rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Canada's new recession and the push for alternatives

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

Credit: Michal Rozworski

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

The Bank of Canada cut its benchmark interest rate two weeks ago to nearly record lows, now just 0.5 per cent. In the face of an oil shock and other weakness, monetary policy is expected to do the heavy lifting of beating an economic funk. The move reflects a poverty of economic policy from the ruling Conservatives and much of the political class.

Harper has been adamant that Canada's downturn -- now very likely a recession, about which his own finance minister remains in denial -- is the result of global forces. There's nothing that can be done to counteract a host of external problems but to button down. The best a government can hope for is to maintain a fabled fiscal discipline.

However, there's a disjoint between saying that policy couldn't have been used to avert downturns like this one and screaming bloody murder anytime someone raises the prospect of even mildly activist, redistributive, old-school social democratic economic policy. If current policy is that ineffective, then perhaps it's high time to try something else? "There's nothing we could have done" is just a fatalistic cover for political choices.

These choices were cemented with the Conservatives' damaging balanced budget law that was passed with this year's budget. According to the new law, a recession this year will mean that a deficit will be "allowed" next year, but that automatic spending freezes on many public sector budgets and wages will also kick in.

The government will be in a position to break from budget surplus but not from important parts of the slow-motion austerity agenda. Given the current budget's optimistic growth projections (two per cent real GDP growth for 2015 compared with the Bank of Canada downward revision to 1.1 per cent today), there will be a deficit nonetheless. It is hard to see how any future Conservative government would not use this pretext to make more cuts, to starve the beast some more.

What remains is for lower interest rates to keep feeding construction booms and real estate bubbles across Canada. A post on the FT's Alphaville blog makes this point, warning that this latest rate cut will only aggravate what everyone including the OECD and the Bank of Canada describe as an "overvalued" market. On the other hand, there's still enough capital sloshing around the world that this strategy might work for a few more rounds. Canada's more stringent laws have so far contributed to slowing more explosive bubble growth.

Meanwhile, the oil boom is over for now, the industry in hibernation. While the effect of the oil price crash has been a net positive in the U.S. with the boost from lower prices facing consumers taking the upper hand, in Canada, the net effect looks to be a net negative. (Even though both Canada and the U.S. have oil industries that make up a small, single-digit percentage of GDP, Canada's are more important to our exports and the U.S. has the world reserve currency, not one tied increasingly to resource exports as is Canada's.)

This is the best we've got is the message from the establishment, not just the Conservatives.

So I suppose we can now look forward to hearing more about the feared zero lower bound, secular stagnation and the like, all familiar from economic discourse elsewhere in the global North. After years as the darling of the advanced economies, Canada today lacks an "enlightened wing" of its elite to buttress the economy.

In the U.S., this role was played by Fed, which through its QE program helped revive post-crash U.S. capitalism and Canada's along with it. Now the QE taps are off south of the border and while the U.S. is growing -- slowly and without much growth in the incomes of workers but growing -- Canada has most likely entered into a recession all of its own.

The silver lining is that there is a space and an opening here in which to push for alternatives. The coming election is an opportunity to push the debate towards more than fumbling the ball better or worse. Far beyond that, however, there is room to organize around and popularize economic alternatives. The mainstream of the environmental movement is calling for jobs alongside climate justice. And here is a list of demands that was just released by the heads of the provincial labour federations:

  • $15/hour minimum wage across the country;
  • doubling of the Canada Pension Plan;
  • creation of an affordable national childcare program;
  • the revival of the Canada Health Accord;
  • comprehensive immigration strategy with a pathway to citizenship; and
  • establishment of a Green Jobs agenda for Canada.

Just these measures speak loudly in a desert of popular alternatives and they are but some examples. And the question of how to fund any of these demands will raise the question of who pays and how much: difficult, necessary questions that have their mirror in those about who has gained over the past two decades of growth.

Here is to alternatives. The government is prepared to blame the world and fall back on austerity, while the Bank of Canada can only pump more money into a bubble. This is a space for a left with simple, popular economic demands.

Originally posted on my blog two weeks ago and only belatedly cross-posted here. In my defence, I've been busy setting up my new site: check it out at rozworski.org!

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.