depression blame game

12 posts / 0 new

Last post

Wed, 2009-04-15 07:52

thanks

noticed this banker/puppet tactic?

blame the victime, yet again.

now, anyone who names the economic realities for what they are is 'reducing confidence', and 'being pessimistic'.

they're even spinning out 'studies' on this.

here's a study:

define 'denial'

define 'distraction'

define reality-

people are depressed because bankers and their policy puppets have crashed the economy and these jokers are merrily continuing with depressing investment deals with Colombia (!?), the EU (experts at corporate colonialism), and others.

Harper, Iggy and the rest of their banking buddies don't know how to do anything different.

One track minds.

According to them, it's our problem. Yes, folks, we who are struggling and suffering are the cause of the global meltdown. The welfare moms strike again.

Think again.

And push these jokers out of office.

Wed, 2009-04-15 10:05

nussy

kick them out.....and then what? Who will replace them?

Wed, 2009-04-15 11:28

remind

You aren't serious are nussy?

Wed, 2009-04-15 11:32

nussy

yes I am.....they do have to be kicked out...but who in Canada could replace them at this point of time? Who is in any position to take power from them if we had an election?

Wed, 2009-04-15 11:51

thanks

what about an NDP-Green coalition?

not a merger, make up some kind of agreement of cooperation.

bring over any caring human beings from the Libs and Cons.

Wed, 2009-04-15 11:52

thanks

and any persons from the Bloc.

Wed, 2009-04-15 11:52

remind

Anyone nussy, for no one could possibly be worse.

Wed, 2009-04-15 12:02

nussy

but first they have to be elected. The greens dont have any members..and the NDP cannot do it on their own. The Bloc is not interested in Canada....forget the Conservatives....the Liberals are only interested in taking power on thier own.

Wed, 2009-04-15 12:09

remind

Well nussy when one starts with the assumption no one can take power from them, or no one else can run things, then one is not encouraging the election of others, eh?!

Wed, 2009-04-15 17:25

#10

martin dufresne

Some times, try as one may, one cannot sustain a significant election...

Wed, 2009-04-15 18:57

#11

thanks

the greens have significant sway, in my opinion. people vote certain ways at elections given the options at the time.

IF there was a way to strike a working/taskforce/both-and kind of arrangement that would see combinations of the best policies included, needed for this times, i think this would provide a fresh approach that would draw many.

These are extremely unusual times- a coalescing of economic and ecological crises. Surely we can find creative ways of rising to the occasion..

Wed, 2009-04-15 19:03

#12

thanks

and i think i'm going to talk about now as humanitarian, economic and ecological crises. the mass slaughters being conducted around the world, with no means of prevention... one after another...the world is completely out of control. somehow the publics of the planet have to restrain the private abusers.