The revelation that Canadian soldiers have been in Saudi Arabia for 17 years highlights Canada's ties to the repressive monarchy, contribution to the Iraq war and hollowness of Canadian foreign policy mythology.
Recently, researcher Anthony Fenton tweeted, "raise your hand if you knew that there was a 'Detachment' of Canadian soldiers serving under U.S. auspices operating AWACS spy planes out of a Saudi Arabian air base since the war on Iraq began in 2003 to THE PRESENT DAY."
The Canadian soldiers stationed at Prince Sultan Air base near Riyadh represent another example of Canada's military ties to the authoritarian, belligerent monarchy. Canadian naval vessels are engaged in multinational patrols with their Saudi counterparts in the region; Saudi air force pilots have trained in Alberta and Saskatchewan; Montreal-based flight simulator company CAE has trained Saudi pilots in numerous locales; and Canadian-made rifles and armoured vehicles have been shipped to the monarchy.
According to the Department of National Defence, Canada's deployment to Saudi Arabia began on February 27, 2003. That's four weeks before the massive U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. The Canadians stationed in Riyadh were almost certainly dispatched to support the U.S. invasion and occupation.
In another example of Canadian complicity in a war Ottawa ostensibly opposed, it was recently reported that Canadian intelligence agencies hid their disagreement with politicized U.S. intelligence reports on Iraq. According to "Getting it Right: Canadian Intelligence Assessments on Iraq, 2002-2003," Canada's intelligence agencies mostly concluded that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, which was the justification Washington gave for invading Iraq.
While CSIS delivered a report to their U.S. counterparts claiming Iraq was seeking nuclear weapons capabilities, more serious analyses, reported the Canadian Press, were "classified 'Canadian Eyes Only' in order to avoid uncomfortable disagreements with the U.S. intelligence community which would exacerbate the sensitivities affecting relations at the political level."
As Richard Sanders has detailed, Canada supported the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in many ways: Dozens of Canadian troops were integrated in U.S. units fighting in Iraq; U.S. warplanes en route to that country refueled in Newfoundland; Canadian fighter pilots participated in "training" missions in Iraq; Three different Canadian generals oversaw tens of thousands of international troops there; Canadian aid flowed to the country in support of U.S. policy; With Canadian naval vessels leading maritime interdiction efforts off the coast of Iraq, Ottawa had legal opinion suggesting it was technically at war with that country.
Canada was likely among the biggest contributors to the U.S.-led war. But the Jean Chrétien government didn’t do what the Bush administration wanted above all else, which was to publicly endorse the invasion by joining the "coalition of the willing." This wasn't because he distrusted pre-war U.S. intelligence or because of any moral principle. Rather, the Liberal government refused to join the "coalition of the willing" because hundreds of thousands of Canadians took to the streets against the war, particularly in Quebec.
With the biggest demonstrations taking place in Montreal, and Quebecers strongly opposed to the war, the federal government feared that openly endorsing the invasion would boost the sovereignist Parti Québecois vote in the next provincial election.
Over the past 17 years this important, if partial, victory won by anti-war activists has been widely distorted and mythologized. The recent National Film Board documentary High Wire continues the pattern.
It purportedly "examines the reasons that Canada declined to take part in the 2003 U.S.-led military mission in Iraq." But, High Wire all but ignores Canada's military contribution to the war and the central role popular protest played in the "coalition of the willing" decision, focusing instead on an enlightened leader who simply chose to do the right thing.
The revelation that Canadian troops have been stationed in Saudi Arabia for 17 years highlights our military ties to the Saudi monarchy and warfare in the Middle East. It also contradicts benevolent Canada foreign policy mythology.
Yves Engler is a Montreal-based writer and political activist.
Image: Maxim Potkin/Unsplash
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.