Election results Obama has won, now what?

105 posts / 0 new
Last post
NorthReport

Hopelessness You Can Believe In
Why Obama is scarier than George W. Bush

 

http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A320830

 

People think things will be better four years from now, but there's little reason for hope. America faces radical problems. Radical problems require radical solutions. Unfortunately, Obama's proposals, and the moderates and conservatives with whom he has filled his cabinet, are woefully inadequate to the challenges at hand.

Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman calculates that there's at least a $2.1 trillion hole in the economy—an "output gap" between production capacity and consumers' ability to buy goods. Filling that hole would require direct investment (like Obama's public works proposal) of at least $1.5 trillion. But Obama's plan only contains $355 billion, of which only $136 billion would be spent within the next two years. It's better than nothing, but not by much. Obama wants to plug a gushing artery with a Band-Aid one-tenth the size of the wound.

It's churlish to predict that Obama's approach won't work. But even Obama admits it won't. He promises to create 4 million new jobs by 2011. But we're currently losing 4 million jobs every five months. If Obama delivers, 25 million Americans will have lost their jobs by 2011. (The math differential is due to the fact that population growth increases the workforce by 2.8 million jobs annually.) With unemployment figures like that, no one will doubt that we're in a real depression: bread lines, suicides, the whole bit.

saga saga's picture

Quote:

Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman calculates that there's at least a $2.1 trillion hole in the economy—an "output gap" between production capacity and consumers' ability to buy goods. Filling that hole would require direct investment (like Obama's public works proposal) of at least $1.5 trillion. But Obama's plan only contains $355 billion, of which only $136 billion would be spent within the next two years. It's better than nothing, but not by much. Obama wants to plug a gushing artery with a Band-Aid one-tenth the size of the wound.

This just sounds like republican griping and fear mongering to me.

And not sound analysis either:

a $2.1 trillion hole in the economy—an "output gap" between production capacity and consumers' ability to buy goods

How many companies are always operating at 'capacity' ?

Not many I bet.

So taxpayers are supposed to "fill the gap" so they can reap max profits?

I don't think so!

They can do 'survival' just like the rest of us.

But from the same paper ... I like this approach ... 

http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A320319

If broke consumers are the problem, shoveling money into their pockets is the way to get them spending again. Where do we get it? The reason Willie Sutton robbed banks, he supposedly said, was because "that's where the money is." These days, the money is in the hands of corporations and rich individuals.

Tax returns give only a partial picture of a nation whose riches have been aggregated in the hands of a tiny elite. "The Internal Revenue Service," reported The New York Times in 2007, "captures only about 70 percent of business and investment income, most of which flows to upper-income individuals, because not everybody accurately reports such figures." So actual income inequality is bigger than IRS data indicates.

Even so, the IRS finds a huge pay gap between the very rich and the rest of us. "The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans earned 21.2 percent of all income in 2005," the most recent year for which IRS data is available, according to a 2007 piece in The Wall Street Journal.

What if we played Karl Marx and left that 1 percent of the population (people who earn over $350,000 a year) with their fair share—1 percent of national income? If we divided the rest of the loot equally, everyone else—99 percent—would get a 20.2 percent pay raise.

I don't know about you, but I could use it. And because I'm a patriot, I pledge to fritter away half of my 20.2 percent windfall on wine, women and frivolous American-made consumer goods.

me too!

The gap is similar in Canada, and increasing ...

[url=http://www.esnips.com/doc/629185b2-3bf1-407b-88ee-5a4c5ae0ffc7/Wealth-Di... distribution in Canada: 1987, 1999, 2005[/url]

and of course lots of money also doesn't even show up (gone 'offshore' ya know!) First time I've seen an estimate at 30% of business and investment income being unaccounted for. yikes!

However, rather than proportionate redistribution, I suggest the people at the low end get more ... or ... hey! ... we all get a guaranteed annual income.

Guaranteed consumers!

They should go for that, eh?

 

Ken Burch

Then again, had McCain won, we would be facing a future in which no progressive victories would ever be possible.   And everyone knows it.  So, rather than bashing the guy who did win, why not mobilize to use the political space that now exists to make things better?

What is the point of continuing to try to retroactively campaign for Ralph?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________ Our Demands Most Moderate are/ We Only Want The World! -James Connolly

NorthReport

Obama's honeymoon is over.

Sorry Mr Bush Laughing

I haven't forgiven George W. Bush for stealing two elections, starting two wars, bankrupting the treasury and doing his damnedest to turn the U.S. into a fascist state. He deserves one of hell's hottest picnic spots for refusing to lift a finger to bring the 9/11 murderers to justice. Bush was stupid. He was vicious. He should be in prison.

He was the worst president the U.S. had ever had. Until this one.

On major issues and a lot of minor ones, Obama is the same as or worse than Bush. But Bush had an opposition to contend with. Obama has a compliant Democratic Congress. Lulled to somnolent apathy by Obama's charming manners, mastery of English (and yes, the color of his skin), leftist activists and journalists have been reduced to quiet disappointment, mild grumbling and unaccountable patience.

I don't care about window dressing. Sure, it's nice that Obama is intelligent. But policies matter--not charm. And Obama's policies are at least as bad as Bush's.

 

http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/

Pages