected government, the act that had sent the country on the path to extremism in the first place." 

-Madeleine Albright, the U.S. secretary of state in March of 2000 said "...the United States has cordial relations with a number of countries that are less democratic than Iran.” 

-In 2003, moderate Iranian President Khatami "sent a Swiss official to Washington to make the peace offer. In exchange for recognizing Israel, cutting off Hamas and proving it had abolished any nuclear-weapons plans, Iran wanted an end to sanctions, normal diplomatic relations with the U.S. and recognition of its role in the region....So what happened? Well, nothing. George W. Bush was president, the Iraq war was just approaching the 'mission accomplished' phase, and nobody in the White House thought it would look good to make peace with Iran, a country that only the year before had been made a rhetorical component in Mr. Bush's 'axis of evil.'" 

-"That diplomatic snub was one of several humiliations, diplomatic and economic, that led to the defeat of Mr. Khatami's reformists in subsequent elections and the victory of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's neo-conservative zealots." 

-"....one State Department official directly involved with the Iranian offer told me, 'It was like we missed the biggest Middle East peace opportunity of the decade, just so we could keep saying ‘axis of evil.'"

-"Most of the objection to this scenario [friendly relations with Iran] is based on our belief that Iran is developing a nuclear weapon. But that, too, is almost ready to vanish into vapour. Our most authoritative source of information about Iran's nuclear program is the 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate, which stated categorically, based on voluminous sources, that Iran had abandoned its nuclear-weapons program in 2003. Intelligence officials acknowledge openly that the past two years have not added a single new piece of information to that assessment." 

-"Iran, as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, is closely watched: It has teams of inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency in the country on a permanent basis." 

-"It was reported this week, based on a new IAEA report, that Iran has produced 'enough low-enriched, reactor-grade uranium to make a bomb.' This, as former Los Alamos National Laboratory scientist Cheryl Rofer has carefully documented, is scientific nonsense: Yes, that uranium contains enough U-235 to make a bomb. To get it out, you would need to kick all the inspectors out of the country, reconfigure thousands of closely watched centrifuges and engage in years of enrichment." 

-“As long as we are monitoring their facilities,” IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei said recently, 'they cannot develop nuclear weapons. And they still do not have the ingredients to make a bomb overnight.'" 

-"The countries that have actually produced atom bombs on the sly in recent years – India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel – have done so by refusing to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, so there are no inspectors." 

-"Most informed observers, including Mr. ElBaradei, believe that Iran is merely “hedging” by keeping open the possibility of building a bomb within five to 10 years – exactly what Canada once did." 

Let's hope that Doug Saunders will inspire his journalistic colleagues to ask the right and hard questions of those who would want to see our 21st century continue to be embroiled in a culture of war.  

With Saunder's example of responsible journalism there is more hope that our global society can enter into what former Secretary General of UNESCO Federico Mayor called a Culture of Peace.

Dr. Paul Boin ([email protected]) is an assistant professor of communication studies at the University of Windsor, founder of the Media Justice Project and a member of the Campaign for Democratic Media. His forthcoming book “Media for the Public Mind: Creating a Democratic and Informative News Media” will be published by Fernwood Publishing in the Fall of 2009.  

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.