The Afghan people will win - part 17

102 posts / 0 new
Last post
NDPP

WikiLeaks to Release Video of Civilian, Journalists being Murdered in Airstrike (and vid)

http://rawstory.com/2010/03/wikileaks-release-video-civilians-journalist...

"In a video released Friday, a Russia Today broadcast and discussion of the pending release of the video"

NDPP

Aafia Siddiqui: Victimized by American Depravity

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/03/aafia-siddiqui-victimized-by-ameri...

"On February 3, 2010, after a sham trial, the Department of Justice announced Siddiqui's conviction for 'attempting to murder US national in Afghanistan and six additional charges.' When sentenced on May 6, she faces up to 20 years for each attempted murder charge, possible life in prison on the firearm's charge, and eight years on each assault charge...

Bogusly charged and convited, Siddiqui was guilty only of being Muslim in America.."

Webgear

[VANCOUVER - Apr. 1, 2010] - An Angus Reid Public Opinion poll-the first conducted since U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton urged Canada to reconsider its decision to end its military commitment in Afghanistan in 2011-finds that a large majority of Canadians reject the possibility of changes to the announced departure date for combat troops.

In the online survey of a representative sample of 1,006 Canadians, 79 per cent of respondents oppose Canadian troops taking part in a combat mission after the current mandate ends in 2011. Only 16 per cent of Canadians would consent to such an arrangement.

Most Canadians, however, would like the country to remain engaged in Afghanistan. More than half of respondents (54%) would support Canadian troops training the Afghan military after 2011.

In addition, almost two thirds of respondents (64%) would agree with Canadian soldiers participating in activities related to development and governance work.

 

Canadians Reject Extending Combat Mission in Afghanistan Beyond 2011:

Respondents would welcome other arrangements to support Afghanistan, such as work related to training and development.

Frmrsldr

Webgear wrote:

Most Canadians, however, would like the country to remain engaged in Afghanistan. More than half of respondents (54%) would support Canadian troops training the Afghan military after 2011.

In addition, almost two thirds of respondents (64%) would agree with Canadian soldiers participating in activities related to development and governance work.

If this were to occur, it would mean an "exponentially" smaller number of Canadian troops would remain engaged in Afghanistan beyond 2011 (most likely in Kabul, I hear).

Who would they be? Would they be from (a) unit(s) already there halfway through their tour? Would they be troops starting a new ROTO? Would they be a mix?

My guess is, if from troops already there, they would probably have a "Sucks to be you/us" attitude and would probably be disgruntled about it.

What's your sense?

Webgear

As far as I can tell and sense, all troops will be pulled out as of 2011 with the exception of those at the embassy. All combat missions will cease in by next spring, and then the long process of removing equipment and supplies.The CDS has been very clear about this in the press.

I believe we will be part of a major UN mission late 2011 or early 2012.

However politicans and political groups change thier mind all the time, we may be there longer than next year.\

If we do stay, it will a new roto.

Frmrsldr

Webgear wrote:

However politicans and political ... [parties] ... change thier mind all the time, we may be there longer than next year.\

Yeah. Right now that sleazy bugger Harper is strongly sending out the message that there will be NO troops engaged in Afghanistan beyond 2011 because he is under fire over Torturegate and he realizes that the majority of Canadians are opposed to the war: Two things that are causing the most damage to the Conservative Party's chance of getting a majority next election.

However, if any or all of these variables change to the benefit of the Conservative Party, then Harper, MacKay and (possibly) Cannon will most likely change the tune back to troops staying beyond 2011.

Fidel

[url=http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18458]Canada's Role in Afghanistan: What Would Iggy Do on Afghanistan?[/url] What would the Liberals do?  by Thomas Walkom

Frmrsldr

If the Liberals are smart, they will go with the current flow as expressed by the Conservatives like Harper, MacKay and Cannon on this issue. "No troops beyond 2011."

Webgear

 Some senior NDP and Liberal supporters have been pushing for a Congo mission.  I think that is where the troops are going in 2012.

Frmrsldr

Webgear wrote:

Some senior NDP and Liberal supporters have been pushing for a Congo mission.  I think that is where the troops are going in 2012.

As a result of executions and rapes committed by DRC government troops under U.N. auspices, the U.N. has decided to end its mission within the next couple of months.

At the latest NATO summit, MacKay was talking about a more "aggressive" Canadian foreign policy.

Frmrsldr

Jerome Starkey wrote:

US special forces soldiers dug bullets out of their victims' bodies in the bloody aftermath of a botched night raid, then washed the wounds with alcohol before lying to their superiors about what happened, Afghan investigators have told The Times. Two pregnant women, a teenage girl, a police officer and his brother were shot on February 12 when US and Afghan special forces stormed their home in Khataba village, outside Gardez in eastern Afghanistan. The precise composition of the force has never been made public.

http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2010/04/05/us-special-forces-tried-to-co...

Jason Ditz wrote:

But all of this still leaves an enormous loose string to tie up. If there was no "gruesome discovery" as claimed, then the US special forces responsible for the raid not only killed those pregnant women, but bound and gagged their corpses to try to cover it up (which is what the family claimed the day after it happened, to the dismissal of everyone).

http://news.antiwar.com/2010/04/04/nato-admits-killing-civilians-in-febr...

NDPP

Marja - Game Over Vol 8D

http://www.militaryproject.org/?vol=8D

"If I lived 1,000 years I would prefer the Taliban.."

The Kandahar warlord who has Presidential Protection

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/the-kandahar-warlord-who-ha...

"The prevailing wisdom now is that efforts to have Amed Wali removed have failed, and that co-opting him and the other Kandahari warlords is the best option..The hope is that the warlords will realize that 'if the Americans aren't here I'm dead' and rein in their behaviour. But it's a risky strategy..

All across Kandahar inhabitants repeat the complaint the west has empowered the Mafiosi at the expense of honest men...It was reaction against rule by warlords 16 years ago that swept the Taliban to power..."

NDPP

DND Ordered Military Police to Withold Information on Detainees

http://www.thehilltimes.ca/page/view/afghan-04-05-2010

"CF headquarters ordered Military Police in Kandahar to whithold information about detainees from the allied International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, an email among the 2,600 documents the government tabled in Parliament says...The government has refused to disclose publicly since the controversy begain how many detainees Canadian soldiers transferred to Afghan authorities, and the email indicates the policy of secrecy over the transfers began soon after the Canadian troops engaged with Taliban in 2006 late summer battles..'

Frmrsldr

Who is Mr. McCrackers?

Jeff Huber wrote:

... During the Rummy regime, McChrystal commanded Special Operations Command, a secretive outfit that journalist Seymour Hersh of the New Yorker described as an "executive assassination ring" that reported "directly to the Cheney office." SOCOM's functions, as Hersh put it, involved "going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them." McChrystal's SOCOM hijinks also involved extensive torture, murky connections with mercenary outfits like Blackwater, and use of questionable intelligence gained by private interests who gained government contracts through their connections with Defense Department official Michael D. Furlong.

http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2010/04/05/mccrackers/

NDPP

The Case for the Impeachment of President Obama

http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/?q=node/504

"Let me state it simply: President Barack Obama, as well as Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and Treasury Secretary Geithner, should be impeached for war crimes against the Constitution.."

Unionist

It's not enough that they murder civilians:

[url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2010/0408/US-military-.... military slaughters sheep in apology for killing Afghan civilians[/url]

I wish I had made this up, but the U.S. military beat me to it.

 

Cueball Cueball's picture
NDPP

The Drug Addicted War in Afghanistan

http://japanfocus.org/-Peter_Dale-Scott/3340

"The Afghan state of Hamid Karzai is a corrupt narco-state, to which Afghans are forced to pay bribes each year of $2.5 Billion, a quarter of the national economy..."

Troops Out Now!

NDPP

Bondage, Beatings and a Few Questions from the Governor

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/bondage-beatings-and-a-few-...

A Detainee tells his story...

NDPP

Gulbuddin Hekmatyr, the Messiah of Darkness

http://www.zcommunications.org/gulbuddin-hekmatyar-the-messiah-of-darkne...

"One of the warlords who may soon star in the new US efforts to rebrand fundamentalists as potential government partners is Gulbudin Hekmatyar, a brutal Afghan insurgent commander responsible for dozens of deadly attacks on coalition troops.."

Fidel

NoDifferencePartyPooper wrote:

Gulbuddin Hekmatyr, the Messiah of Darkness

http://www.zcommunications.org/gulbuddin-hekmatyar-the-messiah-of-darkne...

"One of the warlords who may soon star in the new US efforts to rebrand fundamentalists as potential government partners is Gulbudin Hekmatyar, a brutal Afghan insurgent commander responsible for dozens of deadly attacks on coalition troops.."

Yes, Hekmatyar was a superstar of terrorism for the CIA and Saudis during anticommunist jihad of the eighties and nineties. They shovelled half a billion dollars to him every year for a number of years. And he says 9/11 hijackers were all trained in terror on US and European soil. GH says the CIA and ISI were very familiar with all of the 9/11 perps in the years leading up to 9/11/01.

NDPP

Sounds like the perfect man for the job...

Unionist

[url=http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/04/11/afghanistan-canadian.html]Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan[/url]

Quote:
A Canadian soldier [Pvt. Tyler William Todd] died in Afghanistan after stepping on an improvised explosive device while on foot patrol Sunday morning, just southwest of Kandahar city. [...]

The Canadian battle group supported an Afghan National Army sweep of the area further south of Belanday a few weeks ago and [b]had been assured by villagers that the Taliban had fled[/b].

See? There's a silver lining. Clearly, there are grounds for a lawsuit against the villagers.

Quote:
[Brig.-Gen. Daniel] Menard described him as someone who was dedicated and likeable with a good sense of humour.

"Tyler was a practical joker. He would often hide rocks and candies in the other soldiers' beds," the general said.

Apparently he wasn't alone.

 

Unionist
Polunatic2

Kady O'Malley's liveblogging from yesterday's Afgan Parliamentary Cttee meeting. New allegations from former DND translator Malgarai Ahmadshah including: 

  • teenage boy shot in head resulting in coverup and sweep of 10 Afghan males from age of 10 to 90 who were all turned over to Afghan NDS
  • 90 year old man shackled and thrown to the ground before being turned over by Cdn troops to Afghans
  • Canada "outsourced" torture to NDS
  • explosives test is a joke because the ground is saturated with explosives
  • translator's family info was leaked by Cdn military to the Taliban resulting in threats
  • everyone dealing with detainee transfers knew about torture
  • ad nauseum
Frmrsldr

Interesting survey just polled in Kandahar province:

http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2010/04/18/94-percent-of-kandaharis-w...

Fidel

Frmrsldr wrote:

Interesting survey just polled in Kandahar province:

http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2010/04/18/94-percent-of-kandaharis-w...

Ninety-one percent of the respondents supported the convening of a "Loya Jirga," or "grand assembly" of leaders as a way of ending the conflict, with 54 percent "strongly" supporting it, and 37 percent "somewhat" supporting it. That figure appears to reflect support for President Karzai’s proposal for a "peace Jirga" in which the Taliban would be invited to participate.

Loya Jirga? What the heck's that? And, do our stooges know about this? Should there be someone to mediate other than the Saudis and Pakistani ISI/CIA?

NDPP

Canada Not Aiming to Win, Just Not Lose

http://thechronicleherald.ca/Opinion/1177960.html

"One Canadian general recently disclosed to me in confidence that this was because NATO has been approaching this fight with the intent of not losing rather than attempting to actually defeat the insurgency. If that is the case, someone needs to explain this premise to all the families and friends of our far too many casualties to date: Canada's sons and daughters died to prolong a war that the US and NATO were not truly committed to winning."

House Speaker to Rule on Historic Confrontation Between PM, Opposition Parties

http://www.thehilltimes.ca/page/view/historic-04-19-2010

"House of Commons Speaker Peter Milliken will rule this week on the historic confrontation between the opposition parties and the government over Prime Minister Stephen Harper's refusal to hand over secret information about potential detainee torture in Afghanistan, sources say.."

Frmrsldr

NoDifferencePartyPooper wrote:

Canada Not Aiming to Win, Just Not Lose

http://thechronicleherald.ca/Opinion/1177960.html

"One Canadian general recently disclosed to me in confidence that this was because NATO has been approaching this fight with the intent of not losing rather than attempting to actually defeat the insurgency. If that is the case, someone needs to explain this premise to all the families and friends of our far too many casualties to date: Canada's sons and daughters died to prolong a war that the US and NATO were not truly committed to winning."

 

The day we lost the Afghan war was the day George W. Bush woke up in the morning and said, "Let's have a war in Afghanistan."

It takes a special kind of genius to go to war against Afghanistan. A country where 100,000 Russian troops and 10 years in the making failed to achieve victory. A country where after 100 years, the British were defeated. A country where everyone who invaded and occupied it failed and eventually left. Its title of "Graveyard of Empires" is well deserved.

We were never in it to win it.

Cueball Cueball's picture
Doug
NDPP

The Afghan War: No Blood for Opium

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18768

"The hidden military agenda is to protect the drug trade.."

Britain [and Canada!] Hands Over Prisoners in Afghanistan to Face Torture

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/7607442/Brita...

"British troops are handing over Taliban suspects to the Afghan security services to face 'horrible abuse and torture', the High Court has been told..."

Why the Kandahar Offensive Could Backfire

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/army-researchers-why-the-kandaha...

"The southern Afghan province of Kandahar trusts the Taliban more than the government. And that's according to a survey commissioned by the US Army.."

 

Fidel

NoDifferencePartyPooper wrote:
Why the Kandahar Offensive Could Backfire

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/army-researchers-why-the-kandaha...

A reader comment"

Posted by: jacktoads | 04/18/10 | 12:48 am |

just certify the opioides for big pharma and make sure the peasents get paid off the top,wtf,to easy,really yer all about loitering,so tye yer self up then,really probably using whack and smack to “become a drug/war lord made in acme america god dam the pusher man

 

I think those are Steppenwolf song lyrics. Dam the pusher man. I think some people, not "Jack Toads" though apparently, are under the impression that Afghan drug lords and fundamentalists were an indigenous occurrence created by a brutal Soviet colonization effort during the 1980s. And this is untrue. Opportunists like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Abdul Razul Sayyaf were chosen by the CIA and Pakistani ISI to setup as drug barons because they had no popular support base in Afghanistan. And because they were not popular, the CIA and ISI knew they could control them. But I'd like to bet that that commentator "Jack Toads" is aware of that, too. ha ha

 

Frmrsldr

Oh, and don't forget that other drug lord on the CIA payroll, Ahmed Wali Karzai, our puppet President we are propping up in Kabul - Hamid Karzai's brother.

NDPP

The Anatomy of America's [and its compliant appendage Canada's] Defeat in Afghanistan

http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?223418

"lack of knowledge of the Pashtun culture is another important factor ensuring US defeat in Afghanistan - there are two sources wherein this lack contributes to the permanence of hostility of Pashtuns toward the US and allies. The first issue is the tribal structure and the cohesion within the tribes in matters of self defense.

When a member of a tribe or subtribe is killed, the killer is not only the enemy of the family whose member he has killed, but rather he has gained the enmity of the tribe whose member he has murdered. Thus, the US [and Canadian] forces have turned tribes, sub-tribes and villages against them by slaughtering their members in the hundreds and thousands.

The second source is a tenet of the Pashtunwali - the Pashtun code of honour. This tenet is that of revenge, which goes hand in hand with tribal cohesion. A Pashtun father, brother, son and tribesmen have to avenge the death of their relative. There is an old saying that after a Pashtun took his revenge after a 100 years, he said, 'I think I rushed it a bit'..."

Fidel

Yes, exactly. Malalai Joya mentioned something about Wali funding covert ops in Afghanistan to threaten his brother's political opposition. Violence and US-managed elections seem to go hand in hand.

[url=http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18522]Canadian Peter Dale Scott[/url] praises US historian Alfred McCoy for revealing the CIA's deep involvement with the global drug dealing since Burma and Golden Triangle glory days. But then Scott says that the CIA-Afghan drug alliance was not the same casual partnership so much as a deliberate one. PDS implies that professor McCoy may have something to fear from news journalist Gary Webb's experience after Webb aggressively reporting the CIA's Iran-Contra drug connection in the 1980s. Webb also happened to be one of three Bush family biographers who all committed suicide. The odds against accidental deaths of three people connected in such a way are fairly high. And yet it happened.

Quote:
But in a very strange sentence, McCoy suggests that the CIA was passively drawn into drug alliances in the course of combating Soviet forces in Afghanistan in the years 1979-88, whereas in fact the CIA clearly helped create them precisely to fight the Soviets:

In one of history's ironic accidents, the southern reach of communist China and the Soviet Union had coincided with Asia's opium zone along this same mountain rim, drawing the CIA into ambiguous alliances with the region's highland warlords.

There was no such “accident” in Afghanistan, where the first local drug lords on an international scale – Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Abu Rasul Sayyaf – were in fact launched internationally as a result of massive and ill-advised assistance from the CIA, in conjunction with the governments of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. While other local resistance forces were accorded second-class status, these two clients of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, precisely because they lacked local support, pioneered the use of opium and heroin to build up their fighting power and financial resources.1 Both, moreover, became agents of salafist extremism, attacking the indigenous Sufi-influenced Islam of Afghanistan. And ultimately both became sponsors of al Qaeda.2

NDPP

US Military Suffers Major Defeat in Karengal Valley

http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2/642019287?page=NewsArticle&id=13935&new...

"The US military has retreated from a base in the remote Karengal Valley after spending over 4 years trying to hold the ground. The US forces even negotiated the terms of their defeat, paying the resistance fighters and leaving them the base fully intact with buildings, fuel, generators and military equipment in order to be allowed a peaceful retreat out of the valley.."

Dancing Boys of Afghanistan (and vid)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/22/dancing-boys-of-afghanistan_n_5...

"Bacha Bazi Documentary exposes horrific sexual abuse of young Afghan boys.."

This is how some of the Afghan elite Canada supports amuse themselves

Cueball Cueball's picture

Soviet Invasion Redux: USA retreats to the Cities

US rethinks small, remote bases in Afghanistan

Quote:
The March 29 battle was typical of those at the tiny bases of just a few dozen soldiers known as combat outposts, or COPs, whose roles are being reevaluated at a time of more emphasis on using forces to defend population centers.

Last week's withdrawal from the Korengal Valley, the scene of some of the war's most intense fighting, underscored the new policy, and was tacit admission that maintaining remote, difficult-to-defend outposts was not the best use of resources.

Frmrsldr

Jason Ditz wrote:

NATO Chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen warned that no exit strategy could involve a "run for the exits," and there seems to be no danger of that, as the alliance's plan seems to cement NATO's presence as an occupying power over much of Afghanistan for untold decades to come.

http://news.antiwar.com/2010/04/23/afghan-exit-strategy-wont-involve-rem...

NDPP

Paltry Humanitarian Priorities

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18846

"Canada's contributions to Afghanistan's death toll, in the ironically named 'Operation Enduring Freedom' (Oct 2001-3rd June 2003) resulted in eternity's 'enduring freedom' for up to 23,600 fellow human beings, young, old. Even the unborn in their mother's wombs. The 'Coalition' mass murders at checkpoints, in vehicles, schools, homes, markets, communities, continue unabated.."

Mike Stirner

Who are the afghan people exactly?

Frmrsldr

Mike Stirner wrote:

Who are the afghan people exactly?

Asking a question like that is like asking the question, "Who are Canadians, exactly?"

Um, how 'bout the Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazara's etc., who live in Afghanistan and call Afghanistan their home?

Does that answer your question?

NDPP

No Friendly Wavs Only Hatred

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/22/afghanistan-british-troops-h...

"In Sangin, says a farmer, 'people are sick of night raids and being treated badly by the foreigners.."

Assume the same for Canada

Unionist

Mike Stirner wrote:

Who are the afghan people exactly?

Excellent question - generally asked by those who think we need to tell the Afghan people how to run their society. Here are some typical answers:

1. They're the Afghans who think the way "we" do.

2. They're the Afghans who trust armed foreigners with their security.

3. They're the Afghans that NATO, the U.S., the UK, and Canada like.

The rest are Taliban.

 

Cueball Cueball's picture

I guess this belongs here: Proud to be Afghan

Frmrsldr

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaha

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

I'll let you ponder this one:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1269463/Afghanistan-Po...

Laughing

Unionist
Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

 

 

wrecks

What a bad assed picture...

Frmrsldr

Pentagon Report: Still Not Enough Troops in Afghanistan.

Jason Ditz wrote:

But in what is rapidly becoming the ultimate example of a mission that grows to exceed whatever resources it is given, the Pentagon's latest report on Afghanistan is warning that they still don't have enough troops to cover even half of the "key districts" in the nation, let alone the rest of the country.

http://news.antiwar.com/2010/04/29/pentagon-report-still-not-enough-troo...

Another killing of an innocent Afghan civilian in his home:

Jason Ditz wrote:

But this time we do know the victim. Amanullah, a 30 year old auto mechanic and father of five, who made a panicked phone call to his distant relative, Afghan MP Safiya Sidiqi, that the family compound was being raided by what he assumed was a "gang of thieves."

He had no reason to think anything different. After all, who figures that the US would launch a night raid against the family home of a member of parliament? Shot six times by the raiding US troops, including in the face and heart, Amanullah was slain on the spot.

In the raid, the US troops handcuffed everyone in the compound and took fingerprints, they claimed they were looking for a "Taliban facilitator." They never did find him.

http://news.antiwar.com/2010/04/29/afghan-mechanic-father-of-five-killed...

Is Karzai heading for the end game?

Shahid R. Siddiqi wrote:

Leaders who place themselves in the service of imperialist masters are in fact weaklings, despite their trappings of power. They can break free or follow an independent course only at the peril of their lives. Refusal to fall in line may lead to an accident or a military putsch. Afghanistan has been witness to many such actions.

Karzai cannot survive without U.S. support and is in no position to threaten, confront or defy it. Yet if he does, one doesn't have to be a Nostradamus to predict his fall.

A sound piece of advice for Karzai was offered by Justin Raimondo of antiwar.com: "Get out of town fast, because "the richest man on the planet" wouldn't do well at Bagram".

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/04/29/is-karzai-heading-for-the...

NATO forces face four more years of combat in Afghanistan:

Richard Norton-Taylor wrote:

British and other Nato troops could be expected to be engaged in combat roles for "another three or four years", he [Mark Sedwill, a former UK ambassador to Afghanistan] said. Thereafter, they could be expected to remain in Afghanistan, training and mentoring local forces, for a further 10 to 15 years ... But it was important, he added, not to expect an end of violence to be a precondition for a handover. The questions were what was an acceptable level of violence in Afghanistan and, as important, the degree to which Afghans felt that their security and institutions of government were improving.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/29/afghanistan-combat-nato-offi...

When the war started, it was total victory, defeat the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and create a democratic government and society in Afghanistan. Later, it was pacify the country and create a democratic government and society.

Now, NATO says there is at least going to be four more years of war after which we will leave with a 'reasonable' level of violence, a reasonable level of security, a reasonable or 'acceptable' level of corruption and a 'reasonably' democratic and accountable government - to be determined by 'Afghan' standards, not 'international' standards.

My, how the U.S./NATO/ISAF bar for standards and hoped for objectives has fallen concerning Afghanistan. How many more years and how much lower will these standards fall, one wonders?

NDPP

Seven Deadly Sins in Afghanistan

http://www.countercurrents.org/swanson300410.htm

"If we could establish that funding an escalation of war in Afghanistan was illegal, immoral, against the public will, economically catastrophic, counter-productive on its own terms, and a cynically motivated intentional failure, well then nothing would change.

Unless people use that information for pressuring their representatives to vote NO. Because most of this is pretty easily known. Nonetheless I think its a good place to start, so let me take these points one at a time.."

Tories, Grits Talking Post 2011 Role in Afghanistan

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/tories-grits-talkin...

"The future of the Afghan mission is quietly being shaped in the corridors and backrooms of Parliament Hill.."

Pages

Topic locked