rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Cheap power for jobs (except it ain't cheap)

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: BC Gov Photos/flickr

It has a nice political ring to it -- "power for jobs." That is what Glen Clark wanted to do with the Columbia River Treaty power that was returned to the province in the late 1990s. And that is what Vaughn Palmer argues B.C. should do today with the hydro power we have or could have from the Columbia River dams or presumably from elsewhere in the system.

Palmer suggests that if we were to offer hydro power to electric intensive industry at a very low rate, we could have our own carbon fibre production just like Washington State. Cheap power could kick start new industry and new "green" jobs.

I suppose that could make sense if we had cheap power available for sale. The problem, of course, is that we don't. All the cheap power we have (or could have even with renegotiated Columbia River Treaty obligations to store water for the Americans) is needed to meet our existing and forecast requirements. If we attract new industry with the offer of cheap power, we will sooner rather than later have to develop new sources of supply like Site C. And Site C is expensive, more than double in cost than the cheap rates Palmer's carbon fibre producer would want to pay (or Glen's aluminum smelters would have paid).

Cheap power for jobs is an industrial strategy based on subsidizing energy use. It never made sense with oil and gas (think methanol) and it doesn't make sense with electricity.

Of course, the more Machiavellian observer will note that if we build Site C before it is needed to meet our existing and forecast requirements, then we will have surplus available for sale, and that surplus could be logically sold at a very low rate.  After all, if the Site C surplus is not used to attract new industry it would simply be sold in the export market at a low spot market price. You could fix one bad decision with another.

I suppose, but as Seth Meyer would say: 'Really?'… is that what our industrial strategy is going to be? Really? Are we going to make one bad decision so it can be fixed by another?

Photo: BC Gov Photos/flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.