James Lovelock: Humans are too stupid to prevent climate change

112 posts / 0 new
Last post
j.m.

Double Posted

Frustrated Mess Frustrated Mess's picture

Could a devout Catholic admit a virgin giving birth isn't credible?

George Victor

Y'know, the weather this spring is starting out much like that of '88.  You remember that one eh, Martha?  Real hot...and dry, too.  Had folks talkin'  about climate change all of a sudden.  Why, remember the farmer who painted somethin' about climate in six foot letters across the front of his barn?  Yep, folks didn't get all bogged down in questions of persanality and accuse others of being constipated in those days, eh? No siree.

Guess folks have to do something to keep them occupied...but you'd think they'd actually try to say something about the science itself, somewhere in all that chatter, eh Martha?

Frustrated Mess Frustrated Mess's picture

George Victor wrote:

 Yep, folks didn't get all bogged down in questions of persanality and accuse others of being constipated in those days, eh? No siree.

 

You were saying about Connelly?

There are wonderful people reading the science and acting on it. Lovelock is not about the science and never has been. He is an industrial schill. Acknowledge it. And then forget him. The real work is taking place not in the corrupt minds of ancient old men but in the young minds of the global south where the luxury of keeping the lights on while the planet boils isn't an option.

See ya, George.

George Victor

Transplant reminds us the Wikibullies'  name is Connolley...I cannot now forget the guy who altered some 1500 Wiki passages to suit his idea of the universe.

Yeah, FM, we are never going to discuss the Gaia theory over a morning coffee (or lazy afternoon beer) I guess - as long as the Guardian finds him quotable, we'll probably go on about the old fart until he's no longer extant. Doubt his science will disappear, though. In fact I fully expect that some really, really hot, dry summer hereabouts, op-ed editors all over the place will rediscover him and in a knowing way say: "Well, we were warned",  using that ubiquitous "we" as though Homo sapiens can be lumped together in the way that editors and the politically correct find so convenient. 

From the "global south"...  The Weather Makers?  Naw, he largely support JL.  The Kenyan woman, Nobel winner, who's idea is to keep ahead of desertification by planting trees?  She's already history. 

Just one last missive please, FM?  What young minds from the "global south"?Then I can get reading.  

Happy gardening.

remind remind's picture

*sigh*

 

...was going to start a new thread for ya, butif you want to carry on  up to you

j.m.

George Victor wrote:

Just one last missive please, FM?  What young minds from the "global south"?Then I can get reading.

I'll field that, George. The ones that fight tooth and nail to go to respectable institutions in their home countries or in neighbouring countries just be heard (provided that they get that far ahead), or the ones that settle for state-run institutions because they could not get ahead. And then there are millions of Lovelocks and other brilliant minds walking around hawking goods on streets and in markets, and working in their homes micro-producing. They were aborted from the 'excellence' trajectory because life is more difficult than enjoying the fruits of colonialism (ironically part of the reason our earth is in such a mess).

These people constitute the "too stupid" group Lovelock talks about from his Western-funded excellence.

 

Then there are the privileged minds and the very few underprivileged that infiltrate parochial western academia, like in the UK/Europe and North America, by studying in western institutions, become aligned with western outlooks on the global south, and go back home and tell you what you want to hear.

Geez, I wonder why you never heard of them!?

 

j.m.

I wouldn't mind a conversation about scientists as colonialist elitists, even the seemingly progressive ones, remind.

So elitist that they think they can spew unsubstantiated claims under the guise of 'expertise'.

George Victor

j.m.:

"These people constitute the "too stupid" group Lovelock talks about from his Western-funded excellence."

 

They do like hell, and you know it. Lovelock is talking about twits like yourself who don't "dig" his science and avoid talk about science like the plague itself. "unsubstantiated claims under the guise of 'expertise' ". The Gaia theory is now mainstream science, you silly ass. The effect on Earth is going to first affect all those young people now nearest the doldrums, as the rainfall falls into an increasingly narrow band. But what the hell.

 

Please remind, no more of this innuendo about elitist, snotty, ruling class scientists. Anyone looking in woould think we picked up folks from Marxist madrassas.

j.m.

George Victor wrote:

j.m.:

"These people constitute the "too stupid" group Lovelock talks about from his Western-funded excellence."

 

They do like hell, and you know it. Lovelock is talking about twits like yourself who don't "dig" his science and avoid talk about science like the plague itself. "unsubstantiated claims under the guise of 'expertise' ". The Gaia theory is now mainstream science, you silly ass. The effect on Earth is going to first affect all those young people now nearest the doldrums, as the rainfall falls into an increasingly narrow band. But what the hell.

 

Please remind, no more of this innuendo about elitist, snotty, ruling class scientists. Anyone looking in woould think we picked up folks from Marxist madrassas.

Your point comes across very racist, unless you care to clarify what you mean by your affirmation "they do like hell". As for calling me a silly ass, I think we know very well where bathroom humour gets us (shall we have another modified verse of "blowin' in the wind", FM?).

I was referring to his "too stupid" comment and the authoritarianism that will ensue, and then his comment (one day later) that the world is screwed and we should enjoy it while we can. Seriously George, you missed the entire point of my comment (and you appear to be purposefully ignoring certain inconvenient facts). I shall rephrase it again, and maybe this time you won't come out guns a'blazing: do you believe that parochialism doesn't exist in Western academia? and that post-colonial and marxist-inspired theories do not explain why you can't seem to find a smart person from the global south?

 

oldgoat

long thread

Pages

Topic locked