Opposition leaders typically are unpopular/obscure until election campaign when all bets are off

4 posts / 0 new
Last post
Rob8305
Opposition leaders typically are unpopular/obscure until election campaign when all bets are off

Just a note to remind everyone who may be frustrated with the current political situation.  Jean Chretien and Stephen Harper both were massively unpopular leaders and viewed as yesterday's man vs right wing hidden agenda nutjob.

Indeed, there was Campbell mania in 1993 before she ran one of the most incompetent and bitter campaigns in Canadian history.  A review of the record shows that she was leading or tied in the polls. Angus Reid had it 37-35 Libs and Comquest had it 36-33 PC going into the 1993 campaign.  People were far from ready to embrace Jean Chretien at the outset.  He ran a brilliant campaign and won.

Stephen Harper was similar. In the summer of 2005, he was 14 points behind the Libs and Paul Martin's party was in majority territory. Harper looked finished.  He ran a brilliant campaign from the start in 2006 and then the income trust scandal pushed him over the top into government territory.

In both cases, there was a mood of disenchantment and a hint of scandal with the sitting government but no oppositon party had yet arisen to the challenge and captured the imagination of the public.  The campaign changed things.  I think that is what will happen in the next federal election. 

The Liberals or NDP will have a strike out debate performance or awesome stump performance and erase this lead that Harper has right now once the next election starts.  Look at the fundamental dynamnics. Who are the facts on the ground favorable to once they are exposed day after day. That is how to determine who will win the next election rather than freaking out because the Cons have a lead with just 31% in the polls.

 

JKR

Rob8305 wrote:

Look at the fundamental dynamnics. Who are the facts on the ground favorable to once they are exposed day after day. That is how to determine who will win the next election rather than freaking out because the Cons have a lead with just 31% in the polls.

Harper is probably spending time in the middle of the night strategising ways to counter the disadvantage incumbents find themselves in after being in power for awhile.

Some of his ideas might be:

-  Get the voters to fear that the opposition partys are secretly planning on forming a coalition again. Convince the voters that the Liberals are planning another treasonous coalition government with the "socialists and separatists".

- Throw as much dirt at Ignatieff as possible. Convince Canadians that Ignatieff is an American, out of touch effete Thurston Howell III, who  is in it for power.

- Convince Canadians that the Conservatives are the reason Canada has outperformed the rest of the G8.

- That the NDP and Liberals want to tax Canadians to death.

- That the NDP and Liberals will create huge deficits and debt.

- That the NDP and Liberals don't care about the middle class and represent special interest groups.

- That the NDP and Liberals are city slickers who don't understand the common sense rural areas.

- That the NDP and Liberals are soft on crime, They want to parole Hamolka and give a pension to Clifford Olson.

Harper probably has many more ideas.

 

So how can the opposition parties counter these sorts of claims?

 

Rob8305

The difference this time is that whereas Dion was an incompetent campaigner and debater, Ignatieff, I suspect, will shine in the debates.  I think the debates will be the moment that Ignatieff shakes perceptions loose of him.  Being honest, I don't see any way that Layton and the NDP could form government (even the Lib Dem surge in the UK has reversed)

ottawaobserver

It's funny, because I have totally the opposite expectation from Ignatieff.  He does better on his own and away from the Commons, but he can't seem to manage a complex strategic narrative or debate with people more politically skilled than he.  Campaign leaders debates are very stressful undertakings that require a lot of political skill, and that's not something he's ever demonstrated to me.  Ignatieff will be debating against three leaders who have each participated in three or more debates already.  It's not a TV panel of intellectuals on the BBC.  I expect him to be overconfident, not take advice from his strategists, and be a big arrogant flop.