rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Federal government says it has no 'social contract' to care for military veterans

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

CBC is reporting the federal government's official response to a lawsuit by Canadian veterans who say the government's miserly benefits to injured veterans from Afghanistan and other wars is a violation of a 'social contract' to protect them dating back to World War One.

Government lawyers have filed an argument in court that the federal government does not have such a social contract with veterans.

The move comes in response to a class-action suit brought by veterans against the New Veterans Charter that was approved by all four parties in the federal Parliament in 2005. Veterans say the Charter provides too little compensation for what soldiers risked. A key issue in dispute is that the new Charter replaced monthly payments to injured and recovering veterans with lump sum payments with a capped maximum.

A Postmedia news report in 2012 explained the following:

The New Veterans Charter is a relatively new statute which was enacted in 2006 at the height of the bloody Afghan conflict. Introduced by Paul Martin's Liberal government and endorsed by the

NDP and Conservatives, it replaced a set of regulations called the Pension Act.

Supporters say the new regulations provide additional benefits such as re-education and priority hiring in the federal government... But (NDP MP Peter) Stoffer admits that some severely injured veterans lose hundreds of thousands of dollars over their lifetime, as shown in a 2011 Queen's University study.

The study found that severely injured Afghan veterans post-2006 will receive an average one-third less from Veterans Affairs Canada than those coming under pre-2006 regulations. Study author Alice Aiken says the payments are usually one-time lump sums, rather than monthly cheques that actually work out to a lot more money over the course of a lifetime. [Read the 67-page, 2011 study here.]

Veterans are also up in arms over the recent closure of eight regional service offices of Veterans Affairs Canada. They have staged protests across Canada and called on citizens to vote against the Conservative Party in the 2015 federal election.

The Department of National Defence says 158 Canadian soldiers were killed and 2,047 injured in Afghanistan.

Two more Afghan veterans have committed suicide in recent days, bringing the number of suicides of soldiers to nine in the past several months. The suicide crisis is an acute embarassment to a federal government that champions militarism.

Late last year, Prime Minister Stephen Harper appeared to chide troubled veterans and their families, saying they were not availing themselves of counseling and other services that he says are available. He said it's everyone’s “responsibility to encourage” those who need support to seek help from programs already in place.

“Those supports are available and of course, we will make sure they will continue to be available,” he said.

* * *

Statistics compiled by the Vanier Institute of the Family, as part of the Canadian Military Family Initiative:

  • Number of military families in the Canadian Forces: 45,106
  • Number of children under 18 with a parent in the military: 55,199
  • Percentage of military families who live off-base: 83
  • Percentage of military members who are either married or living common-law: 59
  • Percentage of military personnel who are divorced or separated: 5
  • Percentage who are single: 32
  • Percentage of military spouses who work full-time: 46
  • Percentage of military spouses who are male: 13
  • Percentage of military couples who have children: 75
  • Percentage of military families who have one or more children with special needs: 8
  • Percentage of military spouses who have experienced at least one deployment of their family: 70
  • Percentage who have experienced at least five deployments: 17
  • Percentage who have relocated at least once for a military posting: 76

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.