Gaza Flotilla Stormed by Israel, Part III

117 posts / 0 new
Last post
contrarianna

The Orwellian propaganda spin of the flotilla attack in the media is a microcosm of the spin on the state of Israel's "victimhood" and "self-defense" as it continues its ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

Quote:
[ Edward Peck, a career [US]foreign service officer and former ambassador, was with the Gaza-bound humanitarian flotilla that was raided by Israel on Monday. He was detained by Israel, processed and expelled from the country. Now back in the United States, he spoke with Salon on Thursday.]

What do you think of the American media coverage of this event?

Here's the thing. I just got off a radio interview. One of the things that distresses me is the extent to which Israel has been successful in, for example, getting Americans to ask questions as to why the passengers on that big Turkish ship attacked the Israeli soldiers.

I said, wait a minute, wait a minute, they were defending the ship against people who were attacking it. You've got it backwards. There are civilians, men and woman, on a Turkish-flagged vessel, in international waters. And here comes a group of heavily armed -- forget the paintball story -- heavily armed guys who are going to take over the ship by force and then take it to Israel, where the passengers don't want to go. And so they pick up deck chairs and other things to fight off these heavily armed -- and by the way, masked -- commandos, and somehow they become the attackers. So, that depresses me a little bit....


http://www.salon.com/news/israel_flotilla_attack/index.html?story=/polit...

NDPP

More Glick

Israel's Daunting Task:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=177503

"The ferocity and speed of the current international assault on Israel has left the government in a daze. Statements from our leaders are marked by confusion. This reaction is understandable. Everywhere Israel turns it is met with hostility..."

Polunatic2

Quote:
 the US abandonment of its support for Israel specifically.

Yup. Abandoned. Does that mean Israel will not accept the nearly $3 billion in military aid provided by the US? 

Does one need read any further than this? 

NDPP

Glick is hilarious and JP used to be a Tubby Black paper too..

Gilad Atzmon on Israeli Collective Madness (RT and vid)

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-on-israeli-collective-madne...

"Gilad Atzmon a British writer and musician who was born in Israel and served in the Israeli army, believes that the raid will lead the world to see what Israel is all about...'They are convinced that the more people they kill, the more people will be deterred to jeopardise what they regard as their security.."

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

 

UN orders Israel to lift Gaza blockade

 

 

I wonder why the UN boss thinks Israel will comply this time?

 

 

 

 

 

 

No Yards No Yards's picture

Boom Boom wrote:

 

UN orders Israel to lift Gaza blockade

 

 

I wonder why the UN boss thinks Israel will comply this time?

 

Why because of the great respect they have for "international law" .. you know, the same "international law" they claim as a validation for attacking aid ships in international waters.

 

 

Frustrated Mess Frustrated Mess's picture

NoDifferencePartyPooper wrote:

More Glick

Israel's Daunting Task:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=177503

"The ferocity and speed of the current international assault on Israel has left the government in a daze. Statements from our leaders are marked by confusion. This reaction is understandable. Everywhere Israel turns it is met with hostility..."

There is a wonderfully written article by Ira Chernus on AlterNet that addresses the psychology of Glick. 

Quote:

The other side in the Israeli debate within the government takes a very different approach. Why bother even thinking about the world’s response, they ask. The world hates us anyway. Nothing we do now can make the gentiles hate us more. Since we are surrounded by eternal enemies, let’s forget about world opinion. The only way to insure our survival is to maintain our strength and dominance -- by any means necessary.

 

NDPP

more of the same exploration

Letter from Israel: The Flotilla in the Israeli Press

http://www.countercurrents.org/cohen040610.htm

"How can you turn millions of fairly educated citizens into silent lambs or worse into supporters of their own state's terrorism...?"

contrarianna

Frustrated Mess wrote:

....

There is a wonderfully written article by Ira Chernus on AlterNet that addresses the psychology of Glick. 

Quote:

The other side in the Israeli debate within the government takes a very different approach. Why bother even thinking about the world’s response, they ask. The world hates us anyway. Nothing we do now can make the gentiles hate us more. Since we are surrounded by eternal enemies, let’s forget about world opinion. The only way to insure our survival is to maintain our strength and dominance -- by any means necessary.

To concur with that observation would be to suggest these hawks are really concerned with "survival" rather than the obvious agenda: imperial annexation and expansion. Chernus's description is not born out by any examination of history.

It's true that Israel is largely unconcerned with the opinion the bulk of the world's nations, but that is from a position of power, not fear for survival.
This unconcern for public opinion obviously does not extend to Israel's enabler states, (those nations whose monetary and political support are essential to enable Israel's crimes--eg., the  US, Canada, and much of the West.)  For these states a propaganda tsunami is generated by Israel and its western media supporters which leaves most people, at best, confused, or likely to sympathize with Israel.

For a summary of Israel's very great concern with public opinion in enabler states see Glenn Greenwald:

Quote:
Friday, Jun 4, 2010 08:05 ET
How Israeli propaganda shaped U.S. media coverage of the flotilla attack

It was clear from the moment news of the flotilla attack emerged that Israel was taking extreme steps to suppress all evidence about what happened other than its own official version....

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/04/israel

 

 

Webgear

I found the following information on the BBC website:

 

Legality Of Convoy Raid

 

  • The UN Charter on the Law of the Sea says only if a vessel is suspected to be transporting weapons, or weapons of mass destruction, can it be boarded in international waters. Otherwise the permission of the ship's flag carrying nation must be sought.
  • The charter allows for naval blockades, but the effect of the blockade on civilians must be proportionate to the effect on the military element for the blockade to be legally enforceable.
  • A ship trying to breach a blockade can be boarded and force may be used to stop it as long as it is "necessary and proportionate".

     

    Does anyone know how accurate this information is?

  • Unionist

    Webgear, Israel has far more resources than you do when it comes to justifying their bloodthirsty actions.

    But, if you're intent on figuring it out yourself, why not [url=http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.... the research[/url] and let us know the verdict.

    -=+=-

    Dead Gaza activists shot at close range and riddled with bullets:  autopsy results [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/04/gaza-flotilla-activists-auto....

    Quote:

    Israel was tonight under pressure to allow an independent inquiry into its assault on the Gaza aid flotilla after autopsy results on the bodies of those killed, obtained by the Guardian, revealed they were peppered with 9mm bullets, many fired at close range.

    Nine Turkish men on board the Mavi Marmara were shot a total of 30 times and five were killed by gunshot wounds to the head, according to the vice-chairman of the Turkish council of forensic medicine, which carried out the autopsies for the Turkish ministry of justice today.

    Webgear

     

    Unionist, you are right. I will research the Law of the Sea and start a thread tomorrow with my findings.

    Agent 204 Agent 204's picture

    If Israel comes to genuinely fear for its survival, things could get very bad indeed. For instance, consider this rather disturbing claim. Can't vouch for its accuracy, but it's consistent with some of what Chomsky says in Fatal Triangle:

    Quote:
    Noted Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld stated that Israel could find itself one day forced to exterminate the European continent using all kinds of weapons including its nuclear arsenal if it felt its demise neared, stressing that Israel also considers Europe a hostile target.

    This came in a press interview broadcast by the seventh Hebrew radio and was translated on Wednesday into Arabic by the press information analysis and study center.

    "We have hundreds of nuclear warheads and missiles that can reach different targets in the heart of the European continent, including beyond the borders of Rome, the Italian capital," Creveld said, adding that most of the European capitals would become preferred targets for the Israeli air force.

    The Israeli historian reiterated Israel's ability to destroy the whole world whenever it felt its existence would be doomed to extinction.

    As for the Palestinians, the historian said that Israel at the present time pursues a specific strategy based on mass deportation of the Palestinian people and has intentions to expel all Palestinians without exception, but it is awaiting the right moment to take this step.

    I was pondering a somewhat similar idea today. If it looked like Israel was going to be overrun, I wonder if they'd hit Mecca with a cobalt bomb; this would make the city and surroundings lethally radioactive for decades, effectively turning the Hajj into a suicide mission. But maybe I shouldn't be giving them ideas...

    Slumberjack

    Apparently the conspiracy sites are bursting at the seams.

    Maysie Maysie's picture

    Pages

    Topic locked