rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The green part of green and the development of LNG in B.C.

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: BC Gov Photos/Flickr

Unlike a number of green advocates, political and otherwise, I think there can be some significant benefit for British Columbians from the development of LNG exports, particularly if issues around the supply and pricing of electricity, and the regulation and offset of industry GHG emissions are properly addressed. Nevertheless, I do agree with those who argue that LNG won't bring the unprecedented riches that our indefatigable even if deluded premier would have us believe.

However, what worries me about the Green party position on LNG is not so much their assessment of the economic benefits from LNG. Rather it is their suggestion that somehow the development of wind, run-of-river and other such renewable energy would be a much more beneficial industry for British Columbians to pursue. Aside from the fact that developing renewable energy is not a substitute in any sense for the development of LNG for export, it makes no economic or environmental sense to implement policy that would accelerate the development of those projects in British Columbia.

Of course British Columbia has more renewable energy sources that it could develop. The catch though is that British Columbians would have to pay for it. There are no lucrative export markets waiting for high cost, B.C. renewable energy supply. And if there were, projects serving those markets would be going ahead. The Greens call for additional renewable supply would only come about if BC Hydro were forced to buy or develop more such energy sources than it otherwise needs or could justify.

If that sounds familiar, it is. The Greens are essentially calling for a renewal and presumably expansion of the Liberals' widely discredited Energy Plan. As we now know, that plan forced BC Hydro to buy renewable energy it did not need, imposing losses of hundreds of millions of dollars per year -- losses that have contributed greatly to the sharp, upward pressure on BC Hydro rates. It was not a good economic strategy for anyone but the IPP industry that got contracts for power it could not otherwise sell. It is no wonder that the IPP industry lobby group, BC Clean, is supportive of the Greens' renewable energy position.

As for the environment, it is never a good strategy to build projects we don't need and that are not in the broad public interest. Renewable energy projects may not emit GHGs, but they can have significant land and resource effects. It would be far better for the environment to concentrate on conservation and energy efficiency than to go back to the Liberals' discredited Energy Plan. Study after study indicates there is tremendous economic conservation potential that for a variety of reasons we have not yet exploited.

There will be green and renewable energy industry pressure on whatever party forms the next government to force BC Hydro to develop or buy renewable energy we don't need and can't justify. It's the 'green' thing to do. But I would argue it is 'green' pressure we should try to resist for it will, as it has in the recent past, raise green issues of a different kind.

Photo: BC Gov Photos/Flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.