Toronto Star, CJC in homophobic gay panic

93 posts / 0 new
Last post
bento
Toronto Star, CJC in homophobic gay panic

So, Bernie Farber shows up to Pride in his straight, over-middle-aged splendour to march with supposed queer Jewish student contingent Kulanu, and he's wearing a t-shirt that says "Nobody knows I'm gay". But when Antonia Zerbisias ironically says, in a comment to a blog post of hers, that she didn't know he was gay and hadn't seen him at Pride before, apparently, this is cause for GREAT CONCERN in the halls of the CJC, where it is discussed at an executive meeting. Heaven forbid anyone should mistakenly think Farber, a straight man who recently lectured queers on the meaning of Pride, might be gay, not that there's any problem with that! Issue a media statement, call up the Public Editor at the Toronto Star! Lo and behold, a few days later, Kathy English pumps out a fine piece of pandering in which she calls the ironic statement that Farber was gay "distasteful". Yes, it's distasteful to be called gay. 

You know what's distasteful? Homophobic pandering and selling out your journalists. 

Not to mention that Kathy and Bernie just don't seem to have their heads wrapped around this whole blog thing yet. 

Gay Panic at the CJC and the Toronto Star

 

 

hysperia hysperia's picture

Insanity.  It just doesn't take much to see this tempest for exactly what it is.  Why was it beyond the capacity of English and Cruikshank? 

M. Spector M. Spector's picture
remind remind's picture

Have written a letter of objection to the Star, at the link contained in the linked article above.

bento

The Star and Farber are so ridiculous on this that everyone can see it. Even right-wingers like Mark Steyn.

Quote:
I'm not gay, I just falsely claim to be, and then complain about being taken at my word...

Despite the fact that Mr Farber was the first to misidentify himself as gay, the newspaper's ombudswoman devotes an entire column to a characteristically pompous media-ethics snoozefest denouncing the offending columnist for being "tasteless" and getting the paper's apparently brain-dead publisher (my old boss at The Chicago Sun-Times) to do a lot of plonking pro-forma huffing about how the item "fell short of the Star's standards of accuracy, fairness and civility", and reassuring readers that in future systems will be put in place to ensure that the paper is even more unreadable ...whoops, sorry, I mean, systems will be put in place to ensure that non-gays claiming to be gay are not taken at their word without having their gay status confirmed by gay-accredited orientation-checkers. Whatever.

Queer Tee for the Straight Jew

 

 

hysperia hysperia's picture

Holy crap, Mark Steyn wrote something I agree with.  And it's funny too!

Maysie Maysie's picture

How about for next year's Pride fest Bernie simply wears a rainbow t-shirt that says "Nobody Knows I'm Stupid"?

I agree with Mark Steyn too. I have to go lie down now....

martin dufresne

I'm rooting for a "Nobody knows I'm a self-hating Palestinian" T-shirt, worn at a Zionist meeting - these folks don't have to march, they give marching orders to the likes of Iggy.

spatrioter

Canadian Dimension: Bernie Farber is not gay; he is just in an open relationship with the truth

Quote:
The Toronto Star owes apologies for two things out of this column. One, the homophobic suggestion that it was distasteful, almost too distasteful to reprint, to ironically suggest that Farber was gay. And two, the obvious injustice to Zerbisias. Farber is a public figure who misidentified himself as gay at Pride for political reasons, and it’s fair comment to take that on. Zerbisias was just doing her job. And the Star owes her an apology.

Michelle

Maysie wrote:

How about for next year's Pride fest Bernie simply wears a rainbow t-shirt that says "Nobody Knows I'm Stupid"?

Hahaha!

spatrioter

On Canadian media, the CJC and defending the Zerb

Quote:
Kathy English, who left journalism to work in the ivory tower of academia at about the same time DOS was still the standard OS, who has no (known) blogs or experience with digital publishing, and whose Twitter account has five updates and 46 followers, does not come off well deriding the one of the most competent and engaging social media users at the Star.

Cueball Cueball's picture

There is nothing more heartwarming than when a prejudice is overcome with an even deeper prejudice.

Michelle

I think it's hilarious.  He wears a shirt that says, "Nobody knows I'm gay" and then freaks out because someone jokes that they didn't know he was gay.  Uh, dude, if you didn't want people to joke about what your sexual orientation is, then maybe you shouldn't joke about it yourself!

What's sad, though, is that an excellent opinion columnist like Antonia gets trashed for it by her own editor.  That really sucks.  Way to stand by your writers, Toronto Star!

Star Spangled C...

Way to go, Bernie! You've managed to alienate the left and the right with a single stupid action! Mazel tov!!

Maysie Maysie's picture

Okay, now a contest: T-shirt captions that Bernie should have worn.

I'll start.

"I'm not gay but my wife is"

"Am I FABULOUS or is it just me?"

"Straight but not narrow"

"You say I'm straight like it's a bad thing"

"I like straight people as long as they act gay in public"

(Oh wait, it's that kind of behaviour that got him into this mess.)

spatrioter

Is Bernie going to Caribana?

What not to wear: "Nobody knows I'm Black"

hysperia hysperia's picture

hahahaha

martin dufresne

Another T-shirt suggestion for Farber: "I got Zionist settlers 1,000 square miles of Palestinian land, and all I got back was this lousy T-shirt!"

Cueball Cueball's picture

spatrioter wrote:

Is Bernie going to Caribana?

What not to wear: "Nobody knows I'm Black"

Not as funny as you think. I have known a number of white Jewish Zionists who claim that because they are Jewish they are "essentially" black and no one knows it. Someone said this to me as recently as a month ago. This was in the context of people of colour not properly seeing their kinship with white Jewish people, and "wrongly" perceiving them to be part of the dominant white society, instead of an opressed minority. I would not be at all suprised if Farber's thinking moved along these lines in his most recent intellectual embarassment, he has often voiced the kinship he feels with the black "civil rights" movement along these lines in the past, and equating "blackness" and "Jewishness" in this manner is thematic in some Zionist tropes.

martin dufresne

Not unlike the men who try to shoehorn themselves into women's resources, e.g. batterers who claim to be "men in distress" and therefore entitled to crash women's DV shelters, get half of any funds alloted to women, derail realistic public service announcements, etc. Guilting political minorities and scuttling their resources seems to be becoming the flavour of the year.

bento

Where's Winnifred?

spatrioter

It doesn't look like Toronto Star public editor Kathy English or publisher John Cruickshank have many friends in the blogosphere.

Bastard Logic:

Quote:
Perhaps the saddest thing about this chilling, over the top attack on journalistic autonomy and free expression is the fact that Zerbisias has been spanked–publicly–for violating an as-yet unwritten policy.

Canadian Cynic:

Quote:
Sadly, though, Kathy, you were played for a sucker and you played your part beautifully. I'm guessing that, the next time Bernie Farber comes calling, it will be just that much easier to give him whatever he wants. I'm betting he's counting on it.

The Galloping Beaver:

Quote:
English and Cruickshank have just allowed themselves to be had by Farber. He clearly didn't like what Zerb had written in her post, and was looking for a way in. He found it; he trolled it; and English and Cruickshank took the bait.

POGGE:

Quote:
This is not a story about homophobia or anti-semitism (although that implied charge is the second level down). It is a story about brute power, the future Orwell warned us about: "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- forever." And its coming is always facilitated by amoral little note-takers like the public editor of the Toronto Star.

Unrepentant Old Hippie:

Quote:
Only an idiot (and in my opinion, a homophobe) would interpret her comment as an insult — either that or Farber didn’t like some of the other things Zerb had to say, and saw the comment as an opportunity to stop her from saying them.  Pick one, there’s no “neither of the above” option.  That’s called “censorship”, so maybe Zerb should be thanking Farber for making her point.

Dawg's Blog:

Quote:
And then a Star editor and the publisher go into full damage-control mode--except that I can't, as noted, discern any damage. Not, in any case, unless Farber, despite his protestations, thinks that the "gay" label is a stigma, and the Star brass agrees with him. Blogs by Star journalists, says English, "may not put the Star in a negative light." An ironic comment about someone being gay does that?

A Creative Revolution:

Quote:
I guess when you wear a T shirt in a gay pride parade that says  "Nobody knows I am Gay"it means the opposite. Better mentally file that away! Who knew?

Mirabile Dictu:

Quote:
In one way, it’s about a tempest in a teapot, as Dawg says.  That is, if it’s really about whether Antonia Zerbisias called Bernie Farber “gay”.  On the other hand, it’s not, because it’s about trying to intimidate a journalist (believe me, it won’t work!) and access to media – that is, Bernie Farber’s got it and I don’t.

Stageleft:

Quote:
If this article at Rabble about this article in the Toronto Star that was further blogged about here is correct then I believe it can be safely said that someone is trying to shut someone up about discussing activities designed to shut people up.

We Move to Canada:

Quote:
Right now Zerbisias is under attack by her employer, because she had the nerve to speak her mind about Bernie Farber and the Canadian Jewish Congress.

Blamblog:

Quote:
There's even a PHOTO! Then I went and read the full comment thread on Antonia's post (go see for yourself) and found that instead of failing to "abide by the professional and journalistic standards the Star has long strived to uphold", Antonia was there in the thick of her comments section moderating a really tough thread. She was actually doing her job and was smacked down for it

YayaCanada:

Quote:
Farber had his say. That could have been the end of it had the Star's Public Editor not felt called upon to publicly kiss Farber's hiney at the expense of one of her own colleagues. In doing so, she has made laughing stocks of both the Star and the CJC.

Canadian Dimension:

Quote:
Nothing in Antonia Zerbisias’ blog or comments breached any journalistic ethics. The only column that requires a retraction and apology from the Star is English’s. English catered to an oversensitive, high-profile individual — Farber — at the expense of the paper’s journalists and its reputation.

Creekside:

Quote:
Good lord, Star editor and your pompous publisher Cruikshank too, who previously trashed Heather Mallick at CBC for her piece on Sarah Palin, how stupid do you want to look? Get a fucking grip. You think this is about teh gay, or in this case, teh obvious-to-everyone-else not gay? It's about what she wrote in her original post. You got pwned and blindsided by the CJC and you panicked and threw your columist under a gay bus to prove it. Shame on you.

Feminist Christian Socialist:

Quote:
There are so many problems with all of this, not the least of which is why an apology was needed at all. Suppose for a second that Zerbisias wasn't talking tongue-in-cheek. Suppose she really was saying she didn't know he was gay. Why would that require an apology? He was at a Pride parade wearing a shirt that said he was gay! He was photographed wearing it. She wasn't outting someone who wanted to keep his homosexuality a secret. Farber's complaint that she was misrepresenting him as gay is clearly bullshit. Clearly.

hysperia hysperia's picture

Thanks for putting this all together spatrioter. Here's some US coverage:  http://nlgjareact.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/oh-canada/

al-Qa'bong

Quote:
Quote:If this article at Rabble about this article in the Toronto Star that was further blogged about here is correct then I believe it can be safely said that someone is trying to shut someone up about discussing activities designed to shut people up.

 

Something's wrong with post #11.

Gus Williams

I have no opinion on whether the Star should have written their editorial but I do wonder about the fuss made regarding the "Nobody Knows I'm gay" t-shirt. These t-shyirts have been around for a number of years. I first saw them in San Fransisco where a group of straight men and women wore them in the Pride parade. Google has loads of explanations on the shirt traditionally worn at Pride parades by straight people as a sign of solidarity with gays and lesbians. Its a political message not a sexual one.

Unionist

Gus Williams wrote:

I have no opinion on whether the Star should have written their editorial but I do wonder about the fuss made regarding the "Nobody Knows I'm gay" t-shirt.

Zerbisias made an ironic crack about it, and your buddy Farber freaks out, raises it at a CJC executive committee meeting, and launches a crusade against her. The root of the whole thing, of course, is Farber's terror that Israeli apartheid is being exposed in one more venue - the Pride parade. So you should tell the thug-like humourless champions of Israel at the CJC (your friends) not to make such a "fuss", because no one else did. The current fuss is in response to Farber donning, not a T-shirt, but his favourite duds: the robes of Torquemada.

 

spatrioter

Xtra:

Quote:
You could march in a gay pride parade but then get really mad when a journalist comments on it and demand an apology from the paper's spineless editor who reprimands said journalist in an embarrassing display for the entire profession in Canada.  Nah, that's too ridiculous to ever really happen.

Caissa

T-shirt for Bernie

 

"Zionist Orientation"

johnpauljones

If i was a person who believed in conspiracies i would say that the star and antonia collaborated on this very blog post and "retraction"  look at how much time is being spent talking about the star.

 

You see the star has accomplished 2 very important things. 1 the blog post in question -- and remember it was a post in a blog catered to the anti-cjc crowd.

 

the retraction catered to the pro-cjc crowd

 

why do that unless you want to keep the story alive.

 

The star is one of the few papers that never apologizes for anything. they like to try to piss everyone off at all times.

So I am just asking what the alterior motive could be...

M. Spector M. Spector's picture

The Star always bends over backwards to avoid pissing off the Zionists. They do it again this time and you wonder what their motive is? Get a grip.

martin dufresne

If i was a person who believed in conspiracies i would say that the star and antonia collaborated on this very blog post and "retraction"

I am a person who believes in conspiracies and one of the worst is that whenever a woman is badly mistreated, someone manages to blame her for it, to suggest that it's a ruse and that she has a vested interest in the matter...

 

hysperia hysperia's picture

Zerbisias' mistreatment by The Star is in itself more than a little, er, "suspicious".  She's a feminist, a high number of her columns and blogs address feminist issues and pull not a single punch and, of course, she's a woman.  It's not often that such a journalist attracts this kind of high level attention and warrants the publication of a full column because of a brief comment she made in the comments section of a blog on a post written five days earlier.  So the conspiracy is ... ?

johnpauljones

martin when in my post did i ever compare this to any sort of abuse? spousel abuse and violence against women is not anything to be laughed at at all.

and M Spector it is funny to hear that the star bends over backwards to zionists because it is the very zionists that for years have called for a boycott of what they percieve to be the anti-israel star.

Unionist

johnpauljones wrote:

and M Spector it is funny to hear that the star bends over backwards to zionists because it is the very zionists that for years have called for a boycott of what they percieve to be the anti-israel star.

Zionists don't like shades of grey. Some of them even purport to consider Obama as anti-Israel. Attack everyone, and you keep them in line. Think Torquemada.

 

johnpauljones

Unionist you may be correct. then again as far as obama is concerned many never bought into the hype and just never thought that he was or is the saviour that he was made out to be.

time will tell -- but it will be interesting to look back in 4 years as to what  obama has accomplished and to see if he is pro anything and anti anything.

so far imho he is just a bush lite. and usofa did not want bush lite they wanted a new vision and a new beginning.

hysperia hysperia's picture
  • JohnPaulJones, until you said the words "spousal abuse and violence against women", no one did.
remind remind's picture

johnpauljones wrote:
martin when in my post did i ever compare this to any sort of abuse? spousel abuse and violence against women is not anything to be laughed at at all.

In case you do not realize it, work places abuse and exploit women more than men. As does society at large.

In respect to pressure upon the Star by Zionists, I guess the slap lawsuits in BC have been pretty effective eh?!

Unionist

Remind, the Star isn't afraid of the Israel lobby. They just share common interests with them.

 

bento

So, apparently, in response to her epic fail in attacking Antonia Zerbisias and journalistic freedom, Kathy English, in her next column, is going to take the pious tack of talking about why there is so much snark out there?

If they implement a "no snark" policy, does that mean we'll be rid of Rosie di Manno? Jen Gerson makes this and other points in her reply to Kathy English.

 

 

spatrioter

Toronto Star public editor Kathy English says Canadian Jewish Congress CEO Bernie Farber deceived her in making complaint about columnist Antonia Zerbisias:

Quote:
In complaining to the Star, neither did Farber think to tell me that he, along with dozens of others who marched with the Kulanu group, had worn a T-shirt that made its own ironic quip. That's context I sure wish I had known.

Quote:
To be fair to Zerbisias, it should be made clear, though, that she did not "make things up," as Farber interpreted it. "I don't `make things up' – ever," she said, adding that there "is a lot of space between publishing falsehoods and spouting irony."

Unionist

Thanks, spatrioter. It is somewhat unsettling that even after understanding Farber's manipulative attempt to discredit Zerbisias, Ms. English still lacks the decency to apologize to Zerbisias. Hopefully Farber, however, is on the road to being treated as the pariah that he is by news organizations that don't want to be publicly humiliated - even ones like the Star.

remind remind's picture

Wow, the hypocrisy in English"s article is astounding.

The Star's "journalistic standards" are a bunch of propaganda  nonsense.

And she continued to  bash Zerbisias the whole way through, even though she was the one in the wrong.

martin dufresne

I commented. I hope you will, folks.

Gus Williams

spatrioter wrote:

Toronto Star public editor Kathy English says Canadian Jewish Congress CEO Bernie Farber deceived her in making complaint about columnist Antonia Zerbisias:

 

Zerbisias also didn't tell English about the T-Shirt. Did she deceive the public editor as well? Ms. English doesn't come close to accusing Farber of deception. You do and in my books that's pretty close to libel.

One more thing, I noticed everyone seemed to miss this letter to the editor from the director of the Jewish LGBTQ group that sold the T-shirt.

 

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/668141

 

It puts things in proper perspective.

Unionist

Gus Williams wrote:
Ms. English doesn't come close to accusing Farber of deception. You do and in my books that's pretty close to libel.

Look, let's get one thing straight. I accuse Farber of being a sycophant of Israel and of Stephen Harper, and an enemy of the finest traditions of the Jewish people.

Please look it up in "your books" and tell me what that's "pretty close" to.

 

spatrioter

Gus Williams wrote:

Zerbisias also didn't tell English about the T-Shirt. Did she deceive the public editor as well?

The deception took place when Farber pretended to be offended that Zerbisias had supposedly outed him, when he knew she was referencing a t-shirt he had worn.

Zerbisias is not the one who asked English to write a public editorial, so your suggestion that she deceived English is weak.

remind remind's picture

English should have researched the whole damn incident before she reacted and wrote a public commentary against a  Star employee, who is also a well respected national journalist, that would be forever on public record. You just don't attack employees that way, and you just don't react to some low level NPO cultural organization CEO,  and trash one of your finest journalists who is respected  nationally and around the world.

If there were libel suit threats to be thrown around, Antonia is the one who has the biggest reason to.

martin dufresne

GW: I noticed everyone seemed to miss this letter to the editor from the director of the Jewish LGBTQ group that sold the T-shirt.

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/668141

In this letter, Justine Apple claims that Farber "outed himself" on that day...

Hmmm... smells just a little a bit fishy to me, esp. given Farber's faux-outraged response to the article.

Everyone who has evenr gone Yessss!!! reading a Zerbisias column should write in and protest her shoddy treatment at the hands of the Star.

remind remind's picture

I wrote a lengthy letter to The Star about this when it all first started and I have not heard a word back from them,  and I wrote another today to them, after English's comments today, and then I went and voted up all the comments supporting Zerbisias in the 2nd English attack today.

Frankly, no employee should have to put up with such attacks by their employer.

martin dufresne

Absolutely. I am encouraged by the fact that Zerbisias is being vindicated and The Star system being voted down by a tremendous majority of commenters.

Gus Williams

spatrioter wrote:

Gus Williams wrote:

Zerbisias also didn't tell English about the T-Shirt. Did she deceive the public editor as well?

The deception took place when Farber pretended to be offended that Zerbisias had supposedly outed him, when he knew she was referencing a t-shirt he had worn.

Zerbisias is not the one who asked English to write a public editorial, so your suggestion that she deceived English is weak.

How in hell did anyone know that Zerbisias was referencing a T-shirt he wore when Zerbisias never mentioned the damn T-shirt? Re-read her column, not once does she refernce a T-shirt.

And where do you get the idea that Farber asked English to write a column.  I've checked and I see no suggestion from either English or Farber that he "asked" for an article.

Its this typical kind of sleazy innuendo that destroys credibility here.

Pages