Base Commander of CFB Trenton charged with murdering two women, raping two others

107 posts / 0 new
Last post
Angella

Having been through basic training (twice - once in the ranks and once as an officer), I think it's even more subtle than that, Michelle.  That's why it's so hard to see when you're still in the middle of it.  Take a step back, and it jumps out at you (or at least it did for me).

Snert Snert's picture

Interestingly, if you google "serial killer profession", the two professions that jump out (and for which some evidence is provided as to frequency) are the medial profession, and truck drivers.

kropotkin1951

Michelle wrote:

Take your garden-variety sexist jerk who thinks women are inferior.  I know a few guys like that who have never laid a hands on a woman.  Now, put sexist jerk guy into a uniform, put him through basic training where he's told that any show of weakness is female and despicable, and that the military is always right, and that he is part of that military that is always right.  Surround him with messages that violence is good, killing people they tell you to hate and see as your enemy (and don't forget - weakness and being a pussy or a "girl" is hateful) is a good thing, and what do you get?

I also think that this personality type is specifically recruited by the military especially for their Officer corp. If you don't absolutely believe in the hierarchical model then you can never be a good officer.

Then after you've trained this misogynist you tell him he is a defender of women and children and anyone who questions the military is a supporter of the Taliban attack on women.  I think the effect is compounded by this training to kill and the believe that they are righteous killers.

___________________________________________

Soothsayers had a better record of prediction than economists

Slumberjack

The culture of the military, which dehumanizes the individual into unquestioned subservience, systemically cultivates and magnifies what already exists in the broader society. When military officials speak of looking after people within the organization, which they often do when questions of how individuals are treated internally surface, what they really mean is the priority of ensuring compliance and discipline among the ranks, and the importance of ensuring all policies affecting personnel are devised to ensure that the best interests of the system are paramount. It is an overwhelming patriarchal structure, one where an individual has no opinion that could be offered without asking permission first, where only thoughts that relay how wonderfully effective everything is are allowed to be voiced. A typically abusive personal relationship is but a microcosm of what exists on a much larger scale within such an institution. Some individuals naturally gravitate towards it as best representing their beliefs, and excel while doing so, others discover the reality afterward and either leave or continue to exist, while others attempt to subvert the harmful effects upon individuals.

PraetorianFour

Michelle wrote:

That could be.  Either way, the point stands, that the military is a breeding ground for violence against women.

I'm trying to decide if I agree with this or not.  There is a big "don't be such a girl" culture that's common enough.  I remember once tiltingmy head when I over heard a female coworker of mine telling a guy to stop crying like a girl.

Michelle do you think the military is more of a breeding ground for violence against woman than say rap music or video games like grand Theft Auto where you pay sex workers then either rob or kill them after?  There is a big distinction in the "group behavior" of different groups in the military from the grunts to officers and from combat soldiers and support soldiers.

It's interesting what Snert pointed out regarding Truckers and people in the medical profession.

remind remind's picture

Angella wrote:
Having been through basic training (twice - once in the ranks and once as an officer), I think it's even more subtle than that, Michelle.  That's why it's so hard to see when you're still in the middle of it.  Take a step back, and it jumps out at you (or at least it did for me).

 

Agree with this notation, but IMV, it also becomes more blatent once your in the middle of it, and desensitized.

 

 

ETA:  Good words Slumberjack.....

PraetorianFour

oops

remind remind's picture

Maysie wrote:
well, remind, i need to be honest. This is a hot button topic for me, so my rhetoric may be a tad over the top. And I do NOT have faith in the police system. 

But I know that when charges like this are compiled against a white man who is, shall we say, in a significant position of authority, in a profession that is regarded as very high on the "good man doing good work" scale (mainstream standards of course), then it takes a lot to bring charges in the first place.

And yes, of course he's innocent until bla bla. But he's a white guy. He'll be fine. The police and the "justice" system do far worse to far more people who have done nothing or very little. With no media attention.

 

Great honesty maysie! ;)

 

Oh now I remember what I had been going to say before I got distracted.....

 

I love over-the-top rhetoric, in today's world of careful speech it soothes the soul.......

remind remind's picture

Quote:
It's interesting what Snert pointed out regarding Truckers and people in the medical profession.

 

Why is it interesting?

 

It is not even factual, did you do a google/search engine search for "serial killers" yourself regarding his claims?

 

I did.

 

 

Bacchus

Hmm so did I. And the articles did point out a prevalence of medical professions "Some people with a pathological interest in the power of life and death tend to be attracted to medical professions."

(Wikipedia).

 

But they left out truck drivers.

PraetorianFour

remind wrote:

Quote:
It's interesting what Snert pointed out regarding Truckers and people in the medical profession.

 

Why is it interesting?

 

It is not even factual, did you do a google/search engine search for "serial killers" yourself regarding his claims?

 

I did.

 

 

 

I just thought it was interesting, not really sure why? Never expected people in the medical profession to be identified as major offenders.

When you googled it what top 3 did you find Remind?

Stargazer

PraetorianFour wrote:

Michelle wrote:

That could be.  Either way, the point stands, that the military is a breeding ground for violence against women.

I'm trying to decide if I agree with this or not.  There is a big "don't be such a girl" culture that's common enough.  I remember once tiltingmy head when I over heard a female coworker of mine telling a guy to stop crying like a girl.

Michelle do you think the military is more of a breeding ground for violence against woman than say rap music or video games like grand Theft Auto where you pay sex workers then either rob or kill them after?  There is a big distinction in the "group behavior" of different groups in the military from the grunts to officers and from combat soldiers and support soldiers.

It's interesting what Snert pointed out regarding Truckers and people in the medical profession.

 

Listening to rap music and/or playing video games only takes up a small percentage of our lives. Being in the military is a full time occupation "we are working hard to chip away all individuality and humanity". Big difference.

paiger

did anyone else watch the press conference yesterday on the cbc with the guy's commander? He was asked outright if the accused had every had a psych evaluation and he said that it was not common and that he had not been tested.

Not that psych evaulations are perfect and infalliable, but doesn't this ring an alarm bell for anyone else? I mean really? Not only are these men (used men purposely here as they are the main leaders) in positions of tremendous power, but they are also engaged in what has been described in this thread as macho culture... shouldn't someone be paying attention to attitudes. If not, does that mean the military simply doesn't give a shit about what these men (and some women too i think) are actually getting out of the experience and how it plays a role in their own lives?

On the issue of past or possible other crimes, I don't think we'd hear about the ones committed anywhere outside of Canada, rape, murder and general mistreatment of women is too common a theme on the part of the military outside of our gloriously benevolent state...

kropotkin1951

I think that the militaries Bomb Villages on the Other Side of the World video game is the  worst of all worlds.  The bad news is that the military understands that making their weapons systems similar to video games gives them a large pool of people to draw on who are already acclimatized to murdering on screen.  Sitting in Arizona and bombing a wedding party in Pakistan is just like playing Grand Theft Auto.  I wonder what new version they will be playing next week.  Many people are betting on Iran as the next edition but Yemen is clearly in the running.  

Maysie Maysie's picture

Thanks for post #55 Slumberjack.

PraetorianFour

Stargazer wrote:

Listening to rap music and/or playing video games only takes up a small percentage of our lives.

I disagree Stargazer. Kids, teenagers and adults today can spend a lot of time on video games. It's common for kids to get home from school hop on the Xbox etc.. and stay on their until bed time. World of Warcraft, Everquest [So addictive it picked up the name crack-quest]. It may be a small part of your world but I'd say a lot of people "live eat and breath" video games. I also find some use stuff like rap music [or any kind of music] to identify who they are.

kropotkin1951 wrote:

I think that the militaries bomb Villages on the Other Side of the World video game is the worst of all worlds. The bad news is that the military understands that making their weapons systems similar to video games gives them a large pool of people to draw on who are already acclimatized to murdering on screen.  Sitting in Arizona and bombing a wedding party in Pakistan is just like playing Grand Theft Auto.  I wonder what new version they will be playing next week.  Many people are betting on Iran as the next edition but Yemen is clearly in the running.

I've read a book that went on to point out how some kids going on shooting rampages at schools [never touching a firearm before] have better accuracy than police officers and the author believed it was from first-person shooter games.

The video game I'm playing currently had a very disturbing scene. You're an undercover soldier who infultrates a Russian gang. You and the russian gang casually stroll through a russian airport graphically murdering unarmed men and women. You don't have to shoot anyone, you can pass the level without following a shot but I've read that all of the gamers during the testing of the game shot into the crowd. Both my wife and I found it disturbing. Called No russian.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Call_of_Duty:_Mod...

Video games are getting scarry.

Tommy_Paine

 

There's really not enough facts for all this, yet.  

 

The Toronto Star had an article today, from some FBI "profiler".  While it all seems to be logical, it's really just speculation. And it's handy to remember that an FBI "profiler" had a lot to do with starting the OPP down the wrong path in the Guy Paul Morin wrongfull conviction.

Which is not to say I'm building a point of view one way or another.  There's just a vaccum of facts right now, and we're all eager to understand, to whatever degree we can understand, what happened so we can reconstruct the crystal latice illusion of control in our lives.

 

 

al-Qa'bong

Quote:

They may not be taught how to do it, but they're taught to adopt the attitude that it's necessary and good to be done.  They all go through basic training, where they're taught that being a wimp or girly is bad.

 

When I was in basic training we had a female Master Corporal who'd gleefully ask us recruits, "What's the spirit of the bayonet?" to which we were supposed to holler, "To kill!"

I felt like saying, "I dunno, I'm still working on the spirit of the ironing board," but I didn't bother.  I received enough heat for constantly being an individual as it was.

 

 

Michelle

Ha!  That would've been hilarious.  Probably worth whatever punishment you got.

Well, now it would be, anyhow.  Perhaps not at the time.  And I guess it makes a good story either way.  Although I'm not sure why it matters whether the Master Corporal was male or female.

 

al-Qa'bong

In general, the women were way more gung ho than the males, especially among the instructors.

Slumberjack

al-Qa'bong wrote:
I felt like saying, "I dunno, I'm still working on the spirit of the ironing board," 

It's a solitary quest for the most part, where understanding its subtle essence is further hindered when inquiries about what one is doing when ironing generally elicits the same response..as in..'you don't want to know.'

Michelle

Not surprising, al-Q.  They probably had a lot more to prove, and it was probably a lot harder for them than the male instructors to get respect in such a macho environment.  Also, considering how many women get raped by their comrades in the military (at least in the US - do they track it in Canada?), it's not surprising that they would protect themselves with a "don't fuck with me, asshole" kind of attitude.

remind remind's picture

Al'Q doubt they were more "gung ho" (interesting choice of words on several fronts), but they were perhaps reacting as they were/are taught, that they had to be me more unsensitive than the men in order to prove themselves in said man's world.

 

And perhaps the male instructors said the same things or simalr, except it did not seem to be abnormal, and thus sticks out memory wise.

 

War video games make good military recruits, eh!

Michelle

Female soldiers died of dehydration rather than risk sexual assault

Quote:

Because the women, in fear of getting up in the hours of darkness to go out to the portatoilets or the latrines, were not drinking liquids after 3:00 or 4:00 in the afternoon. And in 120-degree heat or warmer, because there was no air conditioning at most of the facilities, they were dying from dehydration in their sleep. And rather than make everybody aware of that, because that’s shocking -- and as a leader, if that’s not shocking to you, then you’re not much of a leader -- so what they told the surgeon to do was, “Don’t brief those details anymore. And don’t say specifically that they’re women. You can provide that in a written report, but don’t brief it in the open anymore.”

According to Professor Benedict, Karpinski had told her there were male soldiers lying in wait out there for the women soldiers. They would pull them into the latrines, abuse them and rape them. When word of this spread, the women became afraid to go out.

...

Montoya also carried a knife around with her to keep herself safe from the other soldiers. "I never intended on using the knife for an Iraqi. I had my M-16 for that. But my knife, I always just kept it for another soldier, because any time I would have any type of strong sexual harassment words spoken, I just mainly felt a little bit more secure, and it was visible, too, to the other soldiers."

She also told Benedict, "There are only three kinds of female the men let you be in the military: a bitch, a ho or a dyke."

 

Michelle

The situation in Canada one short decade ago

Some of the quotes in the article were interesting - instead of being dismayed at all the stories of sexual assault they were dealing with, the men were instead feeling "resentful" that "suspicion was being cast on every man in a Canadian Forces uniform."  It was still all about them and their feelings.

Quote:

For some women, these new investigations may be the way to heal old wounds. One former supply technician who called Maclean's last week said she started to confront the darkest aspects of her 8½-year military career after she read the stories of the other women. She says she was raped four times, and forced to perform oral sex once, during the first 18 months she was in the Forces. The assaults occurred at CFB Shearwater in Dartmouth, N.S., where she was sent as a 19-year-old private after basic training. "The first time, two guys were fighting over me at a party, and I thought it was a joke," she recalls. "Then one picked me up and threw me over his shoulder. I hit my head on a concrete wall and I was knocked out and I woke up in bed with him on top of me." She never reported any of the assaults. The irony of her situation, she says, is that she joined the military to flee from an abusive home - "I went out of the frying pan into the fire" - and says she now thinks she was targeted for abuse because the men around her sensed her vulnerability. Traumatized and depressed, but still keeping her secret, she finally quit the forces in December, 1994 - and now intends to call Baril's hotline.

Master Cpl. Suzie Fortin called the 1-800 line last week. Fortin, an army supply technician at CFB Kingston, Ont., last year successfully pressed charges against a senior non-commissioned officer. She reported harassment (comments such as the suggestion that she should spread his sperm on her face to clear up acne) and an assault in which he pinned her to her desk and shoved his hands down her shirt in January, 1996. In a bitter irony, her attacker was the designated harassment officer for her unit - the man to whom she was supposed to report such abuse. Although the assault charges against him were stayed in a court martial, he was found guilty of five counts of contravening "good order and discipline" last October. Fortin, a 19-year-veteran of the military, continues to be happy with her career.

But Fortin says she wants Baril to know what she went through to win that case: she had to continue to work with her attacker, and says she was discouraged from proceeding at every turn. "I called the complaint line, and they were great, they wanted to know how they could help and what I need," she says. "They're waking up now. They are going to know, this was done to me, and it was wrong, and how I suffered for the way the case was handled." Fortin hopes that by forcing the military to confront her experience, she will smooth the way for other women who wish to join up. "I'm doing this for others," she says. "I don't want them to be naïve. And I don't want them to be afraid."

Michelle

From the same article:

Quote:

Maj. Mary Ellen Timperon was 28 when she enlisted in the Canadian Forces in 1984. She was tough enough to brush aside suggestions by some superior officers that sex might earn her favorable performance reviews, and she rebuffed the soldiers who got drunk and tried to climb into her bed. Instead, she became a military psychologist - and a crusader for women. She helped establish a status-of-women committee and the Athena Centre for women at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ont., did controversial research that uncovered sexual misconduct endured by female cadets and convinced CFB Borden to recognize International Women's Day.

Today she remains determined to change the minds of those soldiers who can't stand the presence of, as she says she has been described, a "feminist bitch" in uniform. Her latest adventure - the establishment last June of a Conflict Resolution Centre at CFB Borden near Barrie, Ont. - has earned her, she says, the nickname "female gestapo."


Doug

Michelle wrote:

That could be.  Either way, the point stands, that the military is a breeding ground for violence against women.

 

I think that's often the case in a lot of situations where you have a group of men who are prepared to all give each other permission to behave badly - it doesn't just happen in the military.

Le T Le T's picture

Quote:
I think that's often the case in a lot of situations where you have a group of men who are prepared to all give each other permission to behave badly - it doesn't just happen in the military.

I guess what is special about the military is the special training in extreme violence coupled with a methodical desensitization to violence.

Michelle

Of course it doesn't just happen in the military.  I don't think there's a feminist on the planet who thinks the military is the sole source of sexism in society. :)

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

My dad was in the military until he was injured in maneuvers in the UK during WWII, then he became a military archivist and author. Eventually he returned to Canada, and in the 1950s raised a family, and my mother also took a full time job as a statistican for the Dominion Bureau of Statistics. Dad's close friends, all military men, would try to get away with all kinds of shitty comments in the early days, until me mudder made it clear they had to behave themselves or get the hell out of her house. They got the message.  Laughing (Jack Granatstein was a close personal friend of my dad's, worked together on a few books, along with Courtney C. J. Bond, another Ottawa author. Some Ottawa bigwigs also filled our living room, and they were well-behaved or they didn't get served drinks). None of that military macho crap was tolerated at our place.

Tommy_Paine

My father was a veteran of WWII, serving with the 1st RCR.   And, he was active with the ANAF, both recreationally and as President of a couple of branches, and various other offices over the years.   My mother, served similarly.   

So, I was exposed to former military people all my formative years and into my twenties.   Of course, those people were not on the leading edge of second wave feminism at the time.   But by the same token, disrespect to women in the club room wasn't tollerated, nor did I hear from my father or his friends stupid macho sexist remarks concerning specific women or women in general.  Having said that, I don't believe every joke or every comment was an enlightened one for that or this age, either.    And, I don't doubt that in those marriages there wasn't incidences of spousal abuse and all the stuff that goes on society wide.

I guess what I mean to say is I never got the sense that there was something systemic coming from the military or association with it that seems indemic in today's military, judging from Michelle's links.

NorthReport

I don't think it is just the military either. I get the impression the feminist gains that have been made are in jeopardy over the place. Overall I don't think that much progress has been made since the seventies.

Tommy_Paine

 

I'm not saying it isn't the military.   Maybe there's been a change over time; surely women joining the forces has created backlash from the knuckle dragging caucus in the military.    And, the other difference is that military policy is made by lifers and the people I knew were volunteers, veterans of WWII and Korea.  

 

 

 

Fotheringay-Phipps

My memories of my father and his squadron mates correspond to those of Boom Boom and Tommy Paine. While they weren't cutting-edge social theorists, they were respectful and even a little awkward around women. Perhaps the difference was that as veterans of WWII, they were part of a mass enlistment, rather than the cherry-picked volunteer army we have today. In those days the armed forces were perhaps more reflective of general social trends, where today many recruits will be at the edges of those trends.

If you want armed forces that truly reflect society's values, some form of draft may be necessary. Of course, professional soldiers hate the draft and all the rebelliousness, indiscipline and fragging that creates.

 

Unionist

Fotheringay-Phipps wrote:

If you want armed forces that truly reflect society's values, some form of draft may be necessary.

Some form of just cause to fight for, reflecting society's values, would also help.

Frmrsldr

Yes, there is an egalitarian democratic quality to a draft.

Jingles

I hear tell the Taliban had a rather swift way of dealing with people like the Colonel.

 

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

Guys, just a reminder that this is in the feminism forum and about a very decorated military guy that did some heinous shit and the last female post was about coverups of rape in the military.  Perhaps, one of you could open a thread somewhere else.  Just sayin'.

al-Qa'bong

Doug wrote:

Michelle wrote:

That could be.  Either way, the point stands, that the military is a breeding ground for violence against women.

 

I think that's often the case in a lot of situations where you have a group of men who are prepared to all give each other permission to behave badly - it doesn't just happen in the military.

My experience, brief though it was, was that we gave each other excuses to behave correctly.  I found that regular societal sexism was pretty foreign in my group.  We were all colleagues.

 

Quote:

And perhaps the male instructors said the same things or simalr, except it did not seem to be abnormal, and thus sticks out memory wise.

 

No, that isn't the case.

skdadl

RevolutionPlease wrote:

Guys, just a reminder that this is in the feminism forum and about a very decorated military guy that did some heinous shit and the last female post was about coverups of rape in the military.  Perhaps, one of you could open a thread somewhere else.  Just sayin'.

 

Well, there has been a quite extensive discussion of military culture in very general terms, so it seems fair to me for a few of us who are old enough to have known a structurally different one to make that point.

 

Both my parents and most of my aunts and uncles served in WWII. Some of the most interesting independent women I've ever known, a few of them still alive in their nineties, joined the RCAF in 1939, tasted independence during their years stationed in the UK, came home to take up offers of university education, and became trail-blazers for other women in a variety of careers.Just about everyone I've described in this paragraph was originally a farm kid who'd come of age during the Depression and known pretty tough times before the war.

 

The wider culture was different in many ways, as others have said, although the war years definitely helped to disrupt class and gender and race barriers in some progressive ways for some people. I knew these people. I suppose many of them (not all) were trained to kill, were at least willing to kill or willing to approve the killing. But once they were home, they just didn't fit the cultural profile that I've seen described above, and I wonder how true that is even now, with a very different kind of armed forces.

 

If anything, our armed forces might have regressed in class terms, the gap between an elite officer corps and working-class kids who join up for an education and a living much greater than it was in wartime. Williams certainly sounds like a guy with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement, and then beyond that he could just be psychopathic. Analysing him and analysing, say, a Clayton Matchee seem to me to require two quite different kinds of analysis.

kropotkin1951

PTSD affected many returning WWII vets but its nice that some posters families missed that experience. My favourite Uncle drank himself to death after serving in italy on the front lines for months. He was not alone.  My grandfather came back from the Great War with PTSD or shellshocked and died within a decade.  None of the women from his generation will even mention his name so there is a cloud over what he actually did to them when he returned.

My parents didn't talk about those broken colleagues and my Mom like others refused to have a bunch of drunk SOB's in her house either but nobody thought to give them mental health services to overcome the deep psychological wounds fighting a war caused in many.

Bacchus

My uncle, who barely if ever talked (if you got 10 words out of him in a row, you should have gotten a medal) came back from Dunkirk as a dispatch rider. He came home and my mother and her parents and siblings sat around him as he would not stop talking, even when eating or drinking he kept babbling about what he saw (Ive heard it, it was not nice). There came a knock on the door and there were 2 MPs there, telling them they were there to take my uncle to a rest camp in Scotland. They said all the dispatch riders were going and he was there for 3 months before returning to the war (with the Desert Rats in Africa)

 

My mother joined the RAF and was a extremely independant woman who took no shit from anyone. Woe betid any man from the legion that made a demeaning remark. He never did so again. She had a better war record than did my father

PraetorianFour

Jingles wrote:

I hear tell the Taliban had a rather swift way of dealing with people like the Colonel.

Considering the Taliban's views on woman as humans they would swiftly promote the Colonel to General.

Quote:

If anything, our armed forces might have regressed in class terms, the gap between an elite officer corps and working-class kids who join up for an education and a living much greater than it was in wartime.

Do you mean WW2 Era wartime?

If so I would disagree.  Today the lines between "eliete officer corps" and working-class are closer than ever. More and more you see working class "grunts" with college and University degrees either joining the CF as a non-commisioned member or getting their degree through one of the education programs.

The cultrual difference is closer too.  It's much more common for "the troops" to rub shoulders with their officer counter parts outside of the work place today.  Grunts are much more worldly than they were 50 years ago [Though they still often have  fairly narrow "world experience"].

Just my 2 cents.

skdadl

kropotkin1951 wrote:

PTSD affected many returning WWII vets but its nice that some posters families missed that experience. My favourite Uncle drank himself to death after serving in italy on the front lines for months. He was not alone.  My grandfather came back from the Great War with PTSD or shellshocked and died within a decade.  None of the women from his generation will even mention his name so there is a cloud over what he actually did to them when he returned.

My parents didn't talk about those broken colleagues and my Mom like others refused to have a bunch of drunk SOB's in her house either but nobody thought to give them mental health services to overcome the deep psychological wounds fighting a war caused in many.

 

That was very moving to read, kropotkin. One of my uncles died in WWI, smothered in the mud at Passchendaele. I've always thought that was why my father joined up instantly in 1939, although by then he was old enough that he could have ducked that.

 

It's worth remembering that many many of the returning WWI vets had been politically radicalized. They had seen real hell, and yet they came back to a Canada that hadn't reformed much at all. The Winnipeg General Strike was probably the most dramatic expression of that anger, the On-to-Ottawa Trek as well, but the anger seethed away, maybe not so much here as in, eg, Germany, but it was class anger.

skdadl

PraetorianFour wrote:

Today the lines between "eliete officer corps" and working-class are closer than ever. More and more you see working class "grunts" with college and University degrees either joining the CF as a non-commisioned member or getting their degree through one of the education programs.

The cultrual difference is closer too.  It's much more common for "the troops" to rub shoulders with their officer counter parts outside of the work place today.  Grunts are much more worldly than they were 50 years ago [Though they still often have  fairly narrow "world experience"].

Just my 2 cents.

 

Well, I'm interested to read that, and it gives me hope. I feel a lot for the kids who just wanted a job and an education, y'know? If you've read the stories of the U.S. resisters who came here hoping for sanctuary, you'll know those were the most powerful motives for so many in that much more troubled army.

 

To get back to the topic, though: I still know, as some wrote above, that every invading army of any kind has always raped and killed -- not all soldiers, but a lot of them, maybe a lot of them otherwise nice guys. Women live with that thought of what war can do. And I woke up early this morning thinking of Williams sneaking into my place when I was sleeping, and I just had to get up and turn on all the lights. Women live with that thought too. A lot of women around Belleville will be shuddering for some time to come.

kropotkin1951

PraetorianFour wrote:

Jingles wrote:

I hear tell the Taliban had a rather swift way of dealing with people like the Colonel.

Considering the Taliban's views on woman as humans they would swiftly promote the Colonel to General.

 

Which faction of the Taliban do you mean and from what region of the area?

Are you talking about individual Taliban fighters or do you have access to the philosophical and religious believes that are considered dogma by the Taliban leadership?  This is the propaganda that justifies our troops occupation of this foreign country and it feeds the culture of violence.

The idea that anyone including someone fighting in the Taliban would be agreement with what this serial rapist and murderer did is disgusting.

Most resistance movements have had very strict rules of engagement that if breached resulted in immediate execution by your former comrades in arms so he would be likely be dealt with swiftly.

remind remind's picture

kropotkin1951 wrote:
my Mom like others refused to have a bunch of drunk SOB's in her house either but nobody thought to give them mental health services to overcome the deep psychological wounds fighting a war caused in many.

 

SOB"s = sons of bitches

 

Just sayin.......

 

 

NorthReport

Good catch remind.

kropotkin1951

Anything substantive remind or just drive by shootings.  I used her language in the context of the anecdote. 

I am so sorry I don't like everything the NDP does.

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

Meh, should be cool to disacknowledge acronyms like that.

Pages

Topic locked