rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Where's the 2010 Olympics Green Legacy?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

 (**My letter to the editor that ran in the Pique Newsmagazine & Whistler Question).

As Whistler gets ready to celebrate the one-year countdown to the 2010 Olympics, it’s time to evaluate how the “greenest Games ever” have fared so far.

• Completion of the Callaghan Valley has come with a hefty price. Between 89,000 and 120,000 old-growth trees were cut for the legacy trails and ski jumps. VANOC still refuses to commit to a grizzly bear rehabilitation legacy. However, the subdivision-size trails combined with EPCOR’s new sewage treatment plant are ready to service a four-season resort to duplicate Whistler, post-2010 — a developer's dream come true via the taxpayer’s purse.

• Over 800 trees were cut on Lot 1/9 for the “temporary” Celebration Plaza. VANOC has now scrapped the medals plaza as a cost-saving measure and we’re stuck with a yellow-fenced mud pit, suitable for 4x4 monster truck rallies.

• The red-listed Nesters wetland was destroyed to house the experimental refueling depot. Now B.C. Transit is stalling on its budgets and delivery timelines and rumours are swirling that the hydrogen buses will never materialize. Freedom of Information (FOI) documents from DND indicate that part of the site will house 400 military personnel during the Games. Good use of a wetland.

• Whistler's little “white elephant” — the Whistler Sliding Centre — cost $104.9 million and uses 100 kilometres of ammonia refrigeration piping and 68,000 kilograms of ammonia to keep the track frozen. This “fridge in the sky” requires the same amount of energy to operate as Whistler and Blackcomb mountains combined!

The Cesana Bariol Sliding Centre in Torino requires $1.1. million US annually to operate and maintain, and local residents are already complaining about ammonia leaks. In these economic times, will the Whistler Legacies Society have the funds to operate this facility and are processes in place for ammonia leaks?

At first, we believed we could hold a world-class event with minimal impact on the environment, since ski resorts are the most vulnerable to climate change. Now it’s clear that the 2010 Games are awash in “green” and that Whistler has no lasting environmental legacy.

There’s nothing innovative about clearing every tree in site. Recycling, composting or building venues to LEED standards is not innovative — but simply following the norm. Where are the solar panels, the composting toilets, electric cars and green jobs that can be showcased to the world?

While I commend athletes for pressuring VANOC for carbon-neutral Olympics, the IOC cannot continue to destroy the global environment for corporate gain. Why not recycle sports infrastructure by establishing one set of facilities per country (or continent)?

While we ponder what we have lost forever, on Feb. 12, enjoy a piece of “free” 2010 countdown cake and wash it down with a glass of Kool-Aid.

P. Belperio

Whistler, BC

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.