We're not "quick to draw conclusions based on who was involved",
I call post #2 "quick to draw conclusions" - based on one single article, and most of the post dealing with politics and environment and elections - and it went downhill from there.
Interesting that Unionist labels a "potentially dangerous aspect of our human nature" the urge to judge apparent killers, rather than the much better-ingrained and protected urge to blow away inconvenient folks.
I'm talking about [b]us[/b], martin. None of us here on babble has an urge to kill cyclists. Several of us, however, have an urge to prejudge based on who was involved. I'm suggesting that's dangerous.
As for Bryant calling 911, there is a good chance he did that immediately AFTER the "incident."
I have no clue. I was just gently urging sanizadeh to look at all the available material before jumping to conclusions. For all I know, Bryant may have deliberately murdered this person for kicks. I'll wait and see what transpires.