Bring on the Cancon: A review of cultural policy is long overdue

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Many thanks to culture ("heritage") minister Mélanie Joly for announcing a review of cultural policy. These reviews sometimes feel like the most ancient form of Canadian culture. This one is overdue. Why?

Because there's just so much of the stuff. Gone are the days when a Canadian cultural hero like Mavor Moore, who helped found most of our arts institutions, was asked by relatives, well into his 50s and 60s, when he planned to get a serious job. If you're young and not planning on going into a profession, you're likely picturing a future in some arts/culture area. Not just because it sounds like more fun than a life-draining factory job but because those jobs -- as Trump and Sanders say -- often no longer exist. So it's the task of all sentient public officials to get in and bolster this crucial sector.

Take Drake. He wouldn't exist as we know him without public investment in Canadian culture or Canadian content rules. He spent nine years in a role on the fourth version of Degrassi, which existed because of CBC and its mandate. That's not a passing gig, it's formative. Do you think there's any link between a series named for a street in the 6 and Drake's echoing invocations of Toronto?

No, I'm not saying Cancon made Drake. There's talent, drivenness, luck. But we tend to make an assumption of inevitability when it comes to artistic genius. What would Western music be without Mozart? Unthinkable. Therefore Mozart had to be. But his father happened to be a composer and music teacher. What if he'd been a potato farmer with no clavier in the drawing room? Would there be a void? Would another titan have taken music in another direction, perhaps plucked off the estate by a talent-scouting landowner? These kinds of counterfactuals get asked more often in history (What if Hitler won?) than art. But it's a case for encouraging all the talent that might be out there.

Canadian content rules have always been a little embarrassing, as if we weren't good enough without, ugh, quotas. But Cancon was really less about the Can than the con. France and the U.K. had public arts support too, though not our kinds of content rules since they had their own language and no neighbouring, culture-vomiting behemoth that would've filled every cultural space otherwise. "The state or the States" was the slogan of early CBC supporters and it does sound defensive. But Canadian content was simply the Canadian term for public support of culture. Now that culture is a driver of the economy and a source of hope for young jobseekers, we need Cancon more than ever.

Here's another area for Joly's revue. The Internet is rife with cultural content. There's music, especially on YouTube, along with lots of writing and performance. But it's all notoriously un or undercompensated. There's gobs of money made on the Internet, largely through ads but -- with mythic exceptions like Justin Bieber -- it mostly goes to feudal overlords, such as Google and Facebook. The serfs keep cranking it out for love or eventually quit. Bands that lived from royalties have had to go back on the road, making normal family life impossible. The Internet is as much a domain of the one per cent (i.e., .001) as Wall St. -- perhaps more, since many serfs seem quite happy with their exploitation.

What's the solution? I suggest the first witness (or act) that Joly calls should be U.S. virtual reality pioneer, musician and author, Jaron Lanier. He's proposed payment per byte on the Internet. Everybody who gets watched gets paid. It's brilliant. It'd run like electricity. You pay an initial connection charge, then only for what you use. It would require a complex infrastructure to monitor and distribute payment. That could be public or private but highly regulated. All on its own this could put government back in motion after the Harper years. It would mean more regulation than we now have -- but it would respond to the culturalization of the economy and the feudalization of that culture.

I haven't mentioned the realms of education and journalism, which any idiot can see belong to culture. It's true these measures would mightily tick off the editorial writers at the Globe, who see Cancon rules as a "relic" and shudder at "indirect subsidy of cultural industries." So that would be another plus.

This column was first published in the Toronto Star.

Photo: Anton Mak/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.