Rather than fearing the Leap Manifesto, let's bring on the debate

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

That silly Leap Manifesto -- giving itself away right in the subtitle, which calls for "a Canada based on caring for the Earth and one another." No wonder it provoked fury and outrage.

As my colleague Thomas Walkom pointed out earlier this week, reports of the manifesto's scariness have been greatly exaggerated; its call for a transition from fossil fuels to green energy is solidly based in science and widely accepted.

So the ruckus over the document is the curious thing.

Now that we've sent Stephen Harper and his climate Neanderthals packing, we're supposed to move on, confident that the planet is in safe hands under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, neither of whom have climate-denying skeletons jangling in their closets.

Amid this newfound contentment, the Leap Manifesto is a discordant prod, a reminder that the reassuring words of our new political leaders are undermined by their active promotion of more pipelines, which will lock us into fossil fuels for decades to come.

Notley, the darling of Canada's progressives for single-handedly slaying a four-decade-old Conservative dynasty, was quick to denounce the manifesto as "ill-informed" after delegates at the NDP federal convention voted to debate it at the grassroots level for the next two years.

This led to a pile-on of media commentators outraged at the prospect of debate breaking out across the country.

Imagine the menace of citizens getting together to discuss what is to be done about climate change -- which a 2003 Pentagon report described in cataclysmic terms, concluding it would lead to a future where "once again, warfare would define human life."

Of course, Notley is in a tough spot. Alberta's disastrous economic situation -- for which she bears no responsibility -- would be much better if past Alberta governments had imposed higher oil royalties and used the proceeds to diversify. Norway did that, and is comfortably surviving the oil price collapse astride a $1-trillion heritage fund.

The NDP premier is struggling to keep Alberta's powerful oil lobby onside, offering up the promise that her credibility as a progressive could win them the "social license" they need for further oilsands development.

But this requires she take action on climate, or at least appear to.

Hence, her widely touted Climate Leadership Plan demands tough reductions in greenhouse gas emissions -- from some sectors. Against the oil industry, it wields a feather.

While other sectors must cut emissions, the oilsands -- Canada's fast-growing source of emissions -- will be permitted to actually grow by 43 per cent, notes Gordon Laxer, professor emeritus of political economy at the University of Alberta and author of After the Sands.

Trying to reduce emissions while allowing the oilsands to grow by 43 per cent is like trying to reduce lung cancer while giving away cigarettes at Canada's Wonderland.

If, for instance, Parliament were to pass the Climate Change Accountability Act (introduced by the late NDP leader Jack Layton and passed by the House of Commons during minority governments in 2008 and 2010), the continued growth of the oilsands at the pace Notley prescribes would present an enormous problem.

Under such a scenario, Laxer says, oilsands emissions would take up fully 84 per cent of Canada's total allowable emissions by 2050, leaving little room for Canadians still struggling to wean themselves off fossil fuels.

What's needed is clearly more than the post-Neanderthal Canadian political world is offering. What's needed is, as Bernie Sanders might say, a revolution.

That's a daunting challenge, but not an impossible one -- with resolute political leadership.

Let's recall the unwavering campaign launched by then finance minister Paul Martin to reduce the federal deficit "come hell or high water!" In the name of appeasing disgruntled bondholders in New York, Martin took an axe to federal spending, resulting in thousands of Canadians losing their jobs and millions more suffering under "austerity."

The transition off carbon could be less painful, since, with proper investment, a green technology future promises to be, in the words of NDP elder statesman Stephen Lewis, "the greatest job creation program on earth."

So rather than fearing the Leap Manifesto, I say bring it on. It -- or something like it -- should be debated in every classroom, church basement, union hall and Tim Hortons.

It's time we considered the possibility that saving the planet is as important as placating a bunch of New York bondholders.

Linda McQuaig is a journalist and author. Her most recent book (with Neil Brooks) is The Trouble with Billionaires: How the Super-Rich Hijacked the World and How We Can Take It Back. This column originally appeared in the Toronto Star.

Photo: United Steelworkers/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.