The B-Word

15 posts / 0 new
Last post
robbie_dee
The B-Word

 

robbie_dee

quote:


The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates “a paradigm of shame and indignity” for all women.

But conversations over the last week indicate that the “b-word” (as it is referred to in the legislation) enjoys a surprisingly strong currency — and even some defenders — among many New Yorkers.

And Ms. Mealy admitted that the city’s political ruling class can be guilty of its use. As she circulated her proposal, she said, “even council members are saying that they use it to their wives.”

The measure, which 19 of the 51 council members have signed onto, was prompted in part by the frequent use of the word in hip-hop music. Ten rappers were cited in the legislation, along with an excerpt from an 1811 dictionary that defined the word as “A she dog, or doggess; the most offensive appellation that can be given to an English woman.”

While the bill also bans the slang word “ho,” the b-word appears to have acquired more shades of meaning among various groups, ranging from a term of camaraderie to, in a gerund form, an expression of emphatic approval. Ms. Mealy acknowledged that the measure was unenforceable, but she argued that it would carry symbolic power against the pejorative uses of the word. Even so, a number of New Yorkers said they were taken aback by the idea of prohibiting a term that they not only use, but do so with relish and affection.

“Half my conversation would be gone,” said Michael Musto, the Village Voice columnist, whom a reporter encountered on his bicycle on Sunday night on the corner of Seventh Avenue South and Christopher Street. Mr. Musto, widely known for his coverage of celebrity gossip, dismissed the idea as absurd.

“On the downtown club scene,” he said, munching on an apple, the two terms are often used as terms of endearment. “We divest any negative implication from the word and toss it around with love.”

Darris James, 31, an architect from Brooklyn who was outside the Duplex, a piano bar in the West Village, on Sunday night was similarly opposed. “Hell, if I can’t say bitch, I wouldn’t be able to call half my friends.”

They may not have been the kinds of reaction that Ms. Mealy, a Detroit-born former transit worker serving her first term, was expecting. “They buried the n-word, but what about the other words that really affect women, such as ‘b,’ and ‘ho’? That’s a vile attack on our womanhood,” Ms. Mealy said in a telephone interview. “In listening to my other colleagues, that they say that to their wives or their friends, we have gotten really complacent with it.”

The resolution, introduced on July 25, was first reported by The Daily News. It is being considered by the Council’s Civil Rights Committee and is expected to be discussed next month.


Full Story: [url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?_r=1&oref]Michael M. Grynbaum, "It’s a Female Dog, or Worse. Or Endearing. And Illegal?" New York Times, August 7, 2007[/url].

Michelle

Cripes. This is the reason why NO words should be banned!

This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. I'm sorry, I don't like being called a bitch, but to make it illegal?

jrose

I'd like to see how they go about catching, prosecuting and punishing this one!

Michelle

I'd like to see how this could possibly be the least bit constitutional, considering American free speech values.

robbie_dee

In the excerpt above, Mealy acknowledges that the ban is unenforceable, but argues it has symbolic effect to encourage people to change their behavior.

500_Apples

quote:


Originally posted by robbie_dee:
[b]In the excerpt above, Mealy acknowledges that the ban is unenforceable, but argues it has symbolic effect to encourage people to change their behavior.[/b]

The symbolic value is in cheapening the law by adding more laws people will disrespect.

torontoprofessor

The NYC council did [i]not[/i] make the N word illegal. Rather, the council passed a [url=http://webdocs.nyccouncil.info/textfiles/Res%200693-2007.htm?CFID=344403..., which reads as follows (after a list of [i]whereas this[/i]es and [i]whereas that[/i]s): "Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York declares a symbolic moratorium on the use of the "N" word in New York City." Given that nothing has been made illegal -- in fact, I believe that the resolution does not even count as a [i]law[/i] -- the resolution is perfectly constitutional.

Presumably, they would pass the same kind of resolution concerning the B word. There would be no law; nothing would be made illegal; and no constitutional issue would arise.

Boze

quote:


Originally posted by 500_Apples:
[b]

The symbolic value is in cheapening the law by adding more laws people will disrespect.[/b]


Then I must wholeheartedly endorse it!!

Michelle

Oh, okay. My misunderstanding. I thought, from the title of the article and all, that it they actually attempted to make it illegal.

I have no problem with the action now.

BenParsons

Study your updated NewSpeak dictionary to learn this months acceptible lexicon.

remind remind's picture

Piss off Ben, thanks!

Sven Sven's picture

The NYC Council cannot make any word “illegal”. They could pass an ordinance but the ordinance itself would be illegal (it would ultimately be trumped by the Constitution).

That being said, there is an aspect about this that I like and another aspect I don’t like.

I like the idea that the council is attempting to make a cultural (as opposed to a legal) statement about civility. Referring to women, generally, as “bitches” or “ho’s” is just uncivil and if this resolution makes people think twice about that usage of those words, then that’s a good thing.

The aspect about the council’s action that I don’t like is that it represents government meddling with speech (it’s the free speech purist in me). But, really, as long as there is no legal effect to the resolution, this aspect is largely, if not totally, mitigated.

Sven Sven's picture

quote:


from the OP:
[b]an excerpt from an 1811 dictionary that defined the word as “A she dog, or doggess; the most offensive appellation that can be given to an English woman.”[/b]

I know that the (euphemistic) "c-word" existed in 1811. I'd say that word is a far more offensive appellation than the (euphemistic) "b-word".

But, what [b][i]really[/b][/i] gets me riled up is the "m-word" followed closely by the "d-word", the "e-word" and the very pernicious "g-word".

remind remind's picture

What is it something in the air today, that some people at babble are so deliberately trolling, or what?

[ 09 August 2007: Message edited by: remind ]