What we've learned from Michael Ignatieff's political interlude

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $1 per month!

Please support our coverage of democratic movements and become a monthly supporter of rabble.ca.

Now that he's headed back to Harvard full time, it's too easy to say Michael Ignatieff really was "just visiting," although he was. There must be something more to learn from that weird political interlude in his life and ours. Let's consider the denouement: the time since his party's 2011 defeat.

  • Indecent haste. It took about a day after his loss as Liberal leader in 2011 to "land on his feet," at U of T. He made a call to the well-connected Rob Prichard, who made some calls and Bob (not Rae)'s your uncle. Even if he had the teaching gig sewn up and needed reassurance, he could've postponed the announcement. It's not like the country was winced up worrying about his future, though he could've expended some worry on them. He voiced no concern for the 60 per cent of Canadians who voted against the Tory agenda they got, though he said sorry to some Liberal MPs who got blown away.
  • The inevitable book. I don't understand the haste here either. Fire and Ashes was published just over a year after the defeat. Shouldn't you take time to absorb and process something worth writing a book on? It's not enough to have been there, you have to have really been there.

He says "defeat invalidated me as a politician but also as a writer . . . " Then wouldn't you consider not leaping back into print immediately? Painter Gary Indiana recently wrote that William Burroughs was "among the last American novelists to have lived an entire, real life before becoming a writer." There's something to be said for experience that wasn't always already material. Compare another Liberal leader: Kathleen Wynne. She had a ton of real life experience coming out, while trying to hold together relations with her kids and her ex. That was all before she got into politics and she still hasn't done the book or, perhaps, even considered it.

  • Premature resolution. Ignatieff tells us he realizes it was all a mistake and he's guilty of "hubris." But he offers no exploration of that and much evidence of ongoing hubris. Why not make a career change, at least for awhile? Take time off and do some pondering. I'm a lifelong Robert Frost reader but the criticism that sticks most to him is that he resolved some of his deepest pain a bit too easily in some of the poems. I'm also a big fan of pop songs that have "all right" in them: Randy Newman's "It's all right now, never thought I'd make it, but I always do somehow"; Dylan's "Don't think twice it's all right"; Bob Marley's "Every little thing's gonna be all right"; Barenaked Ladies' "The odds are that we will probably be all right." Those already have credibility because they don't overclaim: they're all right, not great. Be wary of too easily overcoming.
  • Intellectual mastery. At Harvard, Ignatieff will teach Responsibility and Representation: Meeting the Demands of Political Life. Hm. Sounds like, not having done, you teach -- a phrase I loathe. But it makes you think about intellectuals, especially the professor versions.

Most academics put on their pants one leg at a time like the rest of us, and after listing their credentials or the "model" they're employing, they basically tell you what they think the way your uncle Harry or your cabdriver does, with about as much chance of being right. They do have degrees but you can get those from the Wizard, if you make it to Oz. There are certainly people of deep wisdom and insight in the academy, as anyone who's taken a great course knows. But others talk for the same reason the guy on the stool in the sports bar does: to master reality, conquer fear, win respect, make it through the night -- it's often just a matter of what tactic you use; in the universities, it's verbal and mental.

I've been writing on Ignatieff for almost 20 years, since well before this latest phase. Maybe some of it springs from identification, including the Russian background, though my great-grandparents kept a saloon in Vitebsk, they weren't of the white nobility. I sincerely hope this is the last time but, honestly, I doubt it.

This column was first published in the Toronto Star

Photo: flickr/Dave Chan

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.