Is male violence against women turning into a pandemic?

42 posts / 0 new
Last post
martin dufresne
Is male violence against women turning into a pandemic?

A piece I found copied onto a DV shelters internet list.

"52 Days of Domestic Violence Flu in America"
by Casey Gwinn, Family Justice Center Alliance, USA, May 3, 2009

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

There have been 12 mass killings in the last 52 days in the United States.
 In 11 of the 12, the killer had a history of abuse against women or they
were directly related to or defined as domestic violence.

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

This week I have been reflecting on those that would choose to ignore the
importance of dealing with domestic violence in America. After over 30
years of the modern domestic violence movement, we still struggle for
funding, we face budget cuts and reductions when the economy goes bad (though
domestic violence rises) and we rarely are the primary focus of public policy
makers in America. This week the news is consumed with coverage of the
swine flu, an important public health issue in America. As of May 2, there
have been 167 confirmed cases of the swine flu in the United States and one
death. But there has been little news about the mass killings of 68 people
across America in the last 52 days, with men doing all the killing and
virtually all related to men with a history of violence against women.

Public health officials in the United States fear a global pandemic from
the so-called H1-N1 virus. A pandemic is defined as a global outbreak of
disease that causes serious illness or death and then spreads easily from
person to person worldwide. Pandemics differ from seasonal outbreaks of an
illness. The news this week quoted many officials talking about high
levels of illness, death, social disruption, and economic loss from pandemics.
We must all be vigilant about addressing swine flu in the days ahead. But
the pandemic of violence by men against women, men, and children has
killed more people in the last 52 days in America than swine flu. This
pandemic has been going on now for hundreds of years causing high levels of mental
and physical illness, death, social disruption, and economic loss.

There have been 12 mass killings in the last 52 days in the United States.
 In 11 of the 12, the killer had a history of abuse against women or they
were directly related to or defined as domestic violence. 68 people have
been killed in those mass killings including 20 children and 7 police
officers.

Let's honor those who have been killed in the pandemic of domestic
violence flu by identifying their killer and listing them:

March 10 - Michael McLendon, 28, killed ten people, including his mother,
grandmother, aunt and uncle, and the wife and child of a local sheriff's
deputy in rural Alabama. He then killed himself. The worst mass killing in
the history of Alabama killed: Virginia White, 74; James White, 55; Tracy
Wise, 34; Dean Wise, 15; James Starling, 34; Lisa McClendon, Michael's
mom; Bruce Maloy, 51; Andrea Myers, 31; and Corrine Gracy Myers, 18 months.

March 21 - Lovelle Mixon, a parolee with a history of violence against
women, sexual assault, and other violent crimes shot and killed four heroic
Oakland police officers - Sgt. Mark Dunakin, 40; Officer John Hege, 41, SWAT
Sgt. Ervin Romans, 43; and SWAT Sgt. Daniel Sakai, 35 before he was shot
and killed by police.

March 29 - Robert Stewart, 45, shot and killed eight people at Pinelake
Health and Rehab Center in Robbins, North Carolina. He came to the center
seeking to kill his wife, Wanda Neal, 43, a nurse's assistant. She was
working in the Alzheimers Unit when he entered the facility and survived after
herding residents into the TV Room and locking the door. The dead
included: Tessie Garner, 88; Lillian Dunn, 89, Jessie Musser, 88; Bessie Hendrick,
 78; John Goldston, 78; Margaret Johnson, 89; Louise Decker, 98; and Jerry
Avent, 39. Jerry was a newly hired nurse at the facility. He was shot 27
times but continued protecting patients until the final shot. Police
estimated his efforts saved at least ten others patients and staff members.

March 30 - Devan Kalathat killed six people in a murder-suicide in Santa
Clara, California including his children. During his rampage he shot his
wife, but she still clings to life in critical condition. Police identified
the victims as Kalathat's children: 11-year-old Akhil Dev and 4-year-old
Negha Dev; Kalathat's brother-in-law Ashok Appu Poothemkandi, 35,
Poothemkandi's wife, Suchitra Sivaraman, 25; and the Poothemkandis' infant daughter,
Ahana Ashok.

April 4 - Pittsburgh police officers Eric Kelly, Stephen Mayhle, and Paul
Scuillo were shot and killed responding to a "domestic disturbance" call.
They were ambushed by Richard Poplawski when they arrived at the house.
Officer Eric Kelly was not on duty. He was on his way home to his wife and
three daughters when he heard the call on his radio and responded to
support his fellow officers.

April 5 - James Harrison killed his five children in Pierce County, WA
while his wife was at work. Police confirmed that the couple had a domestic
violence incident earlier in the day and the wife had left. The husband
demanded that she return and while she was away he methodically shot Maxine,
Samantha, Heather, Jamie, and James. The first four children were shot in
their beds. The last child was shot as she was running toward the
bathroom.

April 5 - Kirby Revelus, 23, killed his 17 year old sister, Samantha and
his five year old sister, Bianca. Police officers responding to a domestic
violence incident shot and killed him as he was trying to kill his 9 year
old sister Sarafina.

April 7 - Kevin Garner fled Greenville, Alabama late in the afternoon
after setting fire to his wife's home and car. Hours later, police found his
wife and daughter, and her sister and her sister's son shot to death
inside the burning home. Garner later shot himself before being apprehended.

April 10 - Two students at Henry Ford Community College were found dead
in a murder-suicide in the Fine Arts Building on campus in Dearborn,
Michigan. Police determined that Anthony Powell, 28, killed Asia McGowan, 20 with
a shotgun and then turned the gun on himself.

April 18 - Christopher Allan Wood, 34, an accountant for a railroad
operator, killed his wife, Frances, and his three children in Middletown,
Maryland before taking his own life with gunshot to the head. Chandler was 5
years old, Gavin was 4, and his daughter, Fiona, was 2 years old when she was
shot and stabbed by her Dad.

April 19 - William Parente, 59, killed his wife, Betty, 58, and daughters
Catherine, 11, and Stephanie, 19 before killing himself in Garden City,
New York. Each of the victims was killed by asphyxiation and blunt force
trauma.

April 25 - University of Georgia professor George Zinkhans shot and
killed his wife, Marie Bruce, and two of her friends from a local community
theatre group in Bogart, Georgia. Two others were seriously injured by bullet
fragments. Her two murdered colleagues were: Ben Teague, 63, and Tom
Tanner, 40. More than 200 police officers are currently searching for him the
dense woods near Bogart, 60 miles east of Atlanta. Police believe Marie
was preparing to get a restraining order, file for divorce, and leave him
after a history of domestic violence.

So, we are not done. We all must re-double our efforts to raise
awareness, call for more resources in the war by men against women and children.
We must call it what it is...it is not Violence Against Women. It is most
often Violence By Men Against Women. All the killers in the mass killings
of the last 52 days have been men.

The next time you hear someone say they cannot afford to keep a Family
Justice Center or domestic violence shelter program open because of the
economy, ask them to read this article. Next time, you hear someone say that we
don't need any new, evolving, innovative approaches to family violence
prevention because our current service delivery models are doing the job
well; ask them to read the list of 68 names from the most recent 52 bloody days
of domestic violence in 2009. Don't be silent; don't let elected
officials, or policy makers, or bureaucrats, or disinterested community members
ignore the tragedy of domestic violence. We must address swine flu in
America and around the world but we must also take guns away from men who are
violent and start spending the time, energy, and money necessary to stop the
pandemic of violence by men against women that is destroying families,
killing women, men, and children, and continuing to destroy the lives of so
many.
Source: http://www.familyjusticecenter.org/blog/ 
 

remind remind's picture

hey Alberta and BC  governments you need to pay attention!

jas
martin dufresne

From the second of these news stories:

"A 49-year-old former Winnipeg man shot his wife and daughter and then himself in their home, an autopsy confirmed Thursday.

RCMP discovered the bodies of Kerry Saltel, his wife 47-year-old Gail and their 17-year-old daughter Erika ...

"They were the good, kind, responsible citizens that every community is proud to have in their midst," ... Kerry was terminally ill with colon cancer, and Gail had taken over most of the work of running the business.

...Gina Goldie said the strain from Kerry's illness had visibly worn his wife down. Goldie said she last talked to Gail on Monday, when the women were cleaning their adjoining yards.

"She wasn't very happy," Goldie said..."

There has been a spate of such killings in Quebec recently where a self-centered man opts for what the media sometimes call an "extended suicide". No one can tell of course - and I'll probably be berated for saying it - but Gail Saltel and her daughter would probably still be alive if they had NOT been so good, kind and responsible and had left their despondent murderer to his fate.

jas

Yeah, that story really bothers me, especially the way it was reported. There seemed to be a lot of compassion for the father/murderer, I suppose because he was terminally ill. Most murder-suicide reports will take pains to paint a picture of what went down in the last minutes of the victims' lives, but here there was no description of how the murder took place, what exactly occurred. Instead, the town is "confused and saddened" by it, and that "people are walking past that little shop and feeling that something is missing". The lack of information and the gentle reporting seems to want to imply that the mother and daughter were in some kind of pact with the father. We have no idea if that is the case, but certainly nothing was written about the father's decision to prematurely end his daughter's life - because his own was ending? Wtf.

 

martin dufresne

His daughter's and his wife's.

Good point about the media,s suggestion of their participation in a pact. There seems to be a cookie-cutter quality to the coverage of these familicides, where it's just a tragedy with everyone coresponsible and God forbid we should blame the killer. (Maybe people are scared that other family men will get similar ideas if we're disrespectful. Or that family women will decide to put the family out of harm's way.)

I am also noticing killings by sons, close neighbours or other men who had come to take a woman's nurturing for granted and simply take her along in spite when they decide to end their miserable life.

remind remind's picture

Wonderful mentality, "if I can't live, neither can you"!

Refuge Refuge's picture

I think that violence against women has always been a pandemic for cultures/societies that actively promote violence in general to it's members.

remind remind's picture

What societies haven't?

Refuge Refuge's picture

I guess I just mean that it is in proportion to the amount that it is promoted. 

They have done studies of towns that had no tv (a medium used to promote violence), when they got cable the sociolgists gleefully looked at before and after data and violence went up 160%.

martin dufresne

Thanks for that hyperlink, Refuge. This is extremely useful. especially since television is often used as a "pacifier" in institutional settings: child care, senior care, hospitals, etc.

remind remind's picture

Thanks refuge interesting, but why did you use the owrd "gleefully"?

G. Muffin

remind wrote:

Thanks refuge interesting, but why did you use the owrd "gleefully"?

From the article: 

Quote:
Now, hard science types routinely denigrate sociology for its lack of controlled experiments, ignoring the fact that all field sciences have the same problem. Astronomers don't get to try out different galactic structures in the lab, nor do geologists get to bang continents together to see what happens. Like sociologists, they have to find the reasons for things from studying them as they are. In this case, however, there was a beautiful example of a community where the effect of a change in one variable could be observed.

remind remind's picture

Yes, I read that, but I guess that the word "gleeful" has negative considerations for me, so I wondered.

G. Muffin

An article from a few years ago:  http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/mar2005/side-m16.shtml

 

I was trying to find out if there are indicators known for which men are more likely to commit murder-suicides. Does anybody know? Is having your wife be your primary caregiver a factor?

martin dufresne

That would be hard to tell since there are so few instances where a man's wife isn't his primary caregiver.

remind remind's picture

lol martin good 1

G. Muffin

But do you know what I'm trying to ask?

Is it more likely when the man is utterly dependent on his wife? 

remind remind's picture

It is more likely when a man considers his spouse and children to be HIS property.

G. Muffin

And what about a man who proclaims "it's her function" when describing his wife's cooking for, cleaning for, ironing for, shopping for, etc.?  Is that guy more likely to kill his wife?  Should I be even more worried about my mom?

martin dufresne

G.Pie, I have passed on your question to a discussion list of anti-DV front-line activists and analysts. Will post any answers.

Personally, in monitoring such murders in Quebec, I have noticed that women are killed BOTH when they are the murderer's primary caretaker (as wife, mother, grandmother, friend of the family, friendly neighbour) AND when they become ill themselves and a husband finds himself expected to become her caretaker.

In the second case, the mass media which I monitor tend to speak of "compassionate killings", deploring the victim's "loss of quality of life" in recent months. (You can also read that pattern in the Winnipeg Free Press story about Kerry Saltel's crime.)

G. Muffin

martin dufresne wrote:

G.Pie, I have passed on your question to a discussion list of anti-DV front-line activists and analysts. Will post any answers.

Okay, thanks.

martin dufresne
Refuge Refuge's picture

remind wrote:

Yes, I read that, but I guess that the word "gleeful" has negative considerations for me, so I wondered.

G.Pie was right, I meant gleeful about the chance to do a controlled study outside of the labratory, not the results of the experiment. The link between the two had been proven in the labratory but many people (especially those that make their living at it) said the studies weren't recreatable outside the labratory. This one proved them wrong.

remind remind's picture

Okay, thanks, the question now becomes what can be done, now that it has been proven outside the labratory?

martin dufresne

We could attempt to validate the idea that television is really one choice among many entertainment options, one with benefits and major drawbacks (think 40% advertising), just as we can try to wean kids away from ultra-violent video games. (The transition from analog to digital TV seems like a golden opportunity to give any boob tube the boot.)

thanks

hi. thanks for the thread title, martin.

i've been a babble for a little while, observing somewhat, participating somewhat, and for the most part have not commented on items in the feminist forum, or regarding issues of women's rights in other forums/threads, as it seemed like a subject area in this day and age, and given babble/rabble's sponsors, which would already have many people supporting equity and women's rights.

this appears not to be the case. 

i've tossed around the fact that babble likes to have things discussed, to continue highlighting the never-ending battles that women face to have their rights and feelings respected.

i've tossed around the fact that there are many men at babble who getting their energy out, or who perhaps are tired of 'taking on women's issues' themselves and want to devolve that work to women who participate in babble, so they can continue to prod and 'have fun' in their sexist threads, all in the name of promoting debate and discussion of course.

i've tossed around the fact that i've felt personally assaulted from some of the language, and offended by the tone of discussions around 'pre-stripper days', 'porn', and references to rape which seem to almost hold it on a pedestal.

i'm not happy at all with the way babble has dealt with these issues, and in the past i've often just left the forum for a while.

at this point i feel i've seen enough to state that babble has some serious structural issues of its own in this regard.

some men are using women's names to post.  there need to be more real female feminist voices at babble.

i don't feel it's just for me to have to do this every time i visit babble and am faced with a deluge of sexist junk. the sponsors of babble have many associated women who are well paid, which i am not, to do this work.  i don't mind adding my two cents in once in a while, but i find it very offensive to be thrown a truck-load of stuff when i'm at this site. 

i'd appreciate some support in this regard.

also, whatever happened to saga? i miss her voice. although i didn't go into the detail of all the conflicts around these issues, it seems like she was upset with a number of issues around what was in womens' interests.  now she is no longer posting at babble, as far as i'm aware.  i've also read a bit that other feminists have gone.

so if this is some kind of pattern at babble, and from my own experience here i feel that babble is a place where some postings and language are offensive, then aside from clicking on the 'flag as offensive' box in posts, perhaps babble ought to consider recruiting a female feminist to participate more. 

 

 

 

Caissa

some men are using women's names to post.

 

For example?

thanks

i don't want to go into those kind of details Caissa. 

Scout

Here's the thing you can either spell it all out or spare us. Feminists at babble have enough problems without all this conspiracy crap.

I don't miss saga.

remind remind's picture

Digital TV should be given the boot just for how environmentally unfriendly it is. ;)

I long ago ascribed to limited TV viewing for my daughter, and she has followed through with her daughter too. And I was really hard core against any form of fear mongering TV and movies too, as is she. But that is a double edged sword imv.

However, any initiatives along those lines are going to be met with a lot of resistence by those making their living from TV and movies and by those who want status quo maintained.

 

thanks

Scout, there's no conspricacy stuff.  just some reflections for pondering and hopefully people can act in ways which are helpful.  for example, you could use more supportive language in your response. 

remind remind's picture

Scout wrote:
Here's the thing you can either spell it all out or spare us. Feminists at babble have enough problems without all this conspiracy crap.

I don't miss saga.

Me either!

And I have issues too, with this thread being derailed by stuff of alleged conspiracies, when women are dying at the hands of men in huge numbers.

 

Scout

Quote:
some men are using women's names to post.

 
What's helpful about this? How is this "pondering"?
Quote:
for example, you could use more supportive language in your response. 

I'm not interested in supporting suggestions that people are lying about their gender. Either spell out your accusation with concrete
proof or stop posting them. I'm not going to be supportative when your hijacking this thread.
We have had an issue in the past with a male babbler pretending to be a woman and it caused no end of problems. If it's happeneing again prove it or stop.
You said in the past you have left - is this a new handle then?

thanks

support for women needs to happen in conversations at babble, as in the world at large, or its part of the violence.

it is my hope that babblers will not go on about porn, strip shows, and other unhelpful language, don't you think, remind?

thanks

scout i don't understand your question.

thanks

i've learned that it's not helpful for me to continue in situations in which i feel continually assaulted.  i do something else.

sometimes its a gut reaction, sometimes its a conscious reaction, usually its both.  i make my own choices.  i also  have very real time constraints, and while  i like participating in babble at times, at times i don't, because of the factors i've mentioned. 

anyway, i do have to get out again at this point.  i have lists upon lists of work to do, but needed to spend some time here to say these things.

Timebandit Timebandit's picture

I don't think one can actually be "assaulted" on a message board.  Can the melodrama, would you?

If you're going to post allegations publically, then it's up to you to provide the rest of us with a reason to take them seriously.  You've made an inflammatory statement, and other posters are perfectly within their rights to ask you to support it with some form of evidence.  If you don't want to do that, you should take it to the mods.  That's what they're there for.

Refuge Refuge's picture

remind wrote:

Okay, thanks, the question now becomes what can be done, now that it has been proven outside the labratory?

Not being a sociolgist I can't answer that on a societal scale but it is something on a personal level I look at how I cause harm to myself through hours of tv watching, which can skew your reality, as well asother choices I make. If I can become conscience of and reduce the violence that I inflict upon myself I can become more conscious and lessen the violence I inflict upon others. This is the basis of some types of therapy which, when done with a willing person who actually wants to change, can help them.

remind remind's picture

Yes well,  as i said I did not need said study, I long ago realized TV, movie and video violence was not good and my daughter while growing up had strick limits.

However, I guess I meant more about getting said study out to people publically, as we know it will not get any news coverage so....perhaps a a campaign can be created to get PACs involved, and other public information sources?

Noise

Umm back to topic by any chance?  Hate to admit it, when I read the title I had the 'oh great, more fear mongering and hysteria' response...for some reason the word 'pandemic alone is enough to do that now.  Second reaction was 'Does turning into a pandemic imply it wasn't a problem already?'.

First impressions aside...I think this does a good job of showing how domestic violence is viewed as acceptable yet regretable within our society.  I can't tell from the little blurbs given here, but the standard response tends to be to isolate the individual as a monster seperate from us (and the occasional mainstream story giving sympathy for said monster)...something our society couldn't have created therefore not one of us and not a part of us, as unpreventable as a lightning strike.  Of course thats just silly, like a patient hearing a lung cancer diagnosis trying to deny their lung is a part of them.

So how do you create the link between our society and DV in a very solid way (the study mentioned by Refuge?) and how to you bring awareness to this on a level that rivals whatever pandemic scare we should be afraid of next, when it's something thats engrained into our society for longer than capitalism or nationalism? I guess I just repeated what Remind posted above.

 

Refuge first, Reminds response:

Quote:
I think that violence against women has always been a pandemic for cultures/societies that actively promote violence in general to it's members.

...

What societies haven't?

Quite a few...but I think we've had that discussion before.  I think it's important to note that there has been past instances and patriarchy is not a natural human state...it's a false social construct that we accept and propagate (kinda like nationalism ^^).

NDPP

"A very Masculine occupation, again on a symbolic level and maybe not so symbolic, that draws its strength, its force, its continuity, from severing the Feminine--by detaining it, keeping it paralyzed, mute, immobilized, in waiting..in waiting...Who will deliver the Feminine in Iraq? Where is the Midwife of Deliverance?"

Abandoned

Layla Anwar  http://www.arabwomanblues.blogspot.com/2009/05/abandoned.html