The destructiveness of war-mongering

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

White poppies. Sometimes something rings a little bell amid the gloom, like a bird singing after a catastrophe, or a light in a raging storm. It's a symbol of peace, first introduced in Britain by the Co-operative Women's Guild in 1936. The notion that hope for peace might live, however, is apparently so outlandish that the symbol is little known and only makes rare appearances, as it did in P.E.I. this Remembrance Day, and always seems to upset someone.

To even think about the remote chance of peace worldwide, and a world order that encourages it, is also to reflect on how relentlessly militarized our entire reality is becoming, in the continuation of the nuclear arsenals (128,000 nuclear bombs built since the Second World War), the militarization of space, the destructive arms trade in the Third World.

And yet, in Canada, polls show the public wants Canada to put peacekeeping above war-making. One such poll a few weeks ago led the Globe and Mail to worry about how war is going to be "sold" to a public with such troubling attitudes in future.

These wars, obviously, will be absolutely necessary. Gussied up with its new look and a new, harder attitude, the Globe had a front-page editorial entitled "Using our military muscle" warning against reverting to a "romantic Pearsonian ideal" and concluding: "Canada's interests are global. Let us take full advantage of our military strength -- and quite literally choose our battles."

Which might sound like: Let's follow the U.S. into any fetid swamp as soon as the Republicans get back in office.

As we agonize over our role in Afghanistan, it's important to remember how this mess was created to begin with.

When the Bush/Cheney Republicans came to office, they had a plan from right-wing think tanks entitled the Project for the New American Century to impose American military power on the world and let constitutional niceties go hang, but which its authors admitted could not be "sold" to the U.S. public except during a time of deep crisis.

September 11 was that opportunity. The attack was directed out of Afghanistan, which was invaded, and the Taliban easily overthrown. OK so far.

But this wasn't enough for the war plan. Iraq was invaded under a false pretext. Afghanistan became the "forgotten war" for a half-dozen years in the shadow of the Iraqi debacle, and was assumed to be under control despite warnings from various quarters. Meanwhile, roadside bombs and other insurgent techniques developed in Iraq were being exported to Afghanistan, and Islamic radicalism was invigorated by the invasion of Iraq, as even the Pentagon admitted with alarm in several reports.

By the time the forgotten war reached the front pages again some three years ago, it was too late -- the Taliban had risen from the dead, and here we are. It's painful to recall the opportunity that was squandered.

After 9-11, the entire world was deeply shocked -- even Iran condemned the attacks -- and was prepared to join in squelching this plague. The moral abomination that was the invasion of Iraq without just cause killed the sympathy and started a new plague. Since then, virtually every victory against terrorism has been as the result of internationally co-ordinated police action. Military action has just riled it up more.

I'm re-reading my histories of civilizations. I'm on a chapter entitled "The Suicidalness of Militarism" in Arnold Toynbee's great work, A Study of History. It's a litany of the destructiveness of war-mongering through the ages -- human, moral, economic, societal -- in which even total victory eventually leads to the "intoxication of victory," which brings the winner to think himself invincible and he starts picking the fights that will eventually bring him down.

For our friend and leader next door, where trillion-dollar military budgets are already ruinous, that's two wars without just cause since the total victory of the Second World War -- Vietnam and Iraq -- and the reinvigorated militarists want to start a new one in Iran, not to mention block ratification of a new U.S.-Russia nuclear arms treaty in the Congress.

Meanwhile in Canada, where our military budget has risen by some 40 per cent in 10 years, we propose to buy new jets at unprecedented cost without being able to explain what they're for, among other expenses that sometimes seem designed for the convenience of the military-industrial complex rather than in any national or international interest.

As for our role in Afghanistan, I for one never believed for a minute that we'd be leaving cold in 2011 unless the Americans did too. With a military policy in lockstep with the U.S., the pressure along diplomatic channels is no doubt ferocious, with future military contracts in play, and the U.S. now desperate not to be standing alone in a no-win situation. The fact that they -- and we -- are in a no-win situation is the result of the bungling militarism of the Bush/Cheney regime.

Our role now is to help the Americans get their foot -- and ours as well -- out of a trap of their own making while keeping up the hope that all is not lost, having sacrificed so much in blood and treasure. And how many times has that very psychology played itself out in history, with the lesson still remaining unlearned?

White poppies, indeed.

Ralph Surette is a veteran freelance journalist living in Yarmouth County. This article was originally published in The Chronicle Herald.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.