rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Expanding the Canada Pension Plan

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

The case for expanding benefits under the CPP as a needed response to the crisis of private pensions continues to win expert support -- even as the financial industry and small business lobbies continue to fight real pension reform tooth and nail.

The centre-right Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP) have published interesting and useful papers by Michael Wolfson (former Assistant Chief Statistician) and Keith Horner (a former senior department of Finance official) which broadly side with the CPP expansion option as opposed to voluntary Defined Contribution plans like the PRPPs being promoted by the federal government.

Wolfson estimates that under current public and private pension arrangements, fully one half of baby boomer middle-income earners born between 1945 and 1970 will face an income shortfall of 25 per cent or more after retirement.

While there are differences in approach between the two, both Wolfson and Horner favour a model of CPP expansion which would combine an increase in the current CPP pension replacement rate below about $48,000 with an increase in the range of income covered by the CPP. Compared to a simple doubling of the CPP replacement rate, this would generate a smaller CPP increase for those with below average earnings, and a larger increase for those with above average earnings.

Horner argues that the CPP option will generate larger and more stable investment returns than defined contribution plans, and that mandatory coverage or automatic enrollment are needed to increase retirement savings.

Wolfson's paper is quite radical, taking issue with the current legislative requirement that any increase to CPP benefits be fully pre-funded. His basic point is that the pending retirement income crisis needs solutions which impact much faster than those now on the table. His take on the issue of inter-generational fairness is well worth reading.

This article was first posted on The Progressive Economics Forum.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.