Dear NDP, it's 2015: Fiscal conservatism and Thatcherism are so 1990s

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

There's something touching about Thomas Mulcair's attempt to become the Tony Blair of Canada: it comes 20 years late. Back in the 1990s, Blair, leader of Britain's Labour Party, declared with some daring that über-Tory Margaret Thatcher had been correct in her right-wing policies, and the route to electoral success for "progressives" meant following in her footsteps. He called it the Third Way though it was really 1(a), and he won three straight majorities with it. Bill Clinton and U.S. Democrats named it triangulation, emulated Reagan, and won two presidencies. Here, Chretien-Martin Liberals went way beyond the Mulroney Tories in slashing "big government" and won thrice. You can see the appeal.

The heart of their conversion lay in zealously embracing fiscal conservatism and balancing budgets. Deficits were the devil's work. Mulcair has adopted this credo, even mimicking their rhetoric about not burdening "our kids and grandkids" with debt. He and his NDP are partying like it's 1994.

The trouble is, it's 2015. What was new gets old. All those societies have tried the formula and it's led to the worst crash since the Depression, collapsed infrastructure, falling wages, exploding inequality -- the list has grown boring. Voters notice. They can see that "left" parties behaving like right ones are redundant. Europe's old left parties -- France's PS or Greece's PASOK -- became irrelevant sidebars. Blair is a pariah in much of his own party. In Greece and Spain it led to the eruption of new left-wing parties like Syriza and Podemos.

Now, in the latest phase, the insurgency has reached into the heart of the old parties themselves. Bernie Sanders, a "socialist" who manages to be both grumpy and cheery, is mounting an effective challenge among U.S. Democrats. In the U.K., Jeremy Corbyn, an irrepressible leftist abhorred by Labour MPs and officials, was elected leader with a stunning majority. The old guard will now try to topple, or maybe assassinate, him. They're so drenched in Blairism they can't believe it. They consider it "madness," the common term applied. It looks like a lot more fun than people on the left are having here.

Other parts of the world have gone farther. South America experienced the most savage version of neoliberal economics and has widely rejected it, making it politically, like the Dos Equis guy, the most interesting continent in the world.

All this leaves Mulcair's NDP blissfully unaffected. He had his conversion moment back in the 1990s, when he voiced public admiration for Thatcher. Like most people, he considers an insight once won never worth questioning again. It comes with a lifetime guarantee. So it fell, bizarrely, to Justin Trudeau to challenge the old deficit dogma. To what I assume is Mulcair's shock, most Canadian voters didn't succumb to the vapours. They seemed to agree. Even a posse of bank economists supported deficit spending, done with care.

None of this is radical: just a little Keynesian pump-priming. It does nothing to tackle inequality, for instance. Even Bill Clinton would probably be OK with it, but then he loves badmouthing himself for things he did in power. He thinks it's adorable. Paul Martin himself stood beside Trudeau as he announced the reversal and approved it. Only Harper and Mulcair gagged on it.

The NDP did well when it stuck by its instincts and opposed the anti-terror bill. That vaulted them past the Liberals. This seems to have dragged them back down. Thinking you're smart and calculating too carefully can do that.

It revealed something too about the party's nature. NDP veteran Gerry Caplan had a Globe column this week which was also touching. He described how verklempt he is over whether the party does well or fails in this election. It's how many of us feel about the Leafs and Jays. Caplan has led an admirable, compassionate life of concern for others. Yet in his column there was no mention of what this election will mean for Canada and its people. It was solely about "us," the party. Party politics turns rational people insane, just as running for office turns nice people into monsters. Still, you're surprised when it comes from the NDP. It turns out their motto too could be, My party right or wrong. Though in their case it's more like, My party right or left.

This column was first published in the Toronto Star.

Photo: Laurel L. Russwurm/flickr

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.