rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Red flags for Nova Scotia Liberals in next provincial election

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador/flickr

Could the answer to the pressing-to-pundits question -- why hasn't Stephen McNeil called the much-anticipated-by-pundits fall provincial general election? -- be... "Halifax Needham."

Last week, the NDP's Lisa Roberts, a former journalist and community activist, convincingly won that north-end Halifax riding with 51 per cent of votes in a byelection. McNeil's chosen standard-bearer, Rod Wilson, the executive director of the high-profile North End Community Health Centre, garnered a dismal 33.6 per cent.

There are, of course, historical explanations.

The NDP have held this seat for the last 18 years.

And yet... In 2013 -- the year the Liberals swept into power -- the NDP's popular, long-serving MLA, Maureen MacDonald, barely retained her seat in a 277-vote cliffhanger. (And, with all due respect to Roberts' potential as a politician, she is -- as yet -- no Maureen MacDonald.)

ThreeHundredEight.com, the political polling site, currently shows McNeil's Liberals commanding the support of an incredible, unbeatable 62.1 per cent of voters province-wide. Needham, as the CBC's national poll analyst, Éric Grenier, noted last week, "should be one the Liberals would comfortably win."

They didn't.

You could also make the argument low voter turnout -- 32.5 per cent -- renders the result relatively inconsequential as a predictor of general elections to come.

True, but remember Stephen McNeil deliberately chose the end-of summer, pre-Labour Day weekend, suppress-the-turnout date, believing his party would benefit. And, as Grenier reported in a post last week, "the Liberals lost almost twice as many individual votes as the New Democrats did."

Which means?

That's the question. And perhaps the answer, too.

While public polls tell one story, political parties depend on more in-depth private probing to understand voters' real intentions.

The Liberals' overwhelming poll numbers certainly run counter to their actual job performance. Consider the Yarmouth ferry, Pharmacare, the film tax credit, confrontations with public sector workers, etc.

Could many of those who tell pollsters they support the Liberals be simply parking their votes while they assess the pre-election performance of the NDP's new leader, or the more compassionate conservative, new-look Jamie Baillie?

Is that the red flag for McNeil's Liberals?

Everyone, including Stephen McNeil, knows election campaigns often write their own, poll-destroying narratives. Just ask Stephen Harper.

This article first appeared in Stephen Kimber's Halifax Metro column.

Photo: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.