As you can see by the links in my previous posts your rosy picture of happy neighbours is not the case.
You have said elsewhere that you don't want any independent sex worker setting up a private incall location in your neighbourhood, or your building. But are you suggesting it is ok?
Not at all. I am saying that other populations are more important than the ones that are currently working out of their homes and are apparently content in their chosen profession.
Yes, independents can work from a permanent home like location -- but they are breaking the law. Your point emphasizes that these women are criminals, and can be punished and charged for a legal activity that takes place only through illegal means.
The practice of not charging the women is based on the notion that most women are involved due to societal pressures or constraints of one form or another.
Women who don't feel victimized by prostitution get a free pass because of those who are. That doesn't mean the johns should and it doesn't mean that if they are discovered they shouldn't be shut down.
Illegal workers, even when instructed to do something illegal like spread pesticides without proper protective gear, are not charged. The person that has bought their time and told them what to do is prosecuted.
Johns, like the person doing the "buying" above, are the ones that get prosecuted. That doesn't mean that the workers had the "right" to work under the conditions that they did, even if they chose it as a better alternative to whatever else was available to them.