rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Mulcair isn't pandering for Quebec votes

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Image: Flickr/United Steelworkers

Like this article? Of course you do. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.


Bob Hepburn's column in the Toronto Star, "Mulcair crassly pandering for Quebec votes," repeated the latest Liberal talking points about the New Democratic Party's stance on the threshold needed for discussions on Quebec sovereignty.

Like the Liberals, Hepburn accuses NDP Leader Tom Mulcair of "crass pandering" to Quebec sovereigntists. They both insist that no discussion on the terms for separation could begin without "a clear majority."

Oddly enough they never say what number they have in mind, only that it has to be more than 50 per cent plus one. But by definition that is a clear majority.

Somehow, the mother of all Parliaments had no issue with setting a simple majority as the threshold for Scottish independence. In Canada, we had no problem welcoming Newfoundland into the country after a mere 52.3 per cent of voters voted to join (after the first referendum failed to produce the desired result). Similarly, 50.6 per cent was certainly enough to keep Quebec in Canada when the Liberals almost lost the 1995 referendum vote.

It bears mentioning that the Mulcair speech that the Liberals and Hepburn are citing as evidence of pandering also contained a passionate plea for Quebec to choose Canada.

Making the case for Canada has been the NDP's focus leading up to and since its breakthrough in the province. In fact, the single biggest setback to Quebec sovereignty came on May 2, 2011 when all but four Bloc Québécois MPs (including Gilles Duceppe) lost their seats to New Democrats.

Where I live, local residents may recall that the Liberals first tried this line of attack against the NDP during the 2012 Kitchener-Waterloo byelection. At that time, a backbencher by the name of Justin Trudeau robocalled voters on the eve of the vote to tell them that electing Catherine Fife as their MPP would lead to a breakup of the country.

How'd that argument work out for you, Justin?


Image: Flickr/United Steelworkers


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.