Come on. Philosophical questions and academic polices are not resloved or determined through a yes/no questionnaire. That's how internet quizzes work. It's fairly clear through the material presented (that you clearly have not bothered to look at) that Rancourt follows a radical pedagogy at odds with conventional methods. You choose to view this as 'he gives 'em all A+s! Lawl!' rather than addressing his philosophical underpinnings. Is this because you are dishonest or because you are out of your depth?
I'm beginning to understand that what you really object to is radicalism. The idea that you suggest I think any insubordination is dissent because I sympathize with Rancourt's action demonstrates you have an understanding of neither radicalism nor dissent. That explains your thoughtless contributions to this discussion and your utter lack of intellectual rigor.
But, there are millions of people who are afraid of radicalism. They tuned in to watch the half-time show at the Superbowl (and all the attendant commercials, natch!). Go Cardinals!