Tax havens: out of sight, out of mind

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

At the root of the public fascination with the fate of Michael Bryant is a question that lies at the heart of democracy: Do the rich and powerful get special treatment?

Preventing the public from answering "yes" to that question will be a challenge for authorities, with the spotlight glaring down on every aspect of the prosecution of the former provincial attorney general for his deadly encounter with a cyclist.

How much easier for authorities to go easy on the rich and powerful when no one's really watching.

The lack of spotlight is certainly making things easier for officials in Ottawa as they deal with another very different investigation that raises the same question about favouritism toward the rich.

At issue here is the case of 100 wealthy Canadians who may have violated Canada's tax laws by hiding money in offshore bank accounts in the notorious tax haven Liechtenstein.

No one questions the zeal of Canadian authorities in ensuring that ordinary folks pay every cent of their taxes. Yet the government often doesn't appear to be equally zealous when it comes to the rich -- even though tax experts estimate Canada loses billions of dollars in revenues each year because well-to-do Canadians hide assets in offshore bank accounts.

The 100 wealthy Canadians with Liechtenstein bank accounts only came under investigation because the details of their offshore accounts were handed to Canadian authorities a year and a half ago by German police.

This amazing case -- an employee at the Liechtenstein bank provided records of wealthy clients from around the world to German authorities -- blew the lid off the usually impenetrable world of tax haven banking. It sparked an uproar in Germany, leading to the tax-evasion conviction of one of the nation's leading businessmen, 450 other tax-evasion investigations and the resignation of some high-ranking officials. In Italy, the case grabbed headlines when the names of wealthy tax evaders were released to the media.

But here in Canada it's been a much quieter affair. CRA spokesperson Caitlin Workman told me in an interview last week that CRA's reassessments of the 100 wealthy Canadians concluded they owed $17 million in taxes, interest and penalties, and that $3 million has so far been collected. She wasn't aware of any tax-evasion charges.

Ottawa's somewhat low-key approach to tax haven users has always been puzzling, but never more so than now, when the global financial crisis has toughened the resolve of other Western nations to clamp down on secret offshore banking.

In the U.S., the Internal Revenue Service and Senate investigators have been doggedly tracking down some 52,000 Americans who had offshore accounts with UBS, Switzerland's largest bank. UBS has been charged $780 million in U.S. fines for helping rich Americans hide assets.

Canadian authorities haven't shown quite the same energy in going after UBS -- even after U.S. investigators unearthed information last year showing that UBS's "Canada Desk" managed some $5.6 billion in offshore money. (Raoul Weil, who was in charge of the "Canada Desk" as UBS's head of global wealth management, was indicted in the U.S. last fall.)

The CRA's Workman said that the CRA met with UBS officials last Wednesday to discuss the bank providing information about offshore operations involving Canadians.

Perhaps the Harper government is working vigorously behind the scenes to make sure wealthy Canadians don't get away with hiding their money offshore. But, without the glare of the public spotlight, the pace seems rather sluggish.

Linda McQuaig is author of It's the Crude, Dude: War, Big Oil and the Fight for the Planet.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.