Rob Ford: The Mayor We Deserve?

46 posts / 0 new
Last post
shawnsage
Rob Ford: The Mayor We Deserve?

I recently moved into a new apartment.  The harmoniousness of its affordability to niceness ratio and its proximity to work and essential services (i.e. The Beer Store) make it an ideal home for me at this phase in my life.   So all is well with my current living situation, with one nagging exception....

I share a building with Rob Ford’s biggest fan.

Now it’s not just the omnipresence of the ‘Rob Ford For Mayor’ hat and button she always sports and her insistence on slapping ‘Rob Ford For Mayor’ stickers all over the building that are the problem.   They are ugly sights to be sure, but this alone would only constitute a minor irritation.  The problem is the woman is a rather extreme example of an ‘energy vampire.’  You may have never heard the term but it is an intuitive one, so I’m sure you are instantly having unpleasant flashbacks of encounters with one or many of the regrettably numerous people who fit the bill.  If you work in or have worked in retail, you know this type of person very, very well. 

The energy vampire is a person who displays relentless negativity and boorish self-absorption.  What they engage in cannot be accurately described as conversations; but as unsolicited, unilateral verbal onslaughts that leave the recipient nodding in inattention as they focus only on finding a space where they can interject what they hope will be the perfect sentence to politely extricate themselves from the maddening predicament.  Now there are varying degrees of energy vampire but my neighbour, ‘Rob Ford’s Biggest Fan (Forever?  BFF?)’ is one of the most wretchedly high order.

The above touchstones of the energy vampire are all there in her displayed in abundance, but she also ups the ante by throwing in some good old fashioned racism - talking about the ‘black guys smoking drugs’ and the guy in the building who lets a black man housesit ‘because there’s nothing to steal there.’ 

This woman of all encompassing ugliness is the perfect embodiment of the current mood of the Toronto electorate because ugly is the best adjective to describe the mood of a city where, according to the latest poll, most people have decided that Rob Ford is the best man to be its leader.  Now, it is still very early in the election and Ford is in the lead at only about 18% in a statistical tie with George Smitherman with 40% of those polled still undecided, but the fact he is getting this much support casts a pall over the voters of Toronto.  

In place of anything even remotely resembling the vision of a true leader, Ford offers only the penny pinching hands of a Scrooge and ideas as nuanced, and about as intelligent, as a wrecking ball.  His resonance with voters can only be attributed to a cynical loathing of municipal government stemming from petty selfishness and a total ignorance of the real issues facing this city.

It is an ignorance Ford both shares and champions.   Coming from any of the other candidates for mayor (with the exception of Giorgio Mammolitti, a fellow jester of a city councillor who unlike Ford is deservingly low in the polls), Ford’s ideas for fixing the city would be written off as deceitful promises they know they can’t keep.   With Ford, though, after 10 years of consistently displaying herculean feats of stupidity as city councillor, it is totally believable that he is fool enough to think that his logic defying ideas can actually remedy what ails Toronto.

He claims that, as he cuts taxes and user fees, he can at the same time hire more police officers and build more subways by cutting the number of city councillors in half to 22 and by reigning in city spending.  Well, first off, it is plain idiocy to halve the number of people who are democratically elected to represent and respond to the concerns of the citizens of Toronto and replace them with police officers.  The crime rate is down, so why on earth do we need more cops driving around the city looking for something to do?  People are getting harassed by bored police officers plenty enough already, thank you very much.  More to the point, however, Ford thinks this would make our streets safer, but more police on the streets do nothing to reduce crime.  As study upon study shows, the crime rate goes down when there is a reduction in poverty and an increase in social engagement.  Strong governments can accomplish these goals, a larger police force cannot.

What is most remarkable, though, about Ford’s ‘more cops/less councillors’ plan is the sheer ignorance on display from a city councillor of a city council he has been a member of for 10 years.  The Mayor does make the executive decisions and wields influence over every nook and cranny of city council, but he/she still only represents one vote on council for any major policy change, like say...CUTTING CITY COUNCIL IN HALF!  Is he really so ignorant to think these people are going to vote themselves out of a job they have worked their asses off to get and are (in most cases) deeply committed to?  Or, more cynically speaking, are they gonna vote themselves out of a near six figure gig with lots of perks?  Or, does he think that being Mayor comes with a shiny magical rubber stamp where he just has to write down his desires on a piece of paper, stamp it, and then it’s the law.  With Ford, it is conceivable that he could be that stupid.

As for raising funds for new subways that cost $300,000 a kilometre by LOWERING taxes and trimming the supposed fat in city spending, Ford really earns the title of champion of Toronto’s ignorance with this one.   Obviously, it would be naive to think there is no waste in any budget of such a great size.  I run a business that grosses less than the cost of a kilometre of subway and even I find waste inescapable.  Human fallibility being what it is there surely will be waste at City Hall, but to think that there are the multiple billions of dollars necessary for subway expansion to be found by cutting waste in a budget of $9 Billion – a budget that mostly goes to core city services like police, transit and waste management - is an insult to logic.

The sad truth is there is no great mismanagement at Toronto City Hall.  Our city’s financial woes are primarily the result of an imbalance in funding to Canadian cities under an antiquated system rooted in the days when most of the country lived in rural areas.  Those days are long gone, but the Federal and Provincial finance ministries have not properly evolved to address the reality that most Canadians now live in urban areas.  

For every dollar in taxes Torontonians pay to the Federal and Provincial government, the city gets well under 10 cents back to provide essential services to Toronto taxpayers.  And, with the exception of health care, it is the most crucial public services that our municipal government is responsible for funding with only property taxes and modest user fees at its disposal – services such as police, transit, fire services, waste management and road maintenance.   Greatly exacerbating this imbalance, as well, is the downloading of provincial responsibilities of social welfare programs onto the city that began with the Mike Harris government of the 1990’s and mostly continues to this day.  To be blunt, Toronto gets the shaft big time and, if the people of Toronto truly understood this, Rob Ford wouldn’t be first in the polls, but neck and neck with Mammoliti in the single digits.

This is something that Mayor David Miller understood and it is an arena where he has displayed courageous leadership.  He tried to address these inequities with his undeservingly failed bid to have the Federal government transfer one cent of the GST to Toronto.  It was a bold and innovative initiative, but was met with crickets by a Federal government that views our city primarily as a cash cow for the rest of the country.

In this culture of chronic underfunding, Miller nonetheless still managed to win funding from the Provincial government (and, to a lesser extent, the Feds) for the ‘Transit City’ plan, the first meaningful transit expansion in Toronto in decades.  While it does not go nearly far enough to address the transit needs of this every growing city that has neglected those needs for far too long, it was a major victory for Toronto to get this kind of transit expansion in the face of such miserly upper levels of government.

Has Miller been perfect?  Not at all - Mayor of Toronto has to be one of the most thankless jobs imaginable, so even approaching the ballpark of perfection would be an unreasonable expectation.   However, the accomplishments in his two terms as mayor are impressive – Transit City, the ‘New Deal For Cities’ that added modest revenue streams, cleaning up City Hall of the Lastman-era cronyism typified by the MFP computer leasing scandal, increased waste diversion, the Waterfront development, Nuit Blanche, and his always impeccable performance representing Toronto on the international stage. 

Even his alleged great failures resulted in more benefit than detriment to the city.  The St Clair Streetcar Right Of Way did run behind schedule and over-budget, but the positive effect on the St Claire West community and the city at large from this rapid transit initiative will far outweigh the negative.   As for the garbage strike of 2009 that could be called the fatal political blow to Miller’s reign as mayor, a man so often accused of being in the pockets of the unions won for the city what no right-leaning mayor of the past ever did – an eventual elimination of the costly and ridiculous banking of worker’s sick days.

David Miller has been a fine leader of this city, moving us forward under the very trying circumstances of chronic underfunding coupled with the worst global recession since the Depression, and how have we repaid him for his efforts on our behalf?  With a 30% approval rating and the slap in the face of throwing support behind Rob Ford, a man who would love nothing more than to dismantle all that he has accomplished.  

Ford has been a city councillor for 10 years and in that time he has given us a good idea as to what his vision for our city is with his buffoonish words and his shameful record.  Rob Ford’s Toronto is a city where ‘roads are for cars’ and it is cyclists ‘own fault if they get killed...where ‘if you don’t do drugs and you aren’t gay, you won’t get AIDS’... where musing about ‘the orientals taking over’ and calling a colleague ‘gino boy’ is appropriate for a leader of a world class city.  It is a city where we say fuck the poor, they’re all just lazy bastards waiting for a handout...and fuck transit and bike lanes, just keep my property taxes low so I got plenty of gas and insurance money...and fuck building a city that I want to explore and be a participant in because I just want to drive home after work and watch American shows on my big screen TV.

More likely than not, people will come to their senses and he won’t make it anywhere near the office of mayor.  However, if this is really what is resonating right now with the people of Toronto, maybe Rob Ford is the mayor we deserve.  Perhaps Toronto needs to endure 4 years of Mayor Rob Ford to learn the hard way that we already had a perfectly fine Mayor who we chased away for doing exactly what we needed him to do.

Or maybe people are just curious what it would be like to have a mayor that makes Mel Lastman come across as Barack Obama....

Issues Pages: 
My Cat Knows Better My Cat Knows Better's picture

    " The 2008 Annual Report by the Federation of Canadian

Municipalities, written when the Federal government was pull-

ing in nearly $14-billion in budget surpluses, paints a grim pic-

ture of the coming collapse of Canada’s municipal infrastructure.

The report found that Canada has used up 79% of the service life

of its public infrastructure and has set the price of eliminating the

infrastructural deficit at $123-billion."

Just what the City of Toronto is in need of. A tax cutting, service reducing mayor that will ensure that the quality of life will deteriorate further.

Maysie Maysie's picture

Hi shawnsage, welcome to babble.

I've moved this from "introductions" to "central canada".

But, um I have to say, and you should know very few people hate Rob Ford as much as I do, that the unfounded statements and allegations sprinkled throughout the opening post are not cool. Perhaps even libelous. I will get back to you on that.

I've done some heavy editing, including deleting some extremely offensive wording about your neighbour. If you have any questions, please email me at maysie(at)rabble(dot)ca.

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

I'm sure I hate Rob Ford more than you Maysie.   Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!  Money mouth

Bacchus

Im in his ward. He makes us drink the kool aid

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

How's it taste? 

Bacchus

Cherry with bitter almond but afterwards, we love him

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

I love me some cherry.  rob ford's not cool.  Yell

 

peace bacchus.

Cueball Cueball's picture

Indeed, he is merely the foil that will be used to ensure Smitherman's success, and as such will make Smitherman the "least worst option", who in reality is the only one capable of truly making Ford's agenda bear fruit.

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

I have no doubt ford will lose but like you im scared of the options.

Cueball Cueball's picture

My point is that really, if it comes down to it, I prefer the sheep in wolves clothing, Ford, to the wolf in sheeps clothing, Smitherman.

RevolutionPlease RevolutionPlease's picture

Interesting.  I'm hoping for Pantalone,

Cueball Cueball's picture

Ford will divide the council and screw everything up. Smitherman will adroitly manipulate his power position as a former Liberal Cabinet minister and play the funding shell game with the Liberals and do much of what Ford says he will do. He will certainly be very active at trying to privatize the garbage collection, and possibly succeed, where Ford would just succeed at alienating the council and the electorate.

It's good to vote Joe nonetheless, because that will undermine Smitherman not Ford, and increase Ford's chance of success, also, a strong vote for Joe will dampen the sense that either Smitherman or Ford have a strong mandate to turn the city of Toronto into a wasteland feading sanctuary for unaccountable privatizing corporate interests.

Vote Joe!

Cueball Cueball's picture
Cueball Cueball's picture

Here is a good take-down of Smitherman

Another one: Curious about George

shawnsage

Maysie...would it have been 'extremely offensive' if I was talking the same way about a man?  Also, I can't see how it's libelous if I'm not identifying her.  Anyway, probably not worth a big debate on it...thanks for the welcome and moving the article to a more appropriate place.  Being a newbie, I was confused and put it in the wrong place. 

As for being Smitherman the greater evil...interesting theory...it is true that he'd actually be able to get his ideas through city council.  Maybe the 'anybody but Ford' crowd will prove to be the saviour of Furious George's lacluster campaign.  I'm wavering between Pantalone and Thomson, but if it looks like Ford still has a shot in November, I may have to hold my nose and vote for Smitherman.  I think he's too much of a centrist to be too damaging and, the numbers not adding up notwithstanding, his transit plan is impressive.

Stockholm

I agree with Cueball (!) - Ford would actually be preferable to Smitherman. It would be different if we had a parliamentary system at city hall and a Mayor Ford was going to command a party with a majority of seats on council and be able to do whatever he wanted. But the fact is that if he did become mayor there would simply be complete paralysis. The left hates him, the centre hates, the right hates him - he is essentially a party of ONE on council. He would be divisive and never get a single thing passed. It would be bad - but with Furious George you would have a mayor who was a rightwing Liberal hell-bent on mass privatization and probably able to push it all through - PLUS Smitherman would gratuitously try to knee cap anyone with NDP ties at every opportunity and try to create a Toronto Liberal Party.

 

Sineed

Weirdly, I also prefer Ford to Smitherman.  Ford would be ineffective, and things would go along business as usual, while Smitherman is capable of doing serious damage.

Cueball Cueball's picture

Maybe you can hold your nose, but you will still be standing in shit.

There isn't anything impressive about colluding with McGuinty to cut transit services that McGuinty already agreed to pay for through Miller, and putting garbage collection in the hands of unaccountable corporate interests, exploiting desperate people.

Basically subcontracting out transit lines to companies like Viva, just downloads more costs to the private individual, since they only buy the profitable routes, and leave the less used more expensive "public service" routes to the Public Transit System, which have to be subsidized by the public. At the other end, there is no difference in cost per fare over the old Go Transit system running from Finch to Newmarket. Once they are in, its very difficult to get them out, and they can basically charge what they want.

Here it is in a nutshell, the profits that come from the profitable routes that the Smitherman's of the world would sell, are the profits we use to pay for the less profitable routes that ensure comprehensive service for all Torontonians.

More cost. Less service. Nothing impressive about that, at all.

As for garbage, I'd rather have decently paid professionals who have something to lose doing the job of collecting my garbage. Who really wants a bunch of underpaid ne'er do wells shipped in from the unemployment line who can't make ends meet on $10 an hour sifting through your garbage, while they are casing your house for supplementary fringe benefits derived from knowing who is home and who is not?

People are pretty short sighted I know.

Are you reall ready for another round of throwing public money at Smitherman's corporate friends, for absolutely no viable return. At a price tag of a billion they couldn't even make E-health work.

Where is the public accountablitiy there?

Michelle

Exactly!  That's what I've been arguing for months! :)  (Just not here, that's all.)  Glad I'm not the only one!

Markbo

"cutting the number of city councillors in half to 22"... "about Ford’s ‘more cops/less councillors’ plan is the sheer"

Vancouver 2.1million population 10 councillors

Brooklyn 2.5 million population 16 councillors

Queens 2.3 million population 13 councillors

Los Angeles 3.5 million population 15 councillors

 

Are you for real, you think Toronto has the right number of councillors. Its the laughing stock of the world.

What basis do you even have for trying to assert that Toronto city council doesn't desperately need downsizing?

You don't want to spend the money on police, fine, its a lot of money that could be spent on a lot of better items

Any councillor who votes against this doesn't deserve to be a councillor as they obviously don't care about Toronto

ignorance "

 

Michelle

Wow, Markbo...it's been a long time!

Looks like you need to get a hang of the new formatting.  Very different now. :)

edmundoconnor

@Markbo: How do we know that the councillors in those cities/boroughs do a better job at representing their constituents? Citing bald numbers doesn't prove anything.

Cutting the number of councillors (and their staff and expense accounts) saves only a few million, at the very most, at the cost of increasing the democratic deficit.

I'm quite frankly amazed that Ford is willing to give McGuinty a free pass on funding transit (to cite one area) by not even mentioning the province in regard to that area. Ford soft on Liberals? If that charge could stick, that would be very damaging.

Lord Palmerston

[url=http://blog.jameslaxer.com/2010/03/george-smitherman-privatizer-no-thank... Laxer on Smitherman[/url]:

Quote:
You learn a lot about a candidate for public office when he or she first stakes out a position on a key issue.

In this case, the candidate is George Smitherman, who recently left the Ontario Liberal cabinet, to run for mayor of Toronto. In an in-depth interview with the Toronto Star, Smitherman mused that he would consider privatizing garbage pick-up in Toronto and the privatization of some of the city’s public transit lines.

Anyone who has studied privatization of garbage collection and pubic transit knows that this comes down to two things: saving money by slashing workers’ salaries and making it easier to lay them off; and creating a cash cow for businesses all too happy to make profits at the expense of workers and taxpayers.

Experiments with privatization of transit have been undertaken in many countries, a notable case being the United Kingdom. The UK experience with privatized train and bus service teaches anyone who cares to look that the private sector is not more efficient than the pubic sector. Over time, capital investments fall in the renewal and upgrading of the services. Wages decline and there’s plenty of money to be made by businesses who step in---often with close ties to privatizing governments.

If you want to experience expensive and lousy train and bus service, try Britain. Compared to the systems on the other side of the Channel, all that’s to be said for Britain is that it’s quaint. And it’s somewhat romantic kissing your significant other goodbye in the mornings wondering if you’ll ever see them again.

No George. If your first thought about being mayor is to back a scheme that will reduce public services over the long-term and widen the income gap in Toronto---clearly the city’s greatest problem---you’re not for us. And please don’t try to fob us off with the line that you are for “Privatization if necessary, but not necessarily privatization.”

oldgoat

Hi Markbo, great to see you again!

 

I was thinking the other day of the great Markbo/Dr. Conway wars of years gone by.  Now I'm one of the people who'll get to hand out the suspensions.

 

You still Windsor's most distinguished bar owner?

Stockholm

Speaking of city council sizes - Montreal has a much smaller population than Toronto and has 65 city councillors. PEI only has 140,000 residents yet has a legislature with 32 members!

Sure, it costs something to have more councillors - but it also means more representation. You could cut the number of councillors in half - but in the end you'd save almost nothing because you would have double the office budget and staff budget for each councillor to make up for the fact that they would suddenly be servicing double the number of constituents.

If we want to start applying dollars and cents to politics - why not go for the cheapest option of all - have no city councillors at all and just election a one time mayor for life who then gets to appoint whoever he or she wants! If all that matters is doing whatever is cheapest - then to hell with democratic elections altogether and let's just have divine right of kings!

Maysie Maysie's picture

Hee hee Stockholm, that was funny. Scary, but funny.

clandestiny

Do any of you persons listen to talk radio?

The gist of the reactionary rightwing viewpoint is that 'rob ford' (it was a Robert Ford, btw, a notorious coward, who shot Jesse James in the back!...i betcha/is it possible? that Rob's parents named him with the coward in mind(?)) should be mayor, and if he becomes mayor DESPITE the lefty media/political culture, then he will make everything right, get ridda the homeless, and punish wrongdoers, and terrorise the liberal media etc. He will build statues to mike harris and george 'the youngster' bush, and will balance the budget while putting policemen at every building site in GTA! How will he do all this? BY SAYING IT, loud and relentlessly again, in/on every media outlet. MIND OVER MATTER!

Paul Gross

 

Markbo wrote:

"cutting the number of city councillors in half to 22"... "about Ford’s ‘more cops/less councillors’ plan is the sheer"

Vancouver 2.1million population 10 councillors

Vancouver has 578,000 residents. The 2.1 million is the vancouver metro area which is composed of a bunch of cities. http://vancouver.ca/aboutvan.htm

Uncle John

I invented the term Energy Vampire during the election of 2006. It has since spread like wildfire

 

Stockholm

The nice thing about Rob Ford becoming mayor is that he would fail 100% at accomplishing ANY of the things listed below. He won't get anything through council and will just be a loud mouthed buffoon who wiull break every single promise he makes. It would be almst worth it to see all those rightwing cranks who call talk radio finally get one of their own elected mayor and then see thei reacytion when he fails spectacularly at everything he touches.

clandestiny wrote:

Do any of you persons listen to talk radio?

The gist of the reactionary rightwing viewpoint is that 'rob ford' (it was a Robert Ford, btw, a notorious coward, who shot Jesse James in the back!...i betcha/is it possible? that Rob's parents named him with the coward in mind(?)) should be mayor, and if he becomes mayor DESPITE the lefty media/political culture, then he will make everything right, get ridda the homeless, and punish wrongdoers, and terrorise the liberal media etc. He will build statues to mike harris and george 'the youngster' bush, and will balance the budget while putting policemen at every building site in GTA! How will he do all this? BY SAYING IT, loud and relentlessly again, in/on every media outlet. MIND OVER MATTER!

Cueball Cueball's picture

Stockholm wrote:

The nice thing about Rob Ford becoming mayor is that he would fail 100% at accomplishing ANY of the things listed below. He won't get anything through council and will just be a loud mouthed buffoon who wiull break every single promise he makes. It would be almst worth it to see all those rightwing cranks who call talk radio finally get one of their own elected mayor and then see thei reacytion when he fails spectacularly at everything he touches.

Plus it would be wildly entertaining to watch.

Lord Palmerston

One could argue that Rocco Rossi is the most rightwing candidate in the race, as Rossi is the only who supports privatizing Toronto Hydro.

adma

Well, he's definitely the most "upper class elite" candidate, i.e. the one who, on paper at least, would paradoxically play better with the "Harper Richview" crowd.  Whereas Ford's more of a "little guy" Reagan Democrat populist--a lot of his voters are the kind who might have gone for Ed Philip a generation ago...

Lord Palmerston

Rossi is also the candiate least likely to do best in his "home" riding (which is St. Paul's).

Doug

Markbo wrote:

Are you for real, you think Toronto has the right number of councillors. Its the laughing stock of the world.

What basis do you even have for trying to assert that Toronto city council doesn't desperately need downsizing?

 

In the case of Vancouver the relevant entity to look to would be the Metro Vancouver board, and that has 37 members.

I'm not sure on what basis it needs downsizing. Yes, it's expensive but even making it disappear completely doesn't make a whole lot of difference to the city budget. Council could stand to be faster and more functional but I think the reasons for that have more to do with disagreements as to how the city should be run and what's important that aren't just going ot go away as a result of there being fewer councillors to express them.

It's a pretty academic discussion anyway because it's not going to happen. There's no way half of council is going to vote to eliminate itself. There's not much in it for the provincial government to impose that change.

edmundoconnor

Ford's brain trust speaks (referenced here). Hmm, who do I trust more on transit: this guy, or Steve Munro?

clandestiny

Lord Palmerston wrote:

One could argue that Rocco Rossi is the most rightwing candidate in the race, as Rossi is the only who supports privatizing Toronto Hydro.

Rossi has an ad on www.democraticunderground.com which says he's not 'rightwing' in the way rob ford,  and ford promoters adler/stafford/oakley (hate radio) etc, are.

Rightwing isn't bad, in itself. The problem with the typical, harper style rightwinger is the endless variations on truth they use up to try to defraud their supporters, and we too, needless to say.

Farmpunk

"PLUS Smitherman would gratuitously try to knee cap anyone with NDP ties at every opportunity and try to create a Toronto Liberal Party."

Funny, Stockholm, I thought the current Ont Libs were a Toronto party....

Stockholm

They are - but do you really want to sign a formal Liberal Party of Toronto running candidates under the Liberal party banner in all 44 wards - all sworn to vote for 100% of what Smitherman wants?

twashing

I wouldn't simply dismiss Rob Ford and say that he will fail on all his agendas because he's unintelligent. That's a bad strategic play. Instead, we should all be engaging to create an alternative we want to see. Grooming real alternatives involves seriously looking at what current candidates are offering.

ROB FORD

A) Promise: Cut taxes and Government spending.
Problems:
    - Fiscal austerity doesn't grow a city. The real question we need to answer is what investments do we need to make now, to get the city we want to see in 5 to 10 years. I think "investments" in transit, social/city services, arts, et al will give more than their returns for the life of the investment. Imagine not having the Yonge University subway lines. What if they didn't make that investment back in the 50s.
    - Everyone makes promises, especially to cut taxes (land transfer tax is the only one that should definitely go) and gov't spending. George Bush famously promised to cut taxes, spending, but expanded both by more than 50% in his term. And Barack Obama who famously rose to power on "hope" and "promise", has also broken most of his promises.
    - He doesn't have a structured analysis of where to allocate funds for which programmes , for a given tax revenue stream.
    - The spending analysis he has on his site is what councillors spend of their alloted amount (a blame game). We can reduce councillor's spending budgets if it bothers people. But I want to see the overall city spending, lending etc. I'm sure councillor budgets will be miniscule in that pie

B) Promise: Introduce a Customer Service focus to City Hall
Problem:
    - All the candidates, including George Smithermann, Sarah Thompson and Rocco Rossi have advocated a more customer focused approached to City Hall. Rocco Rossi was the first that I remember, followed by Sarah Thompson
    - Being close to the "User Experince" (part of Customer Service) industry, I know there are a lot of structural / admin tasks that have to be tackled in order to get Customer Service right. Things like License registration (for Businesses, etc), Zoning (which is currently being reformed) have to be tackled and are tricky to get right. Rob Ford has not discussed any of these or any other things that actually have to do with Customer Service.

C) Promise: Downsize Council from 44 to 22 Councillors
Problem:
    - Removing half of Council doesn't guarantee that only the bad councillors go. Statistically, there would then only be 11 bad councillors if there were 22 prevously (If the downsizing is done on a district basis (2 neighbouring districts are represented by 1 councillor)).
    - Ford doesn't address the issue of representation. Will 2 wards be represented by 1 councillor?
    - Reducing salaries doesn't guarantee that City Hall will work any better. Any organisation's effectiveness depends on it's structure, not the number of members in it's organisational unit.

General Problems

** makes too many mistakes of low complexity ( a reasonably intelligent person wouldn't make these mistakes ):
1. Ford stated he was a people person, answering thousands of constituents calls over the past few years. When Rossi pointed out that that meant 100s of calls a day, every day for that period, he didn't apologise for making an untrue statement, just continued on.
2. In this video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8EpSdyB0zY ), Ford fights with a journalist. That was due to the fact that Ford was caught making an untrue statement about a city councillor. Instead of addressing the discrepancy, he picked a fight about his weight.
3. Promised to help obtain illegal substances for an AIDS sufferer. I don't know if he was speaking out of compassion or what, but you have to know how an illegal drugs claim will look on anybody especially while running for mayor. Whether or not you agree with current drug laws, I think this speaks to Ford's judgement.

** Rob Ford's lead policy analyst advocated selling off the TTC to the private sector. Didn't care that people would lose out on service. Ford's campaign has distanced itself from said comments. But you have to be worried that the campaign would have to distance itself from positions of it's top policy analyst.

** Planning and Transit. I haven't heard Ford say anything intelligible about Urban Planning ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_planning ), the profession and mechanics of how a city integrates land use, transportation, etc to improve the built, social and economic environment. When asked about this, he mostly talks about successfully running his own business - again avoiding the question on an important issue. 

Summary

** I DO agree with Ford that there should be fiscal responsibility. Specifically, I agree that the increase in land transfer tax should go,  and that  subways are the way to go (for major lines) as opposed to light rail.
** I also agree that City Council should be making efficiencies in Customer Service. But this takes more than just inspirational phrases - "leadership and accountability" ( "hope" and "change" anyone? ). This involves understanding and tackling real issues like land use and zoning laws, document management & transparency (ex: getting web access to court decisions, zoning history, etc), etc ). 

But Rob Ford fails in my mind on my first and biggest golden rule for leaders. If I don't hear a structural analysis (taxes, gov't spending, whatever), that's my first and biggest politician red flag Also, a bombastic politician talking to an angry public is one of the most dangerous things in politics. I think Rob Ford is well intentioned (in his own mind), but would make an atrocious Mayor. A Harold Ballard for the City of Toronto.

 

Now, what alternatives can we create?

adma

twashing wrote:
A Harold Ballard for the City of Toronto.

Quote of the year.

NDPP

Rob Ford 911 Calls Raise Questions

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1108648--911-calls-to-ford-s-home-a-...

"Early Christmas morning, police were called to the home of Mayor Rob Ford about a reported domestic dispute. It was the second such call in as many months.."

Maysie Maysie's picture

But wait, there's more.

From the Ford-friendly Toronto Sun:

Quote:

Information from the 911 call leaked to a newspaper indicated a domestic dispute was taking place and that Ford's mother-in-law called police to report the mayor had been drinking and was taking his children to Florida contrary to what wife Renata wanted.

...

Turns out Ford had not heard of the media report but said everything was now fine.

....

His brother Doug, who was with the mayor in Florida and like him, returned home Friday, said "Rob was not drinking as reported. It's just inaccurate."

In fact, a source close to the investigation told me that while alcohol was an issue none was consumed by the mayor.

...

There have been other well publicized 911 calls to the Ford's Etobicoke home - including 2008 assault charges against then-councillor Rob Ford which were later dropped. At the time authorities felt it best the children remain the custody of the father as well.

Clearly embarrassed Mayor Ford told me: "Look, I think you know a lot of people who have problems behind closed doors."

Doug said his brother loves his wife and as a family they are trying their best to work through personal issues.

Wow, spot the code words.

Update from the Toronto Star, basically the same story without the ass kissing.

Fucking hell fuck.

 

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Just got this from a friend: City Council Reverses Many Key Ford Cuts

excerpt:

In a stunning loss for Mayor Rob Ford and his allies, in one of debate councillors have reversed a significant raft of cuts he was pushing to include in the 2012 budget. Among them: closures of shelters, daycare spaces, and pools, cuts to community grants (to fund things like HIV-prevention services), a major cut to the library system, and a major cut to the TTC. Not all of those cuts were fought back: the library budget is still scaling back on staff and collections, and perhaps most prominently the TTC will still need to reduce service on three dozen bus routes, but the full force of the original draft budget has been substantially blunted.

Bacchus

You mean almost none of the cuts were scaled back, just a mere 15mil