“The day we start banning books, we are banning thinking” - Is majority India afraid of different opinions?

RP is this really necessary?

gandhi and nehru wanted a british cocc liccing hindu run gov

fixed used the wrongs words should have said bramin

Rexdale_Punjabi wrote:

more colonialist propoganda most ppl in india are starving/functionally illiterate yet they continue with this shit and the real criminals were gandhi and nehru Jinnah was ok with 1 state he just wanted fair representation for muslims (and I believe maybe other minorities too not sure proly not) while gandhi and nehru wanted a bramin run gov who believe that they are "white aryans" (LOL) and believed white people are superior to them. (cuz quoted it in his autobiography that and that he would give up every son of india to britain if given the chance).

 

Fucc ghandhi cuzz

 

I would read the links but I already know what they gonna say so yea...

(proly read them later)

This is nonsense. Mohandas Gandhi never said any such thing, he did not call for a brahmin government, and he didn't use the expression "white aryans". 

marzo wrote:

Rexdale_Punjabi wrote:

more colonialist propoganda most ppl in india are starving/functionally illiterate yet they continue with this shit and the real criminals were gandhi and nehru Jinnah was ok with 1 state he just wanted fair representation for muslims (and I believe maybe other minorities too not sure proly not) while gandhi and nehru wanted a bramin run gov who believe that they are "white aryans" (LOL) and believed white people are superior to them. (cuz quoted it in his autobiography that and that he would give up every son of india to britain if given the chance).

 

Fucc ghandhi cuzz

 

I would read the links but I already know what they gonna say so yea...

(proly read them later)

This is nonsense. Mohandas Gandhi never said any such thing, he did not call for a brahmin government, and he didn't use the expression "white aryans". 

go look at his autobiography he also believed that higher caste indians were closer to whites and he didnt use the term white aryans but he did use aryan.

 

And why should facts get in the way of a good rant? Facts should be the basis which they are.

 

why dont you just google some shit like truth about gandhi do you really think if he was a real nigga the british would have let him live. Im not even up for arguing facts with white people today but compare the real revolutionaries who fought for independance all over the continent to this [epithet removed]. Str8 up ask ppl who were around that time ask ppl today the image white MSM gives of gandhi is very different from the actual man.

edit - And marzo if you dont know how shit works plz dont say he never called for a bramin governments its like Well Harper never called for a white gov. Is it a white government? Same thing british let bramins in power and to this day they still are and selling the country out to others. Bare are proper but most of the higher follyticians are bramin. That's a fact.

na gandhi wrote that himself in his auto bio and quoted and he said that after the SA days. On top of that a british statesman one time said that it costs us millions to keep gandhi poor ie a lot of it was a publicity scam because at that time britain was quiccly losing control because ppl were rebelling and this was a way to hold onto to the colony.

 

Gandhi and Nehru were on the same side in the end and supported the same power structure.

 

Gandhi himself signed the warrant to hang a lot of the revolutionaries who led rebellions against the british such as Bhagat and Uddam Singh. On top of that cuz go look it up his son even said his father was like that.

 

Gandhi was a puppet employed by the british his love for white ppl only died when that bullet hit his dome.

Go look it up cuz and remember one thing the perception you have is shaped by the White MSM itz the same thing with MLK. Go ask brothas n sistas who fighting know what they think of him (not gonna go into detail on that cuz it'll cause the thread to drift).

 

There the white perception and white pplz world and then there's ours. The white one is a bubble where even undeniable facts and records will be altered to provide comfort in the lies that shape the course of this world we live in today.

exactly realize that bare mandem not just us muthafuccas on the eastside of that original continet but all the way to the west joined up in ww1 as well 2 just to smuggle bacc choppaz into the country despite all the forced famines on all of us for example just in what you would call india there were over

 

Fucc let my niggas speak http://members.tripod.com/~INDIA_RESOURCE/colonial.html

 

The Colonial Legacy - Myths and Popular Beliefs

While few educated South Asians would deny that British Colonial rule was detrimental to the interests of the common people of the sub-continent - several harbor an illusion that the British weren't all bad. Didn't they, perhaps, educate us - build us modern cities, build us irrigation canals - protect our ancient monuments - etc. etc. And then, there are some who might even say that their record was actually superior to that of independent India's! Perhaps, it is time that the colonial record be retrieved from the archives and re-examined - so that those of us who weren't alive during the freedom movement can learn to distinguish between the myths and the reality."

 

read that whole shit go learn more shit Fucc Gandhi you can claim his ideas were complex and that shit about loving white ppl get outta here str8 up you dont get waht kind of love it was it was a servant to his "beloved" master so getta here. He doesnt love nobody cuz actions speak louder then words.

 

My ideas about him are simple as his. His face under my boot.

 

RBG All day

 

edit- and straight up rarely does a grown man change as much as they claim Gandhi did. If he wasnt ready to pop off when he was in SA and even before that what makes you think he would after? He was encouraging POC to join the british agains the boers because he beleived esp indians owed the british for shipping off to SA. On top of that checc this despite being for "peace" (dont pop massa plz he give me money LOL) he never denounced any war the british were in ww1, ww2, zulus, sikhs, boers, all thru the continent and farther cuz.

 

 

Fucc That Punk ass sellout

 

edit - and Thirusuj honestly the only indian ppl who actually like gandhi are like rich high caste bramins esp from Gujurat cuz thats his state. If a man is a product of his environment see how all the patelz and othe rppl from gujurat act like today on a general tip like the avg person. The same ppl who got some money kicced down to em the small minority in india who makes more then 20rs a day (gov admitted 80-85% made that much think about what the real # is) are the ones who love him cuz they get money off it and they delusional str8 up they my enemy cuz that ignorance and sellout ass fuccery. Just like rich ppl anywhere what do you think they gonna act like?

 

 

Rexdale_Punjabi wrote:

edit - and Thirusuj honestly the [b]only indian ppl who actually like gandhi are like rich high caste bramins esp from Gujurat[/b] cuz thats his state. If a man is a product of his environment see how all the patelz and othe rppl from gujurat act like today on a general tip like the avg person. The same ppl who got some money kicced down to em the small minority in india who makes more then 20rs a day (gov admitted 80-85% made that much think about what the real # is) are the ones who love him cuz they get money off it and [b]they delusional str8 up they my enemy cuz that ignorance and sellout ass fuccery.[/b] Just like rich ppl anywhere what do you think they gonna act like?

first bolded: got something to back up that assertion? I have friends whose family descend from a variety of background in India (and Nepal) and it isn't as though Gandhi is seen as some sort of monster like you seem to see him.

I think you're undermining other people and setting up a false dichotomy of one's actual financial status when regarding their admiration of Gandhi. Again lots and lots and lots of different backgrounds inhabit the subcontinent. However, who are you to say that these people are delusional and ascribe to them these characteristics? Do you have perhaps some articles that PROVE these assertions that people who like Gandhi are delusional because they are ignorant of the facts and engage in sellout assfuccery?

Caissa wrote:

Any chance you could edit this phrase out of #10 Rex Pun?

sellout ass coon.

 

Thanks for removing the offensive phrase from #2.

no

 

Papal Bull Go search it urself Ive posted the articles on this b4 and Im through arguging at length only gonna say this.Papal bull lol do you realize most ppl esp the ones who aint born here will NEVER talk on a real tip to you they'll hide shit all over ppl got this tradition it's like you dont show weakness to outsiders and many would consider you the enemy so you really think they gonna do that?

And also Im not gonna try and explain how shit like religion will end up making a lot of ppl from diverse ancestries think they the same group and act in the same manner.

 

And itz always a vocal minority that causes shit the avg person probably knows who gandhi is maybe thinks he a hero but after that doesnt give a shit they need to put food on the table like everybody else itz why ppl in the hood dont vote for example cuz.

You could also not understand what sellout ass shit is and who am I to put those notions? Well Im that Nigga the one from the rex who schools kids like you when they act up

 

Thirusuj itz funny though because middle class indian just means you got maybe a roof over ur head n if ur luccy a fridge itz poor by hood standards lol and itz only huge in numbers because it a billion people most of the population (gov study btw go wikipedia it even) shows wus craccin few % are getting a throwdown while the rest starving.

 

Inequality is always higher in the 3rd world a weird statistic is that africa has the higher luxury cars per capita... shows wus craccin

Ze wrote:

Rexdale_Punjabi wrote:

Caissa wrote:

Any chance you could edit this phrase out of #10 Rex Pun?

sellout ass coon.

 

Thanks for removing the offensive phrase from #2.

no

You're attached to the word "coon" are ya? 

lol attached? I dont even get attached to pom I just feel itz a accurate description I changed the other one because I felt it wasnt since when the fucc do other ppl run me? Not this lifetime lol

I would see a problem with it, but unless I'm going blind, (the nuns said that could happen) the offending phrase is gone, in which case let's not keep repeating it.

 

ETA: sorry, I'm looking at the wrong post.  Yup it's there all right.  ...get back to you.

You tried to initiate an interesting discussion, thirusuj.

Omnia vincet amor, however.

Michelle wrote:

It's still in post 8 (not post 10). And it's completely inappropriate, and I am removing it.  R_P, that is oppressive language, and you may not use such racist epithets to describe people of colour here.

Also, for those net nannies who are more interested in scouring R_P's posts for infractions than in actually discussing the topic in the threads - how about flagging his posts and leaving it to the moderators to take action, instead of spending half the thread nagging?

Let's get back on topic.

I've discussed parts of the topic that interested me, so I hope "net nannies" isn't referring to me. But Michelle, would you really prefer people to run to the mods rather than point out this sort of language to the person using it? (I'll ask in reactions if you'd rather.)

On topic -- more fascist-style reactions from the BJP government of Gujarat are par for the course, yes? 

Just as a by-the-way: there's a campaign to get UCLA to stop naming one of its South Asia scholarship awards after Patel, who the campaigners call "an apologist for Hindutva." As with so many things, this goes way beyond South Asia.

--

"One law for the lion and the ox is oppression" - Blake