Things look bad, very bad, for the Liberals in Canada's latest polling thread

120 posts / 0 new
Last post
melovesproles

Debater, why would you waste your time defending the Ignasty Liberals on a progressive website?  Totally incompetent and a rightwing piece of shit, the sooner Iggy goes back to Harvard the better for our country and for your party.

NorthReport

Oh my!

 

By-Election Results November 9, 2009

New Westminster-Coquitlam

NDP 49.6%, 1st

Cons - 35.8%, 2nd

Libs - 10.3%, 3rd

 

Cumberland-Colchester-Musquodoboit Valley

Cons - 45.8%%, 1st 

NDP - 25.7%, 2nd

Libs - 21.3%, 3rd

 

Hochelaga

BQ - 51.2%, 1st

NPD - 19.5%, 2nd

Libs - 14.3%, 3rd

Cons - 10.1%

 

Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup

 

Cons - 42.7%

BQ - 37.7%, 2nd

Libs - 13.2%, 3rd

NPD - 4.8%, 4th


NorthReport

McKenna waiting in the wings. He couldn't do worse than Ignatieff could he.

Oops, that's what they were saying about Ignatieff in relation to Dion. 

Most folks think the right-wing Ignatieff should quit, but is another right-winger like McKenna the one to replace him. 

 

McKenna keeps door ajar

http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/front/article/851221

 

 

NorthReport

 

As at 12:46 am on November 10th:

33,608 Canadians voted Tory in these by-elections, which was 35.72 per cent of the total vote cast.

22,783 Canadians voted New Democrat, 24.22 per cent of the total.

19,709 Canadians (perhaps we should say, Quebeckers) voted Bloc, 20.95 per cent of the total.

And 13,914 Canadians voted Liberal, 14.79 per cent of the total.

Ergo, in terms of the absolute national poll, Mr. Harper got in the range of what he had in the 2008 election. Mr. Layton is a solid second, improving nicely. And Mr. Ignatieff led his party to fourth place in terms of total vote, behind the Bloc Québécois.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/brian-topp/middling-gaining-and-falling-flat/article1357394/?cid=art-rail-bureaublog

NorthReport

 

Libs will have to 'remake Ignatieff' to poach NDP's support: pollster
Pollster Nik Nanos says the Liberals should try to appeal to NDP supporters, but it will be politically challenging.

http://www.thehilltimes.ca/page/view/ignatieff_remake-11-9-2009

Debater

NorthReport wrote:

All those terrible rumours are untrue. Ther Liberals actually did beat the Greens. Laughing

New Westminster-Coquitlam By-Election Results Nov 9/09

NDP -  49.6%

Cons - 35.8%

Libs - 10.3%

Grn - 4.3%

What rumours?  Wasthe Green Party expected to do well?  It's certainly not good for Elizabeth May that the Liberals beat her by more than a 2:1 margin in B.C. considering how poorly the Liberals are doing in the province these days.

Scott Piatkowski Scott Piatkowski's picture

It's nice to see that the Liberals are taking solace at having beaten the Green Party.

NorthReport

 

Laughing

Scott Piatkowski wrote:

It's nice to see that the Liberals are taking solace at having beaten the Green Party.

madmax

Quote:
Mr. Donolo said in order for the Liberals to win, the NDP needs to be at 10 per cent support or less.

 
 
 
By-Election Results November 9, 2009
New Westminster-Coquitlam
NDP 49.6%, 1st
Cons - 35.8%, 2nd
Libs - 10.3%, 3rd

canuquetoo

Popular opinion holds that the Cons need the NDP to maintain ~18% support in order to bleed enough Lib votes to ensure a Con majority. With the Liberal meltdown, I wonder if the Con strategy will be different to forestall the NDP gaining Official Opposition status at the expense of the Liberals.

A Con majority with an NDP O.O. will give the socialist viewpoint direct exposure against Conservative policies rather than having them co-opted by both the Libs and Cons. It will be a great opportunity to reach the voter, building trust without the responsibility of governing and a logical steppingstone to winning the next election.

A Conservative victory in the next election may be the NDP's greatest opportunity.

remind remind's picture

Oh my goodness scott splurted coffee all over  when i read that...

 

ineresting breakdown about how many voters voted for whom in total...thanks for posting it NR.

 

surely the Liberals really are not planning on scuttling Iffy, and slapping  McKenna in there are they?

 

the optics of that would be even worse than keeping him

 

 

Debater

melovesproles wrote:

Debater, why would you waste your time defending the Ignasty Liberals on a progressive website?  Totally incompetent and a rightwing piece of shit, the sooner Iggy goes back to Harvard the better for our country and for your party.

I don't like Ignatieff actually - I've never been a fan.  Ignatieff probably does belong back at Harvard.  And the Liberals are not "my party".  I don't have an allegiance to a political party right now since I am still in limbo.  I'm just trying to provide some realism into some of the discussions going on here.

NorthReport

LaughingLaughingLaughing

ottawaobserver

I would be more prepared to give the Liberals a pass on these by-elections, none of which were in natural seats for them, if they had been so charitable to the NDP in the March 2008 by-elections, which were held in some of the wealthiest ridings in the country.  But, no, they couldn't miss a chance to spin and crow about the NDP's performance back then.  So, no quarter given now, not from me.

The issue for the Liberals is not whether they could have been expected to do well so much, but what could they do with the opening.  Test-run their new Liberalist software, train volunteers, test out new messages or strategies ... just a few ideas.  But they seemed completely uninterested or unwilling to do even that.  Big missed opportunity.  And not only according to me.

KenS

I listened to Jim Burrows this morning, the Liberal candidate in CCMV. He wasn't complaining. Nonetheless, a translation of one stream of his remarks on their campaign: they were left to their own devices to "build an organization".

If your party supports you even minimaly, you aren't building an organization during a campaign.

If anyone wants to beat me to it- pull today's Herald cartoon on Iggy and post it here. Its choice.

Sean in Ottawa

Is there a link-- if not can you describe?

ottawaobserver

Sean, you can look today here.  But it's copyrighted and can't be downloaded.  And will probably be replaced tomorrow.

Sean in Ottawa

Thanks and we can still preserve a description -- that's allowed--

In the cartoon Iggy is in the trees saying when he was elected the Liberals were going places. In the last fram he is asking they send a search party.

The artist is Bruce MacKinnon.

Frustrated Mess Frustrated Mess's picture

Lord Palmerston

ottawaobserver wrote:
But, no, they couldn't miss a chance to spin and crow about the NDP's performance back then.

Yeah, I recall them gloating about how the NDP was screwed because they came in fourth in Willowdale!

adma

Though I kind of wonder what might have happened had one of the present byelections been in a "no hope" Ontario seat like Willowdale--or conversely, if the poor Green vs NDP numbers in the present byelections have an affect on national numbers...

ottawaobserver

I think it won't be long before the national pollsters decide that the Green numbers in the polls overstate their actual vote, and conclude that prompting with the Green Party name is skewing those results.  I think the national media has already concluded that the Greens' moment has passed and have just stopped covering them.

remind remind's picture

why?

ocsi

That's such a wonderful cartoon!  "When I became Liberal leader we were going places.  Please send a search party."  In my younger days I would have said it was great agitprop.  Today I just can't stop laughing.  I hope the cartoonist doesn't get into trouble.

ottawaobserver

remind wrote:

why?

I think because the Greens never meet those poll numbers in elections, because Elizabeth May's media relations have been unprofessional, and because she's now running in her third riding and they don't believe she can win that one either, she seems to have lost credibility, and they've decided that the rejection of the Green Shift also constituted a rejection of the Green Party's platform.

jimmyjim

Ken, Jim is spinning you about the organization thing. I know this because I am in NS in one of the few Liberal provincial riddings and there wasn;t a constituency worker to be found the first two weeks of the campaign in this ridding. They were all up in Turo working for Jim, Iggy came down twice. What happen was they saw they were going to lose and as soon the leader cut and ran the rest of them did too. Meaning Jim had to build a team the last two weeks because all of his support left a sinking ship scared they would be linked to a big loss. It was sad in a way.

remind remind's picture

 most certainly OO, I can agree with all that, and quite the fete really...she destroyed 2 parties in one go..... ;)

 

 

David Young

Frustrated Mess wrote:

Bruce MacKinnon has to be the best cartoonist when it comes to describing a particular moment in time.

If we could all pass this classic piece of commentary onto as many Canadians as possible, maybe then they would start waking up and realize just how lost Iggy really is!

 

KenS

jimmyjim wrote:
Ken, Jim is spinning you about the organization thing. I know this because I am in NS in one of the few Liberal provincial riddings and there wasn;t a constituency worker to be found the first two weeks of the campaign in this ridding. They were all up in Turo working for Jim, Iggy came down twice. What happen was they saw they were going to lose and as soon the leader cut and ran the rest of them did too. Meaning Jim had to build a team the last two weeks because all of his support left a sinking ship scared they would be linked to a big loss. It was sad in a way.

Sprinkling in a couple workers on the NSLP's dime does not count as supporting a campaign- even if they had been in Burrows campaign the whole time. [Not to mention that there is only one in your consituency, and being away more than a week would get her or him in hot water.] And the Leader would show up a couple times even if they never planned to really support the campaign- he just has to, not to mention making sure they don't put in a disastrously embarrasing showing.

And I knew from early in the campaign there was no support there- just a good showing considering by a brave group of folks who weren't going anywhere.

ottawaobserver

The new EKOS is out late tonight (PDF).  The headline numbers are:

National federal vote intention:
¤ 36.6% CPC
¤ 26.6% LPC
¤ 16.8% NDP
¤ 11.2% Green
¤ 8.8% BQ

Decided voters; most recent data point Nov. 4-10 (n=2885); undecided rate of 16.6%

I think we have reached the conclusion that those Green Party numbers are inflated based on prompting by the polling firms.  Which probably makes this a bit closer of a 3-way race that it looks.  Right now there's a 10-pt gap between first and second, and between second and third.

The Quebec numbers are:
¤ 35.6% BQ
¤ 21.7% CPC
¤ 21.3% LPC
¤ 10.7% NDP
¤ 10.6% Green

Again, when the rubber hits the road, no way those Green numbers stand up.

NorthReport

 

Interesting commentary from the pollster.

 

Although the Liberals might like to think that the H1N1 pandemic will turn into Stephen Harper’s “hurricane Katrina,” as a recent email from the party’s president put it, there is no sign that this is happening, and even less sign that the issue is benefitting the Liberals.

The Conservatives have edged down somewhat from their October peak, in the aftermath of Liberal election threats, but they are still about where they were in the 2008 election. The Liberals, meanwhile, after having enjoyed a relatively stronger spring and summer, are back down where they were in the 2008 election – their worst-ever in history.

“The parties now appear to be fairly ‘locked in’ to support levels consistent with the last election. There does not appear to be anything in the handling of the H1N1 crisis which is like to disrupt that pattern. What must be most worrisome for the Liberals is that while the Conservatives have slipped somewhat in the last month, none of that shift has accrued to them,” said Graves. “If anyone has been the beneficiary, it may be the NDP, which has recovered somewhat from the political crisis of the early fall, and is now back near the top of its normal range.”

 

NorthReport

H1N1 FEARS “EXAGGERATED” SAY MANY CANADIANS

http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full-report-november-12.pdf
Canada

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP / Bloc

2008 Election / 37.7% / 26.2% / 18.2% / 10% / Cons surpassed Libs by 12% 

Nov 11 / EKOS / 36.6% / 26.6% / 16.8% / Cons lead Libs by 10%

Nov 5 / EKOS / 37.4% / 26.8% / 16.3% 

Oct 29 / ARS / 40% / 26% / 17%  

Oct 28 / EKOS / 38.4% / 26.8% / 16.7%  

Oct 26 / Envir / 38% / 26% / 16%  

Oct 26 / IR / 40% / 25% / 13% 

Oct 22 / Nanos / 39.8% / 30% / 16.6% 

Oct 22 / EKOS / 38.3% / 27.1% / 14.5% 

Oct 16 / ARS / 41% / 27% / 16% 

Oct 15 / EKOS / 40.7% / 25.5% / 14.3% 

Oct 15 / HD / 35% / 28% / 15% 

Oct 12 / IR / 39% /29%/ 13% 

Oct 8 / EKOS / 39.7% / 25.7%  / 15.2% 

Oct 6 / Strat Con / 41% / 28% / 14%

BC

Date / Pollster / Cons / NDP / Libs

2008 / Election / 44.5% / 26.1% / 19.3%    

Oct 29 / ARS / 43% / 25% / 27%

Oct 28 / EKOS / 36.8% / 28.9%  / 25%

Oct 26 / Envir / 34% / 29% / 24% 

Oct 26 / IR / 49% / 23% / 18%  

Oct 22 / Nanos / 37.3% / 22.6% / 29.4%  

Oct 22 / EKOS / 37.5% / 24.9% / 25.4%  

Oct 16 / AR / 47% / 22% / 21% / 9%  

Sask/Man

Date / Pollster / Cons / NDP / Libs

Nov 11 / EKOS / 44.2% / 28.8% / 16.3%

Ontario

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP

2008 Election / 39.2% / 33.8% / 18.2%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 39.2% / 33.8% / 15.5%

Oct 29 / ARS / 41% / 31% / 17%

Oct 15 / ARS / 45% / 29% / 19%

Quebec 

Date / Pollster / Bloc / Libs / Cons / NDP

2008 Election / 38.1% / 23.8% / 21.7% / 12.2%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 35.6% / 21.3% / 21.7% / 10.7%

Oct 29 / ARS / 40% / 20% / 21% / 15% 

Oct 28 / CROP / 37% / 23% / ? / 16%

Oct 15 / ARS / 36% / 26% / 25% / 8%

AC

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP

2008 Election / 

Nov 11 / EKOS / 36.5% / 32.8% / 25.3%

Oct 29 / ARS / 35% / 32% / 26%

Leadership

Best PM

Quebec

Date / Pollster / Lay / Har/ Ign

Oct 28 / CROP / 26% / 25% / 20% / Layton leads

 

 

NorthReport

The amount of bad news that is hitting the airwaves each day now for the Liberals is unlike anything I have ever seen before I began following politics. It's actually quite staggering with even right-wing Liberals like McKenna, by-the-way is he their next saviour, saying they will not be forming the government any time soon. Read: the Liberals are in major meltdown and Harper is mopping the floor with them.

NorthReport

Maybe we’ll have have an election in… 2011

Harper acts as if he’ll be around for a while; the Liberals hope the hard choices ahead will grind him down

“I don’t think 2011 should be out of the question,” a Liberal MP told me, leaning in conspiratorially.

For what? A summer full of sunshine? A return to three-button jackets? “For an election,” the MP said.

This guy’s thinking, which I’ve since learned is shared by at least a few other veteran Liberals in Ottawa, is as follows. The polls don’t favour Michael Ignatieff right now, and haven’t since he announced in September he would work to bring down the Harper government at the first chance. Indeed the polls have been so stinkeroo for the Liberals that Ignatieff has had to un-announce his September announcement. Now he’s in no hurry to replace the Harper government. Some Liberals suspect Ignatieff replaced his inexperienced, poorly connected chief of staff, Ian Davey, with the wily Chrétien-era fixer Peter Donolo because Davey didn’t foresee the popular backlash against Ignatieff’s “Mr. Harper, your time is up” announcement.

Well then. If there’s no election this autumn, will there be one in the spring? Perhaps not: the Vancouver/Whistler Olympics are in February, and for some reason an ironclad conventional wisdom has sprung up that elections must not be held near an Olympics. A federal budget will soon follow the Olympics. A budget gives the Harper Conservatives a chance to spend some $230 billion. It’s not easy to make enemies while spending $230 billion. Suddenly it’s summer, when we mustn’t have an election, followed by autumn when we mustn’t have an election, I forget why not. This is what we do in Ottawa these days: stare at the calendar, shaking our heads.

Anyway, by late 2010, the recession will be well and truly over, and (my Liberal interlocutor reasoned) there’ll be no more of this stimulus spending. Instead, the government, whoever forms it, will be belt-tightening to get out of deficits. Since belt-tightening is never pleasant or popular, Liberals are thinking it might as well be Harper who is stuck with doing it. Give the nasty work a little time to grind Harper down, and suddenly it’s 2011.

Let’s go with this theory a bit and see where it leads us. For one thing, Harper would by 2011 have passed Alexander Mackenzie, Lester Pearson and—aim high—maybe even R.B. Bennett in longevity, which would make him Canada’s 10th longest-serving prime minister. (He’d need almost another year after that to catch up to John Diefenbaker.) What’s perhaps more significant is that the very atmosphere in the capital would change, and not too soon either. Instead of careening from one crisis of parliamentary confidence to the next, the government and its opponents might finally have the luxury to take the longish view. This could come in handy for all of them. Whether in government or opposition, they all have work they’ve been postponing because they weren’t sure they’d have the time to do it.

All of this seems already to have occurred to Harper. Lately he’s started taking steps that assume he’ll be around for a while. His trips to India and China. His Supreme Court reference on Ottawa’s right to establish a national securities regulator. His judicial inquiry into the collapse of the Pacific salmon fishery. The latter two, especially, will take more than a year to play out. Harper appears to be betting he’ll still be Prime Minister when the time comes to act on their conclusions. It’s been so long since we had a government that thought about the long term that the very prospect is bracing and a bit disorienting. But good for him; even if he’s wrong in his calculations, Harper is beginning work that will serve his successor well.

Michael Ignatieff, meanwhile, gets to do the work that will improve his chances of being Harper’s successor. He, too, has already begun. He made do for nearly a year with temporary help to run the Office of the Leader of the Opposition. Now Donolo can give the place structure and order, really for the first time since 2006. Next comes a “thinkers’ conference” Ignatieff promised when he thought he’d have to fight Bob Rae for the Liberal leadership and probably now heartily regrets promising. It was to happen in September and is now scheduled for early 2010. Ignatieff’s minimal need is to impose a Hippocratic oath on this thing: first, it must do no harm to his leadership. So it mustn’t degenerate into a forum for clannish infighting or a source of quotes for future Conservative attack ads. If it actually produces any ideas that’s a sort of bonus.

One other party must adjust to the yawning chasm of non-crisis that lies ahead. Jack Layton’s NDP doesn’t get much attention around Ottawa these days, but viewed properly, that’s a problem. Layton decided in January he would do the opposite of whatever Ignatieff did. When Ignatieff was desperate to avoid an election, Layton was voting non-confidence at every turn and mocking Ignatieff’s timidity. When Ignatieff reversed polarity in September, so did Layton. Suddenly he was the Only Man Who Wanted Parliament To Work. If Ignatieff’s moves have been dumb, Layton’s must be clever. And yet, in poll after poll, the New Democrats can’t get off the floor. I think Layton has been a good leader for the NDP, but there seems to be a ceiling to his appeal. Now that the party has time to replace him, he must ask himself whether to get that process started by handing in his resignation

http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/13/maybe-well-have-have-an-election-in-2011/

Ignatieff slips closer to Dion territory

The good news for Michael Ignatieff in a new Nanos Research poll is that he is still more popular than was his predecessor, Stéphane Dion, after he lost the last general election just over a year ago. 

The bad news is that another month like the one just passed and the Liberal leader will be in Dion territory — that is, where only one in 10 Canadians think you would make the best Prime Minister. 

The latest poll shows that Mr. Ignatieff's popularity has fallen off a cliff since the summer. When he became leader, he was within touching distance of Stephen Harper, with the percentage of people thinking he would make the best prime minister consistently in the high 20s, compared to Mr. Harper's numbers in the low 30s.

----------------

There is great concern in Conservative ranks that any gains in central Canada at the next election could be wiped out if the party lost some of its 22 seats in B.C. to the NDP over the harmonized sales tax issue. For this reason, if no other, one suspects the government will be keen to avoid a general election around the time the HST is introduced in B.C. and in Ontario next summer.
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/13/john-ivison-ignatieff-slips-closer-to-dion-territory.aspx

 

Canada

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP / Bloc

2008 Election / 37.7% / 26.2% / 18.2% / 10% / Cons surpassed Libs by 12% 

Nov 13 / Nanos / 38% / 28.8% / 17.9% / Libs lead NDP by 11%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 36.6% / 26.6% / 16.8% / 

Nov 5 / EKOS / 37.4% / 26.8% / 16.3% 

Oct 29 / ARS / 40% / 26% / 17%  

Oct 28 / EKOS / 38.4% / 26.8% / 16.7%  

Oct 26 / Envir / 38% / 26% / 16%  

Oct 26 / IR / 40% / 25% / 13% 

Oct 22 / Nanos / 39.8% / 30% / 16.6% 

Oct 22 / EKOS / 38.3% / 27.1% / 14.5% 

Oct 16 / ARS / 41% / 27% / 16% 

Oct 15 / EKOS / 40.7% / 25.5% / 14.3% 

Oct 15 / HD / 35% / 28% / 15% 

Oct 12 / IR / 39% /29%/ 13% 

Oct 8 / EKOS / 39.7% / 25.7%  / 15.2% 

Oct 6 / Strat Con / 41% / 28% / 14%

BC

Date / Pollster / Cons / NDP / Libs

2008 / Election / 44.5% / 26.1% / 19.3%    

Oct 29 / ARS / 43% / 25% / 27%

Oct 28 / EKOS / 36.8% / 28.9%  / 25%

Oct 26 / Envir / 34% / 29% / 24% 

Oct 26 / IR / 49% / 23% / 18%  

Oct 22 / Nanos / 37.3% / 22.6% / 29.4%  

Oct 22 / EKOS / 37.5% / 24.9% / 25.4%  

Oct 16 / AR / 47% / 22% / 21% / 9%  

Sask/Man

Date / Pollster / Cons / NDP / Libs

Nov 11 / EKOS / 44.2% / 28.8% / 16.3%

Ontario

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP

2008 Election / 39.2% / 33.8% / 18.2%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 39.2% / 33.8% / 15.5%

Oct 29 / ARS / 41% / 31% / 17%

Oct 15 / ARS / 45% / 29% / 19%

Quebec 

Date / Pollster / Bloc / Libs / Cons / NDP

2008 Election / 38.1% / 23.8% / 21.7% / 12.2%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 35.6% / 21.3% / 21.7% / 10.7%

Oct 29 / ARS / 40% / 20% / 21% / 15% 

Oct 28 / CROP / 37% / 23% / ? / 16%

Oct 15 / ARS / 36% / 26% / 25% / 8%

AC

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP

2008 Election / 

Nov 11 / EKOS / 36.5% / 32.8% / 25.3%

Oct 29 / ARS / 35% / 32% / 26%

Leadership

Best PM

Quebec

Date / Pollster / Lay / Har/ Ign

Oct 28 / CROP / 26% / 25% / 20% / Layton leads

 

 

]

no1important

I think it is too late for Iggy though, the damage has been done. I do not think he can recover. I really don't.

I guess we will have to wait until after the next election for a new Lib leader? or will Iggy do the right thing and step down beforehand? I really do not believe he can win.

Harper is only 8 seats from majority territory (although he really has a defacto one now) and can have a Senate majority by Christmas, so things are going to start getting better/easier for Harper and I fully believe he will get a majority next time, not because he is good but because Iggy is so bad (he may not be that bad but the damage to his reputation is done as far too many think he is and people will not give any other party a chance so we will have harper for 4-5 more years depending on next election).

Iggy should hire some of the same PR people and spin doctors like what the cons have. I hate Harper but he runs a lean mean well oiled machine almost like the now rusted out Big Red Machine the Libs had at one time.

Hard to believe almost a year ago Harper even being conservative-reform party leader was in doubt as was his conservative-reform party government.

Harper really should be kissing Iggy's ass in gratitude. Iggy saved Harpers political life and the con-reform government and now almost a year later the Libs are down the drain and Harper oh so close to a majority, probably within a year. Unbelievable really.

I also wonder if Iggy secretly regrets not going the coalition route? But you know what they say about hindsight..

madmax

Ignatieff has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

NorthReport

What, no EKOS polling results, apart from the gun control bullshit, for this week.

Polling must be either very good for the NDP, or very bad for the Liberals, or maybe both, for Graves to have not published his results this week. Wink

Debater

NorthReport wrote:

What, no EKOS polling results, apart from the gun control bullshit, for this week.

Polling must be either very good for the NDP, or very bad for the Liberals, or maybe both, for Graves to have not published his results this week. Wink

Not necessarily.  And the polls are likely to show a small uptick for the Liberals rather than a decline.  The Conservatives are likely to experience a small decline.

Yes, Graves was on Evan Solomon's Politics show today talking about a poll -  a poll on Canadians' attitude towards gun control and the gun registry.  Canadians appear divided on the subject.

ottawaobserver

They've changed the EKOS schedule.  A bigger sample, but only every other week now; with viewer questions in the off-weeks.  ThreeHundredEight.com inferred what the party standings would be from one of the break-out cross-tabs on one of the gun questions, but thinks those are unweighted numbers.

NorthReport

Yup, you sure called it Debater. Laughing

 

The reality is EKOS saw the good NDP numbers, and the cave-in for the Liberal numbers and didn't want to publish. 

 

Debater wrote:

NorthReport wrote:

What, no EKOS polling results, apart from the gun control bullshit, for this week.

Polling must be either very good for the NDP, or very bad for the Liberals, or maybe both, for Graves to have not published his results this week. Wink

Not necessarily.  And the polls are likely to show a small uptick for the Liberals rather than a decline.  The Conservatives are likely to experience a small decline.

Yes, Graves was on Evan Solomon's Politics show today talking about a poll -  a poll on Canadians' attitude towards gun control and the gun registry.  Canadians appear divided on the subject.

West Coast Lefty

Debater wrote:

Not necessarily.  And the polls are likely to show a small uptick for the Liberals rather than a decline.  The Conservatives are likely to experience a small decline.

Sorry Debater - more like "continued collapse for the Liberals to the lowest standings in polling history, only 5 or so points ahead of the NDP."  What's your prediction for next week? I'm sure Donolo's "Iggy Invisible" strategy of having the Leader of the Opposition absent from Parliament for a major international scandal involving war crimes committed by Canadian soildiers will be a smashing success Laughing If Iggy doesn't want the Opposition Leader's job, Jack will be happy to take over from him...

NorthReport

Federal NDP making gains at Liberal, Tory expense: Poll

 

The federal New Democratic Party has vaulted to levels of voter approval not seen since before the last federal election, as Canada's two major parties struggle to hold support, suggest findings of a poll released Friday.

 

The NDP surged six percentage points to 19 per cent support nationally, according to results of an Ipsos Reid poll, commissioned by Canwest News Service and Global National.

 

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's ruling Conservatives fell three points to 37 per cent, shy of the 40 per cent typically seen as a level needed to land a majority government.

 

Michael Ignatieff's Liberals garnered 24 per cent of support among respondents, a drop of one percentage point from late October.

 

The Liberals' steady descent has them almost at the same depths as in December of last year, when former leader Stephane Dion's call for a coalition government sat uneasily with a majority of Canadians. A poll taken Dec. 3 suggested the Liberals' support had dipped to 23 per cent.

 

The results suggest Liberal attacks during the last month — such as those over stimulus spending, partisan appointments, and reports that Afghan detainees under Canadian supervision had been handed over to local authorities where they were later tortured — have had little traction with voters.

 

Darrell Bricker, CEO and president of Ipsos Reid, chalked up the gains of Jack Layton's NDP to Ontario voters being frustrated with the McGuinty government, particularly with the forthcoming harmonized sales tax, and that is being carried over to the federal Liberals.

 

"The NDP has really started to define a position on that issue," said Bricker. "It's not that the NDP has moved so much provincially, but the Liberal brand is in a certain amount of trouble in this province. As we know, (Ontario) is a place where elections are won and lost."

 

In Ontario, 39 per cent of decided voters said if an election were held today, they would cast their ballots for the Conservatives (down two points since October); the Liberals would attract 29 per cent support (down three points); the NDP 21 per cent, up eight points; and the Greens eight per cent, down six points.

 

"It looks like the Liberals are caught in that old classic pincer movement," said Bricker, "where they're now not just losing their centrist and slightly right-wing voters, they're also starting to lose their left-wing voters . . . to the NDP."

http://www.canada.com/news/Federal+making+gains+Liberal+Tory+expense+Poll/2247668/story.html

 

Canada

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP / Bloc

2008 Election / 37.7% / 26.2% / 18.2% / 10% / Cons surpassed Libs by 12%

Nov 20 / Ipsos / 37% / 24% / 19% / Cons lead Libs by 13% & NDP reduces Libs lead to 5% 

Nov 20 / ARS / 38% / 23% / 17% / Cons lead Libs by 15% & NDP reduces Lib lead to 6% 

Nov 13 / Nanos / 38% / 28.8% / 17.9% / Cons lead Libs by 9% & Libs lead NDP by 11%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 36.6% / 26.6% / 16.8% / 

Nov 5 / EKOS / 37.4% / 26.8% / 16.3% 

Oct 29 / ARS / 40% / 26% / 17%  

Oct 28 / EKOS / 38.4% / 26.8% / 16.7%  

Oct 26 / Envir / 38% / 26% / 16%  

Oct 26 / IR / 40% / 25% / 13% 

Oct 22 / Nanos / 39.8% / 30% / 16.6% 

Oct 22 / EKOS / 38.3% / 27.1% / 14.5% 

Oct 16 / ARS / 41% / 27% / 16% 

Oct 15 / EKOS / 40.7% / 25.5% / 14.3% 

Oct 15 / HD / 35% / 28% / 15% 

Oct 12 / IR / 39% /29%/ 13% 

Oct 8 / EKOS / 39.7% / 25.7%  / 15.2% 

Oct 6 / Strat Con / 41% / 28% / 14%

BC

Date / Pollster / Cons / NDP / Libs

2008 / Election / 44.5% / 26.1% / 19.3%    

Oct 29 / ARS / 43% / 25% / 27%

Oct 28 / EKOS / 36.8% / 28.9%  / 25%

Oct 26 / Envir / 34% / 29% / 24% 

Oct 26 / IR / 49% / 23% / 18%  

Oct 22 / Nanos / 37.3% / 22.6% / 29.4%  

Oct 22 / EKOS / 37.5% / 24.9% / 25.4%  

Oct 16 / AR / 47% / 22% / 21% / 9%  

Sask/Man

Date / Pollster / Cons / NDP / Libs

Nov 11 / EKOS / 44.2% / 28.8% / 16.3%

Ontario

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP

2008 Election / 39.2% / 33.8% / 18.2%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 39.2% / 33.8% / 15.5%

Oct 29 / ARS / 41% / 31% / 17%

Oct 15 / ARS / 45% / 29% / 19%

Quebec 

Date / Pollster / Bloc / Libs / Cons / NDP

2008 Election / 38.1% / 23.8% / 21.7% / 12.2%

Nov 11 / EKOS / 35.6% / 21.3% / 21.7% / 10.7%

Oct 29 / ARS / 40% / 20% / 21% / 15% 

Oct 28 / CROP / 37% / 23% / ? / 16%

Oct 15 / ARS / 36% / 26% / 25% / 8%

AC

Date / Pollster / Cons / Libs / NDP

2008 Election / 

Nov 11 / EKOS / 36.5% / 32.8% / 25.3%

Oct 29 / ARS / 35% / 32% / 26%

Leadership

Best PM

Quebec

Date / Pollster / Lay / Har/ Ign

Oct 28 / CROP / 26% / 25% / 20% / Layton leads

 

 

 

NorthReport

Now is the time for the NDP to seriously put the boots to those lying Liberals. 

NorthReport

Ignatieff slips further behind in poll

 

Michael Ignatieff is surely hoping this is rock bottom.

A new public opinion survey shows support for the Liberals has slipped to 23 per cent – well back of the 38 per cent support for the front-running Conservatives.

The survey was taken from Nov. 14 to Nov. 16, which is before news broke this week regarding the treatment of Afghan detainees.

It shows the Conservatives are essentially at the same level of support, 37.6 per cent, they received in the 2008 election, while the Liberals under Mr. Ignatieff are now three points lower than the 26.2 per cent the party received in 2008 under previous leader Stéphane Dion.

Support for the NDP has remained constant at 17 per cent this fall, which is one point below the party’s 2008 results.

The Angus Reid/Toronto Star survey polled 1,005 Canadian adults who are part of an Angus Reid Forum online panel. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

In contrast to the same survey company’s results for Oct. 23-24, the Tories are down two points, the Liberals are down three points,

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/ignatieff-slips-further-behind-in-poll/article1371546/

NorthReport

Take a good look at these charts.  Smile

Steady as she goes

 

 

 

The NDP is holding on to its roughly 12 per cent support in Quebec, and is nicely competitive in the Atlantic.

If Layton continues to break away from the faltering B.C. Liberals, he would be able give the Conservatives a run for their money in many parts of that province. In Ontario, those numbers suggest that current Conservative and NDP Ontario MPs can be relatively confident of re-election, while Liberal MPs in marginal ridings would be in some trouble. The Quebec numbers are good news for the Bloc Quebecois unless the national parties concentrate and grow their support. At those levels, the Liberal vote in concentrated in anglophone ridings and isn’t going to change the electoral map. The NDP vote is likely strongest on the Island of Montreal and in the Outaouais – not a bad start. The Conservatives, as they demonstrated in last week’s by-elections, seem to be growing in rural Quebec. But the Bloc needs to drop a fair bit, in the right places and distributed the right way, for that party to be seriously dentable. In Atlantic Canada these numbers set up a series of unpredictable three-way races.

What does it all mean? Probably, that the current Parliament would be re-elected in roughly its present form if there was an election today. The Conservatives and New Democrats have done well this fall. But nobody is running away with the show.

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/brian-topp/steady-as-she-goes/article1371750/

NorthReport

Paul Wells and the rest of the Ottawa punditry sure missed this NDP surge, or did they.

Did the earth move boysTongue out

 

Like who cares what the Liberals hope for? Whatever it is, the Canadian voters aren't buying it.

NorthReport

Poor Liberal CBCers. Still drowning their sorrows in the fall from grace of Canada's natural governing party. I don't think they will ever get over it. It seems like the world has passed them by.

With the polls that came out today showing the NDP surging, you can't get a more negative article than this trash.

Opportunity knocks for the NDP?

 

http://www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2009/11/opportunity-knocks-for-the-ndp.html

bekayne

NorthReport wrote:

With the polls that came out today showing the NDP surging

What was the other one besides Ipsos?

bekayne

NorthReport wrote:

 

The reality is EKOS saw the good NDP numbers, and the cave-in for the Liberal numbers and didn't want to publish. 

 

Here's the numbers a blogger extracts from the EKOS gun control poll:

http://threehundredeight.blogspot.com/2009/11/gun-control-poll-from-ekos.html

But looking behind the numbers, we get an idea of party support between November 11 and November 17. EKOS asked respondents who they would vote for in addition to how they felt about guns in order to get an idea of how particular party supporters feel about gun ownership and the long gun registry. Using those numbers from a pool of 2,517 decided voters, we get:

Conservatives - 38.1%
Liberals - 26.6%
New Democrats - 14.5%
Greens - 10.6%
Bloc Quebecois - 10.3%

Now, take those numbers with a grain of salt, as I don't believe EKOS weighted the regional results the same they do for a normal national poll.

NorthReport

This Parliament will last for a while

 

The NDP already negotiating terms for propping up the Conservatives

 

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/This+Parliament+will+last+while/2249954/story.html

Pages