Sid, Alex and Michael: the Canada-Russia nexus

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

There's more to those Crosby-Ovechkin, Sid the Kid vs. Alex the Great duels in the Pittsburgh-Washington playoff series than hockey.

The Russia-Canada nexus has a long backstory. We tend to focus on our imperial-colonial history, our relations with France, Britain and the U.S. But Russia has a formidable place too, because it's a northern country, like us. Though we're keenly aware of the U.S. border, Russia is our other neighbour and rival. It is our obverse. Flip us over at the top and there's Russia. It has always given Canadians palpitations. Those hockey cataclysms in 1956 and 1972 weren't the first times we were shaken by comparing ourselves with Russia.

In 1890, a Canadian literary critic wrote: "Could Count Tolstoy write War and Peace or Ivan Turgenev hold you ... if they lived in Canada? How could they? They could not learn war here, could not be fired by the daily, hourly human agonies which a Russian sees ..." This is sheer misery envy. Those lucky Russians: They suffer; they can write novels! We Canadians, on the other hand, "sit in broad sunlight by day, in the glare of electric light by night; we are nice and warm in summer ... equally nice and warm in winter; we love conveniently and properly."

In fact, Alexander Ovechkin sounds and acts like a character from Dostoyevsky or Turgenev. He glories in his gappy teeth; he doesn't try to hide them. He rejoices wildly when he scores. He's far more a man-child than Sidney Crosby, the one who seems burdened by a sense of greatness.

Don Cherry says Ovie shouldn't "show people up" by celebrating goals, but the exuberance works if you think of him as a big Russian kid. (Anyway, the idea of Don Cherry criticizing others for showing people up is a hoot. There should be a literary term for any statement that oblivious. How about a Cherry?)

Now, we have prince Michael Ignatieff, a descendant of the former Russian nobility, poised to become our prime minister. I once found it embarrassing, this turning to a Canadian who was away for decades in London and the U.S., who often described himself as one of them and bolstered their imperial projects, like invasion and torture, with articles and arguments. But what the hell, it's probably payback we deserve for getting suckered into phony globalization schemes like free trade.

And on further consideration, in the light of Crosby/Ovechkin, I think prince Michael comes by his imperial proclivities honestly. He wasn't just a colonial trying to pass in the metropolitan centres. He has roots. Russia had a true empire. There's a touch in him of Sarah Palin, another imperious figure coming out of the north, where we hadn't expected it.

During the Cold War, people from Soviet satellites often noted how similarly overbearing were the Soviet and U.S. attitudes toward others. The empire is gone, but the straitened Russia that replaced it still has its ancient reflexes. How must they feel when one of their best, Alexander Ovechkin, deploys his genius in Washington, D.C.? I bet it rankles. Maybe they were making a point of pride this week by expelling Canadian diplomats from Moscow in a tit-for-tat over spying when they could have picked on any NATO member? Was it a shot at Sid our Kid, and a little furtive flag wave for Alex, their wayward star?

It's sad that this moment in the history of Canada-Russia relations is playing out entirely on U.S. soil, or ice. But it's a sign of the times. Russians cling to dreams of imperial restoration (in Georgia, Ukraine, Chechnya) and expel some diplomats. While we -- what do we have in lieu of a foreign policy? Unlike Russians, we can't dream of an empire that never was. But there's Jim Balsillie and his own project of restoration: Bring back one of our teams from the air-conditioned deserts of the U.S. Southwest. More power to him.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.