Global special on Tar Sands

11 posts / 0 new
Last post
Noah_Scape
Global special on Tar Sands

       The Alberta Tar Sands, AKA Syncrude, together with Global TV, are putting on a propaganda drive which they call "an opportunity to tell our own story".  Framing this publicity stunt like that allows them to have this Global TV air time without rebuttals, and sure enough there are only the briefest of moments given to critics.

    Apparently Syncrude feels the environmentalists are getting all the air time, but not many who watch the news would agree with that.

   One item on this special is the Buffalo that roam the reclaimed land where tar sands mining has taken place. Syncrude spokespeople are gleefully pointing out that these Buffalo are healthy. I cannot argue with them on that, they probably are healthy, but that only shows that the reclaimed lands are okay and ignores the fact of the active mining areas being so toxic. Furthermore, to only show these Buffalo and none of the humans in the area - esp. the Fort Chipwayan native communties - who are suffering high rates of cancers and other health problems that are almost certainly the result of living "nearby and downstream" of the tar sands operations. Hurray for the Buffalo, Syncrude sweeps the human suffering under the table, and Global TV plays along. Such tactics as this almost define the word "inhumane".

 

  This Global TV special is chock full of misleading statements. Everyone has heard that the tar sands operations are so large that they can be seen from outer space, so Syncrdue answers that by stating that the amount of Boreal forest that is removed there "is less than one-tenth of one percent" of Canada's boreal forest.

   Gee, that is not a large portion is it? I squirm everytime I hear an oilman using "percents"... just like they used to say the toxins in  the air amount to "less than one percent" -  but now we know that the amount that does harm is in the parts per million... and that global warming occurs when the atmosphere has 450 parts per million CO2, etc etc.

 I could go on and on, and sometimes I do, but if you want to believe the tar sands are a good idea then what I say isn't going to change your mind. I just wanted to point out the Global TV collusion in this propaganda drive.

 

 

 

Sandy47 Sandy47's picture

Fair and balanced, Canadian style...

HeywoodFloyd

There's an easy solution: Quit buying our gas, heating oil, propane, butane, sulphur, and the like. Problem solved.

remind remind's picture

Bit symplistic eh, heywood?

Besides accurately speaking, it is not "yours", when you say "our".

Buddy Kat

Noah_Scape says " esp. the Fort Chipwayan native communties - who are suffering high rates of cancers and other health problems that are almost certainly the result of living "nearby and downstream" of the tar sands operations."

 

So why don't the native communities take these corporations to court. The government has brought in victims of terrorism legislation. Remember a terror group is defined as any group besides protest groups that endangers the health, safety or life of innocent people or the public. Could it be all "al queda" had to do was incorporate to get away with terror, legally.

 

 

HeywoodFloyd

remind wrote:

Bit symplistic eh, heywood?

Besides accurately speaking, it is not "yours", when you say "our".

It is as much mine as it is any other Albertan's and to a lesser extent any Canadian's.

In either case, if you don't buy Canadian O&G then this problem would largely go away.

Yes, it is a bit simplistic but sometimes problems have a simple answer.

Noise

Unless something has changed...most canadians don't have the option of buying canadian O&G...how is that a solution again Heywood?

HeywoodFloyd

It isn't really. I'm just being grumpy. The solution is to stop buying O&G period.

HeywoodFloyd

Mind you, I know that Enmax has an option to only buy Green Electricity.....for a premium of course. I wonder how many people would be interested in paying a premium for O&G guaranteed not to be from bitumen fields.

Noise

Heh, isn't that also known as a carbon tax that would push the price of the bitumen up?

Enmax has the entire LRT line in Calgary as green energy.  Or atleast they did, it was all windpower for a while.  They pushed a 'buy green electricity' program where they offered to garentee 5% of you consumption came from wind power for 5 bucks or something to that extent...idea was enough people would jump on it to make it economically feasible.   Unsure how it did, but I assume not too well since it's been a long time since it's come up.

Shame...we've probably got the most abundant renewable fuels here, both in sun and wind.

HeywoodFloyd

It could be considered that. However, it's voluntary and I'd be interested in seeing if people would voluntarily chose to buy O&G at a premium like that.