rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

N.S. environment minister ignores environment in decision to halt polluter pay

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: Jim Hobbs/flickr

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

What a difference a minister makes.

When he was Nova Scotia's minister of the environment, Randy Delorey presided over a public consultation process to determine what Nova Scotia should do next about what we discard.

His department received 260 written submissions, the majority of which focused on what environmental bureaucrats like to call "extended producer responsibility," (EPR) and the rest of us think of as "polluter pay."

The idea essentially is to shift the financial burden for "end-of-life management of post-consumer products" -- don't you love bureaucratese? --  from hard-pressed municipalities to producers and consumers. We're talking engine oil, tires, batteries, electronic equipment, hazardous wastes, pharmaceuticals, paper packaging, etc.

The idea isn't new. European countries began doing it in the early 1990s, and today there are what are called "product stewardship initiatives" all over Europe, in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Australia, the United States and... yes, Canada.

Six years ago, Nova Scotia signed on to a Canada-wide action plan on EPR with the country's other provincial environment ministers.

Because we hadn't followed up, Delorey explained in a March report, "Nova Scotia is missing out on opportunities to offset waste management costs and increase diversion." He said his department was preparing EPR regulations. Department officials confirmed this summer they were on track to publish them this fall.

And then...

In late July, Delorey was named finance minister.

His replacement: Andrew Younger. You remember Andrew Younger. As energy minister, he gleefully oversaw the gutting of Efficiency Nova Scotia, the successful, widely praised, independently funded energy-consumption-reducing organization. In its place he created Efficiency One, a lower-power-rates-and-damn-the-consequences creature from the Liberal party election promises lagoon.

Now, less than two months after his new appointment, Younger is already backing away from his predecessor's commitment on EPR. Younger didn't even make the announcement himself; he left that to his gloating media relations allies at the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.

The lobby group, which doesn't like polluter pay, issued a press release explaining Younger had "met with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business to say that the government has decided to 'pause' implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) in Nova Scotia."

Forget public consultations. Forget the environment.

Nice to know who really runs our environment department.

This article first appeared in Stephen Kimber's Halifax Metro column.

Photo: Jim Hobbs/flickr

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.