Chauvin trial is democratic memento of a critical moment

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

A protester holds a "Justice for George Floyd" sign outside the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis, as the trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin began. Image credit: Lorie Shaull/Flickr

The last televised trial that was a mass event in the U.S. was O.J. Simpson's, in 1995. 150 million people watched the verdict, and not just there. People on Bloor St. gathered to listen over car radios.

The main lesson of that trial was: if you have lots of money, you have a decent chance at beating a murder charge, as Simpson did. If not, you'll be crushed by the weight of the forces of Law & Order, DumDum. (The TV franchise had recently debuted.)

There was no one to like at that trial; everyone was already a star -- O.J., the lawyers -- or auditioning for their own show on cable, still in an early phase: Kato Kaelin got guest parts in Celebrity Boot Camp; Greta Van Susteren anchored on Fox News; prosecutor Marcia Clark did ET and other dreck.

Derek Chauvin's trial isn't in L.A. and no one seems to be career-building. It probably wouldn't be televised except for the limits imposed by COVID, and there are likable people -- especially in the first week, when witnesses to the killing testified. It reminded you that jury trials can be democratic mementos.

Like a mixed martial-arts fighter who happened on the event. As the legal titans held a sidebar to decide if he counts as an expert, the camera stayed on him, shaking his head in a worldly wise way. Charles McMillian, a local elder who broke down watching the tape. Kids and teens: "I was sad and kind of mad ... I felt like I was failing him."

They were blunt yet eloquent.

The lawyer-narrator in the classic novel Anatomy of a Murder mused about that quality after a witness told how a defendant entered a bar, killed someone and left -- "like he was the mailman delivering mail." He'd always been struck by poetry like that.

It became less interesting (and inspiring) when cops and experts took over in week two -- though the lawyers still had to keep an eye out for class and race elements on the jury. So Chauvin's lawyer gave as an example of a defendant "bargaining" with cops: "Hey man, just lemme sit down on the curb and I won't make trouble." Not something he'd say himself in that situation, but reflective enough of offensive stereotypes.

There was one revelation. All those cute TV medical examiners (ME, or coroners in Canadian) like Ducky in NCIS, and ironic forensic pathologists are really a deep part of the Law & Order complex, like cops, prosecutors and judges. Yet they've somehow steered clear of that image till now. Maryland's former chief ME, who'd moved to the U.S. from South Africa in 1991, gave what looked like a pretty lax account of George Floyd's cause of death, as a witness for Chauvin. It turns out he was involved in a strikingly similar case in 2018: handcuffed Black man held in "prone" position so he couldn't breathe and died. He's being sued over it.

There was even a Canadian moment, courtesy of another former ME called by the prosecution. She was asked by Chauvin's lawyer about a Canadian study that says the prone position -- in Floyd's case, crushed into the pavement by four cops on top of him -- has produced no deaths in Canada.

"Isn't that amazing," she marvelled. "Canada ... I don't know what's different." She said there's not a forensic pathologist in the U.S. who hasn't seen deaths from that tactic before Chauvin's exasperated lawyer cut her off with an objection.

Both sides (as if there's always two) have now "rested." They'll be back Monday to sum up, then it goes to the jury. So we'll see.

It would be crazy to overstate the importance of this event. It's basically symbolic. In fact "events" themselves are essentially symbolic, compared to the slow seismic causes moving underneath. Obama's election wasn't nothing, but it was basically symbolic and disappointing compared to hopes it aroused. The same holds for the end of South African apartheid in the early '90s.

It's a bit like therapy. There are exciting breakthrough moments that almost always fade compared to the deep, slow changes that people sometimes manage to make. Meanwhile, moments help sustain you.

Rick Salutin writes about current affairs and politics. This column was first published in the Toronto Star.

Image credit: Lorie Shaull/Flickr

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.