Combatting ISIS: The case for universal service

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Why do young Canadians join ISIS, and what can be done to prevent this? 

Bill C-51 -- the Harper government's anti-terrorism act -- offers one approach: make it a crime to promote or advocate "terrorism." But a slippery slope leads from criminalizing extremist ideas to criminalizing dissent. Four former Canadian prime ministers, in a statement critical of Bill C-51, point out that "serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of maintaining national security."  

Harper's new legislation could backfire. Characterizing various ideas (including religious extremism) as terrorism might enhance, rather than reduce, the supply of ISIS recruits.

Doug Saunders writes in a Globe and Mail column that "guys who are vulnerable to Islamic State-type ideas… have lost faith in the civil society and institutions around them." He suggests that "keeping people from falling out of faith with civil society is often just a matter of keeping them in school." 

Keeping kids in school is a laudable goal, but not all Canadians who join ISIS are high-school dropouts. 

Governments would do well to consider an additional way to prevent extremism: create opportunities for young people to serve others. This would enable youths who might otherwise join extremist groups to find positive alternatives. More broadly, it would help restore faith in civil society.

In his inaugural speech in 1961, U.S. President John F. Kennedy said, "ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." Later that year he launched the Peace Corps, with a mission "to promote world peace and friendship." He also proposed a national service corps "to help provide urgently needed services in urban and rural poverty areas." Two years after Kennedy's assassination, Lyndon Johnson launched "Volunteers in Service to America" (now called "AmeriCorps"). 

The Peace Corps and AmeriCorps remain active today.

Canada also had a national service program known as Katimavik. It was started in 1977 by Pierre Trudeau with an aim to "spur lifelong civic engagement through community service." 

The Harper government, in terminating support for Katimavik in 2012, said that funding would be redirected to programs that "benefit large numbers of young people at a reasonable cost rather than concentrating… on a very small number of participants at an excessive per-person cost." But the programs it targeted for continued funding (Encounters with Canada and Forum for Young Canadians) do not involve community service. In both of these programs, youth are given an opportunity to visit Ottawa for a week and meet students from other parts of the country.

Did the Harper government miss the point that Katimavik was not designed solely to benefit young people, but also to give them a chance to serve the wider community? Are Harper Conservatives opposed to voluntary service for ideological reasons?

If you are an unemployed young Canadian and want to serve your country, the only available option to do so is with a gun in your hand. There is also the option to serve ISIS with a gun in your hand (at least, this appears to be what ISIS recruiters are offering). 

How different, fundamentally, are these two options? And are they not mutually reinforcing? 

A government that promotes war, that abandons the concept of serving people in the name of peace and friendship, and that fails to respect and support civil society, paves the way for extremist ideas, violence and terrorism. 

Serving others is intrinsic to all the world's major religions -- Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism and others. Many Canadian non-government organizations (NGOs) -- some with religious ties, others without -- provide opportunities for service in foreign countries (see, for example, this program).

Volunteers must be fed, housed and organized. This requires staff and resources. The Harper government isn't helpful here, either. It eliminated the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), once world-renowned for its aid work in developing nations. Much of CIDA's work was done in partnership with NGOs that offer volunteer opportunities abroad. 

Fortunately, volunteer service is alive and well at the community level within Canada. In 1999, Ontario became the first province to require that high school students do 40 hours of community service before graduating. Other provinces quickly followed suit. The editors of Maclean's wrote an article in 2012 making the case that mandatory community service has been a success, and has not turned kids off to volunteering. They cited a study by Wilfrid Laurier University researchers who concluded that "mandatory service programs increase young people's participation in service activities, and do not reduce their intrinsic interest in volunteering." 

Providing more opportunities to serve others would represent a much-needed positive alternative to the seductive call of ISIS. We need a federal government that recognizes this.

Ole Hendrickson is a forest ecologist and current president of the Ottawa River Institute, a non-profit charitable organization based in the Ottawa Valley.

Photo: Ryan Millar/flickr

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.