rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Fish Lake: What cultural weapons and larger agendas are we talking about here?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Fish Lake (Teztan Biny), Tsilhqot'in territory

In the closing hearings of the New Prosperity mine proposal, Taseko Mines Ltd stated that the Tsilhqot’in Nation opposition used culture as a weapon.  On the final day of the federal environmental assessment, the Vancouver based mining company also stated that “aboriginal groups do not have a veto over project development in areas over which they have asserted rights and title” and that “the concept of free prior informed consent does not apply in Canada.”  

In the closing of community hearings in Xeni Gwet’in, Taseko made an elaborate, patronizing case that any outside consultants the Tsilhqot’in have relied on are misinformed because they oppose the mine proposal.  They argued that the information provided to the Tsilhqot’in has lead to confusion, mistrust, and fear.

Despite statements of unanimous opposition from the Tsilhqot’in National Government and all six Tsilhqot’in Chiefs, Taseko continues to argue that Indigenous people are misinformed.  The company insists the unwanted project is for the benefit of the community and will lead to jobs, wealth and prosperity. The company is desperately trying to find a politically palatable rational for an unwanted mine.

Perhaps it is Taseko who are misinformed, given their misinterpretation of aboriginal law.  What is at stake here is rights and title.  It is the rights and title of the Tsilhqot’in who have never ceded authority over their traditional lands.  It is about their right to reject a mine proposal they do not desire.

Fish Lake is located 125 km south west of Williams Lake, BC is the site of the most controversial mine proposal in Canada.  In 2010 the Prosperity mine proposal was rejected.  Three months later, Taseko reapplied for another assessment.  The second Canadian Environmental Assessment for the new prosperity mine ended on August 23rd. 

Non-governmental organizations, including the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, Amnesty International, the Council of Canadians, the Wilderness Committee, MiningWatch Canada, Friends of Fish Lake, Friends of the Nemiah Valley and R.A.V.E.N have been supporting the Tsilhqot’in Nation based on a lack of free prior informed consent.  This principle has been established through international protocols, including the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 

These environmental and human rights advocacy groups have also suggested that Taseko’s application for a second federal environmental assessment a mere months after the initial proposal’s 2010 rejection creates a “mockery” of the process.  The Tsilhqot’in peoples expressed the same sentiment during the hearings.

The strength of Indigenous opposition against this mine remains overwhelming.  This staunch opposition raises questions as to why the proposal is being reconsidered in the first place. 

It is not just environmental and social advocacy groups that are standing in solidarity with the Tsilhqot’in Nation and questioning the integrity of this mine proposal.  The BC Ministry of Mines, Natural Resources Canada, Transport Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the Tsilhqot’in National Government and independent scientists have all questioned the mine on technical grounds. 

The proposal has been widely criticized for its inadequate hydrological plan.  For example Natural Resource Canada, argues there is “inherent limitations” to Taseko’s ground water modeling.  The BC Ministry of Energy and Mines agree.  On a July 30th submission to the review panel the Ministry stated it was unlikely the mine could be developed “without adverse affects to water quality.”

The Tsilhqot’in Nation continues to oppose the project due to the location on a cultural and spiritually significant site.  Further, the Tsilhqot’in do not want the mine because of a long history of poor consultation with Taseko, mentioned repeatedly in community hearings.  The Tsilhqot'in are frustrated the company is not taking “no” for an answer.  The federal review panel is now amidst a seventy-day period, writing a report to the Minister of Environment. 

On the final day of the hearings Chief Russell Myers Ross of the Tsilhqot’in community of Yunesit’in mentioned a history that charted “150 years of struggle against past and ongoing colonization.“  Chief Myers Ross expressed that even if the Tsilhqot’in Nation’s relationship with the Crown was one of mutual respect, his community would still reject the latest mine proposal “on the basis of environmental concerns, the lack of trust and confidence and the social factors associated with mining [in his community]”.  He went on to articulate that “the shear size of the proposal, the site, the roads, the electrical infrastructure has the effect of opening our veins for someone else’s desires but not our own.”

Perhaps Taseko Mines Ltd is a company that should be taking a closer look at their own desires, and what larger colonial agenda they appear to be participating in themselves.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.