Copyright in the new TPP: A milestone or a PR move?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Good-byes from world leaders at APEC 2017 in Vietnam. Photo: APEC Secretariat/Twitter

Last week, citizens watched the news in suspense as leaders from 11 of the original Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) signatories met in Vietnam at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit to discuss the future of the controversial trade agreement without the U.S., which withdrew from the agreement back in January.

At first, reports indicated Prime Minister Justin Trudeau didn't show up, delaying the process. Moments later, it was confirmed that the 11 nations had reached an "agreement in principle" on "core elements" of the TPP, now renamed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

The news came to the dismay of hundreds of thousands of Canadians, who spoke out against the politically toxic deal for years, up until the government's latest consultation, which ended on October 30. This was a clear sign that once again, the government did not bother to consider Canadians' feedback before making a major decision, and merely used the consultation as a public relations strategy.

However, in a win for digital rights advocates, the Canadian government took a strong stance on the Intellectual Property (IP) chapter despite strong pressure from other nations to rush through with the deal with a minimal changes approach. It made a significant improvement to the TPP's original unbalanced copyright rules by suspending the Intellectual Property provision almost in its entirety. The problem is that the suspended chapters in the new agreement are still subject to discussion and could be reopened, should the U.S. decide to rejoin the deal down the line.

Additionally, as Electronic Frontier Foundation points out, other problematic provisions for Internet users are still pulsating in the deal, like ISDS (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) -- a provision that allows multinational corporations to sue governments for millions of dollars for laws that simply don't fit their business interests, in unaccountable tribunals.

Therefore, it's still too early for Internet users to throw confetti -- the fight isn't over yet. Plus, despite a significant improvement to the original agreement, this whole process still happened behind closed doors and away from the public eye. We cannot let this become the norm for how Canada negotiates future trade agreements and builds its relationships with other nations. If the government is truly committed to the "progressive" trade they claim, it is overdue that they embrace open, transparent and democratic processes throughout the entirety of the negotiations.

It will also be interesting to see whether the Canadian government takes a similar approach in the renegotiated NAFTA. Hopefully, Canada will show leadership in achieving a balanced copyright approach in face of extreme proposals by U.S. industry lobbyists and even Canada's own largest telecom, Bell -- who has proposed to introduce a website blocking system and radical new copyright rules that would criminalize everyday online activities, resulting in an unprecedented, widespread chilling of free expression.

As a response to the government's decision to agree to the new TPP, ignoring Canadians voices in the thousands, OpenMedia, Leadnow, Private Internet Access, United Steel Workers, CUPE, and CWA Canada are teaming up to do a massive bus ad campaign in Ottawa to remind Trudeau that we will not be silenced on the TPP. Citizens can contribute to the initiative at: and follow OpenMedia on Facebook and Twitter for the latest updates.

Marie Aspiazu is a campaigner and social media specialist for OpenMedia, a community-based organization that works to keep the Internet open, affordable, and surveillance-free.

Photo: APEC Secretariat/Twitter

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.