How safe is your pension?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Many retirees have found out that the pension they earned over decades of contributions to plans turned out to be less secure than they had assumed. In cases of bankruptcy such as Nortel, this has been a harsh reality for some seniors. Those who had participated in defined contribution plans found their dreams undermined when the stock market tanked in 2008. Even those in large pension plans such as the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan and Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) have been faced not only with increased contribution rates but also stories of huge shortfalls in the pension fund. The stories on "shortfalls" usually include dire warnings of the need to cut benefits by a variety of means, including a later age for retirement and the elimination of cost-of-living protection.

OMERS, which has 440,000 plan members including 130,000 retirees, has total assets of $65.1 billion. In 2013, it earned 6.5 per cent on its investments. Since the 2008 crash, it has earned an average of 8.4 per cent. Its last 10-year rate of return has been 7.6 per cent. The current "deficit" is $8.6 billion. This "deficit" is expected to be eliminated between 2021 and 2025 depending on the rate of return on investments.

Bill Harford, a retired CUPE member and President of the Municipal Retirees of Ontario Organization, receives a pension from OMERS. Here is Bill's take on the dire warnings that pop up in the media:

From my perspective, my OMERS pension is doing just fine. OMERS is no more in trouble than you or I would be if we had to pay off all our debts this minute. In simple terms, if the OMERS pension had to pay out the total pension in a wind-up today, it would be in trouble. Why? Because it is approximately $9 billion short of what is needed to pay out the pension. But so would each one of us be in big trouble if suddenly we found that the new car we bought or the loan we have had to be paid off tomorrow, but this is not what OMERS anticipates.

OMER's like many other pensions was hard hit by the 2008 market collapse. Fortunately OMERS had taken steps to change its portfolio mix, moving more investments from public to private investments. However, despite these changes the crash of 2008 caused tremendous losses to the pension plan of some $6 billion. This has since grown as an actuarial deficit of approximately $9 billion. OMERS has not turned a blind eye to its deficit but has taken action to change its deficit into a surplus. Despite good returns from investments in the diversified portfolios, the deficit reduction has not been as fast as some stakeholders would like. This unfortunately has resulted in an increase to contributions paid by the active OMERS workers and their employers. Some employers have proposed more drastic changes which the board has rejected.

The Board has taken a look at all of its options to ensure the OMERS plan remains solid. No further changes are being made but this does not mean they cannot happen in the future. There has to be a strategy should there be a significant drop in the OMERS plan investments. Until that happens there will be no change to OMERS benefits to the current retirees or the future retirees. As an OMERS retiree, I am not concerned about my pension but it does not mean everything is set in stone.

Retirees need to be involved like Bill is to ensure that their pensions are protected. Retirees need to do this in co-operation with active members as solidarity does not end with retirement.

Retiree Matters is a monthly column written by members of the Congress of Union Retirees of Canada (CURC) that explores issues relevant to retirees, senior citizens, their families and their communities. CURC acts as an advocacy organization to ensure that the concerns of union retirees and senior citizens are heard throughout Canada.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.