Change the conversation, support rabble.ca today.
It has been a week and a half since changes to the definition of suitable employment and reasonable job search have come into effect. Already, a single mom in Prince Edward Island, Marlene Giersdorf, has become a symbol of the hardship these changes are likely to have on many Canadians in the coming months.
When she refused to expand her job search radius to Charlottetown, a 45-minute drive away, because she didn't have a car, she was cut off EI benefits. Giersdorf says she was told that if she wasn't willing to look for work in Charlottetown, then she could always apply for social assistance. Her protest has touched many, with some starting a fundraising website to buy her a car.
On Jan. 15, the Quebec government called on the federal government to reverse these changes to EI and do an assessment of their impact before reinstating any changes. They are concerned about the downward pressure on wages, and increases in social assistance rates as unemployed workers are cut off benefits and have no available employment.
This response from the Quebec government follows a huge protest in Îles-de-la-Madeleine on January 13, where over 4,000 people came out to protest the changes to Employment Insurance.
MPs from PEI are hearing broad concerns, and are tracking them so that they can be shared with Minister Finley.
This fear and confusion stems, in part, from a total lack of consultation with employers and employees regarding amendments to EI. As evidenced by the backlash to the changes to the Working While on Claim pilot project changes, lack of consultation leads to unintended and sometimes negative outcomes for the very people that EI is meant to assist.
The confusion around these issues is likely to increase errors in EI claim decisions, and increase the number of appeals. The current standard for EI appeals is that they be heard within 30 days, but in 2011-12 only 29 per cent of appeals were heard within that time frame. This is a decline from 2002-03, when 42 per cent of appeals were heard within 30 days. Changes to the appeals process that come into effect in April 2013 only increases apprehension for unemployed workers and those who work with them.
Photo: Tania Liu/Flickr
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.