rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The NDP should play the long game with Mulcair

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Image: Flickr/davehuehn

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

NDP members from across Canada will soon gather in Edmonton and when they do, the biggest decision facing them is whether or not Tom Mulcair should continue as federal party leader.

But with Convention only weeks away, many New Democrats still haven't reached a decision.

In a sense, their Edmonton choice comes down to forcing a leadership contest as a knee-jerk response to a botched 2015 campaign versus playing the long game of ensuring the party is a progressive and competitive challenger going forward toward 2019.

For many, this writer included, 2015 was the first time New Democrats really believed we could win and, as such, the loss was traumatic. We still haven't got over it.

To be fair, Mulcair has publicly taken responsibility and it is widely acknowledged within the party that the campaign directors made a host of strategic and tactical blunders. An inexplicable decision to avoid the media on writ drop day; A debates strategy that seemed wrong at every turn; an inability to articulate a comprehensive vision for the future of Canada; Failing to advertise on CBC in the critical Toronto market; Insulting voters by repeating right up to E-Day that "only New Democrats can beat Harper" and, an inexplicably stubborn rigidity on four straight years of balanced budgets. These are just a few examples.

In truth, the NDP campaign also had many virtues. We had a stellar slate of candidates. Many of them front-bench material. We had strong local campaigns. Our platform was dominated by high-profile, progressive planks including a national child-care program, a $15 federal minimum wage, increasing the corporate tax rate and undoing the worst Harper legislation, not to mention highly principled stands on Bill C-51 and the niqab.  

But it's also true that most New Democrats shared in our biggest miscalculation. We believed we could win, not by the virtues of our campaign, but simply because Canadians wanted Harper gone, we were the official opposition with a strong numerical seat advantage over the Liberals and because Justin Trudeau was incapable (sic) of rising to the occasion and waging a vigorous campaign.

It was as if we didn't have to earn victory, as much as we just had to not "lose" it. 

That was the "strategic" thinking from Campaign HQ on down and, good soldiers all, we marched forward in August accepting that wisdom, or at least not openly challenging it. We did not get the central campaign we needed and Justin Trudeau performed far beyond all expectations.    

But that was then. Edmonton will soon be upon us and we have to make a choice about how to go forward.

For some, what would feel best, is to expunge the pain by laying the blame entirely on the leader, retiring him from that role and making a fresh start with a new leader who has no responsibility for past errors, but also no experience leading a national campaign and precious little name recognition among voters.  

That's one option. 

Another option would be to think more about what Canadians need from a progressive opposition facing a Liberal government and how the NDP will best position itself in voters' minds when the inevitable time comes, as it will, that Justin has disappointed once too often and the "progressive" paint job starts to chip. 

That is, we could play the long game.

What will voters be looking for over the coming years of a Trudeau majority and in 2019? Quite likely what they so often look for  a leader they recognize and know, someone with a proven depth of experience and who is progressive, principled and a person of integrity.    

So there's the choice: A knee-jerk response to make NDP members feel better, go back to the beginning and start again; or an experienced and effective opposition in the House now with someone acknowledged by one former Prime Minister as the best opposition leader in 50 years and who will be a familiar, respected alternative in 2019.

We can choose one or the other, but we can't pick both.

For me, I have no interest in going back to having a leader no one has ever heard of and with no national campaign leadership experience. It took Jack four tries to find his stride and I believe Tom Mulcair has the substance to get there if we give him the chance.

Let's play the long game in Edmonton and give Canadians the representation they deserve today and the choice they deserve in 2019.  

Chris Watson served as NDP National Director under both Alexa McDonough and Jack Layton.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Image: Flickr/davehuehn

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.