It goes without saying the Tilt-a-Whirl that is Halifax city council has too long tilted toward men, who traditionally also happen to be white, middle-aged and middle class, usually involved in business of some sort and been recycled through at least a couple of election wash-dry cycles.
There are plenty of people -- count me among them -- who believe it's time for change: for more younger voices, women, councillors of colour, diversity of life experience and perspective.
The question -- far more complicated to answer -- is how to make that happen.
Following the upcoming October 15 municipal election, four of the 16 incumbent councillors -- three of them men -- will automatically return to their familiar chairs simply because no one challenged them.
Most of the eight councillors -- seven men -- who face competition will probably win too, thanks to some combination of the power of incumbency, personal track records and the reality councillor-created self-help grants give them each direct control over a chunk of "discretionary" spending in their districts. Victory is not a given, of course, and there are at least a few incumbents in real races.
That leaves just four current councillors -- half of them women -- who aren't running this time. So 27 wannabes are vying to be one of at least four actual new voices at the council table. (Another caveat: two of those 27 are not new-new; they're former councillors trying for comebacks.)
Big picture: there are opportunities for change: a dozen women, five African Nova Scotians, more younger candidates, plus a few voices that don't check any of the conventional-wisdom political boxes.
Electing even a few not-like-the-others could change -- even improve -- council's dynamics.
But how do we accomplish that?
Some, including some candidates, have suggested term limits. But there's nothing magical about change for the sake of change. Experience can also lead to wisdom. Designated seats for minorities? Wouldn't that just ghettoize those councilors -- and the issues?
Once this election is history, we do need to look for better ways to represent our city's growing diversity in its governance.
For now, it's up to each of us to thoughtfully examine our choices and consider diversity as one of the determining factors in who we vote for. Simple. Simplistic. Clichéd even. But there you have it.
This article first appeared in Stephen Kimber's Halifax Metro column.
Photo: Boris Kasimov/flickr
Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.